Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities

Penile prosthesis infection is the most significant complication following prosthesis implant surgery leading to postoperative morbidity, increased health care costs, and psychological stress for the patient. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with increased postoperative penile prosthesis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin J. Hebert, Tobias S. Kohler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology 2019-09-01
Series:The World Journal of Men's Health
Subjects:
id doaj-3da902f80b21453ebadd480645e2475a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3da902f80b21453ebadd480645e2475a2020-11-24T21:34:30ZengKorean Society for Sexual Medicine and AndrologyThe World Journal of Men's Health2287-42082287-46902019-09-0137327628710.5534/wjmh.180123Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and RealitiesKevin J. Hebert0Tobias S. Kohler1Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAPenile prosthesis infection is the most significant complication following prosthesis implant surgery leading to postoperative morbidity, increased health care costs, and psychological stress for the patient. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with increased postoperative penile prosthesis infection. A review of the literature was performed via PubMed using search terms including inflatable penile prosthesis, penile implant, and infection. Articles were given a level of evidence score using the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. Multiple factors were associated with increased risk of post-prosthesis placement infection (Level of Evidence Rating) including smoking tobacco (Level 1), CD4 T-cell count <300 (Level 4), Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage (Level 2), revision surgery (Level 2), prior spinal cord injury (Level 3), and hemoglobin A1c level >8.5 (Level 2). Factors with no effect on infection rate include: preoperative cleansing with antiseptic (Level 4), history of prior radiation (Level 3), history of urinary diversion (Level 4), obesity (Level 3), concomitant circumcision (Level 3), immunosuppression (Level 4), age >75 (Level 4), type of hand cleansing (Level 1), post-surgical drain placement (Level 3), and surgical approach (Level 4). Factors associated with decreased rates of infection included: surgeon experience (Level 2), “No Touch” technique (Level 3), preoperative parenteral antibiotics (Level 2), antibiotic coated devices (Level 2), and operative field hair removal with clippers (Level 1). Optimization of pre-surgical and intraoperative risk factors is imperative to reduce the rate of postoperative penile prosthesis infection. Additional research is needed to elucidate risk factors and maximize benefit.Erectile dysfunctionInfectionPenile implantPenile prosthesisSexual dysfunctionphysiological
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin J. Hebert
Tobias S. Kohler
spellingShingle Kevin J. Hebert
Tobias S. Kohler
Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
The World Journal of Men's Health
Erectile dysfunction
Infection
Penile implant
Penile prosthesis
Sexual dysfunction
physiological
author_facet Kevin J. Hebert
Tobias S. Kohler
author_sort Kevin J. Hebert
title Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
title_short Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
title_full Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
title_fullStr Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
title_full_unstemmed Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
title_sort penile prosthesis infection: myths and realities
publisher Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology
series The World Journal of Men's Health
issn 2287-4208
2287-4690
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Penile prosthesis infection is the most significant complication following prosthesis implant surgery leading to postoperative morbidity, increased health care costs, and psychological stress for the patient. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with increased postoperative penile prosthesis infection. A review of the literature was performed via PubMed using search terms including inflatable penile prosthesis, penile implant, and infection. Articles were given a level of evidence score using the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. Multiple factors were associated with increased risk of post-prosthesis placement infection (Level of Evidence Rating) including smoking tobacco (Level 1), CD4 T-cell count <300 (Level 4), Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage (Level 2), revision surgery (Level 2), prior spinal cord injury (Level 3), and hemoglobin A1c level >8.5 (Level 2). Factors with no effect on infection rate include: preoperative cleansing with antiseptic (Level 4), history of prior radiation (Level 3), history of urinary diversion (Level 4), obesity (Level 3), concomitant circumcision (Level 3), immunosuppression (Level 4), age >75 (Level 4), type of hand cleansing (Level 1), post-surgical drain placement (Level 3), and surgical approach (Level 4). Factors associated with decreased rates of infection included: surgeon experience (Level 2), “No Touch” technique (Level 3), preoperative parenteral antibiotics (Level 2), antibiotic coated devices (Level 2), and operative field hair removal with clippers (Level 1). Optimization of pre-surgical and intraoperative risk factors is imperative to reduce the rate of postoperative penile prosthesis infection. Additional research is needed to elucidate risk factors and maximize benefit.
topic Erectile dysfunction
Infection
Penile implant
Penile prosthesis
Sexual dysfunction
physiological
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinjhebert penileprosthesisinfectionmythsandrealities
AT tobiasskohler penileprosthesisinfectionmythsandrealities
_version_ 1725949100157829120