Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants

AIM: To retrospectively compare postoperative outcomes after primary enucleation and placement of a hydroxyapatite (HA) implant without wrapping, wrapped with auricular cartilage or donor sclera. METHODS: Medical records of patients presented as intraocular tumor or severe ocular injury were identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying-Jie Ma, Xiu-Ying Zhu, Ben Chen, Yan-Yan Lin, Jia Liu, Xi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/en_publish/2021/3/20210317.pdf
id doaj-3da15f7956694e658e745559a2e1f664
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3da15f7956694e658e745559a2e1f6642021-02-27T04:22:39ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982021-03-0114343644110.18240/ijo.2021.03.1720210317Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implantsYing-Jie Ma0Xiu-Ying Zhu1Ben Chen2Yan-Yan Lin3Jia Liu4Xi Chen5Xi Chen. Department of Orbit & Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China. ysgchenxi@163.comDepartment of Orbit & Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, ChinaDepartment of Orbit & Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, ChinaDepartment of Orbit & Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, ChinaDepartment of Orbit & Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, ChinaDepartment of Orbit & Oculoplastic Surgery, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, ChinaAIM: To retrospectively compare postoperative outcomes after primary enucleation and placement of a hydroxyapatite (HA) implant without wrapping, wrapped with auricular cartilage or donor sclera. METHODS: Medical records of patients presented as intraocular tumor or severe ocular injury were identified from the electronic medical record system. Cases underwent enucleation and HA orbital implantation were enrolled in this study and were divided into 3 groups according to the wrapping material of HA implant. Cases with autogenous cartilage caps were enrolled in group A (n=11), with donor sclera caps in group B (n=12), and without any wrapping material in group C (n=9). Follow-ups were set at 1, 2wk, 1, 3, 6, and 12mo after surgery. RESULTS: Altogether 32 cases finished the follow-up and were enrolled in this study. Three cases (27.27%) in group A, 4 cases (33.33%) in group B, and 4 cases (44.44%) in group C developed one complication each after surgery. In group A, no HA exposure occurred, but conjunctival inclusion cyst occurred in one and severe conjunctive chemosis in two cases. In group B, one HA exposure occurred, conjunctive inclusion cysts occurred in one, severe conjunctive chemosis occurred in one, and conjunctival granuloma occurred in one case. In group C, one HA exposure occurred, severe conjunctive chemosis occurred in two cases, and conjunctival granuloma occurred in one case. The case of exposure of none-wrapped implant was noted in the first 6mo after placement of the orbital implant. The case of exposure of donor sclera-wrapped implant was noted at the 12mo after placement of the orbital implant. Both exposure cases were treated successfully with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: With low incidence of implant exposure and mild complications, auricular cartilage can be a good choice of alternative wrapping material of orbit implant with satisfied outcome.http://ies.ijo.cn/en_publish/2021/3/20210317.pdfhydroxyapatite orbital implantswrappingauricular cartilagedonor scleracomplication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ying-Jie Ma
Xiu-Ying Zhu
Ben Chen
Yan-Yan Lin
Jia Liu
Xi Chen
spellingShingle Ying-Jie Ma
Xiu-Ying Zhu
Ben Chen
Yan-Yan Lin
Jia Liu
Xi Chen
Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
International Journal of Ophthalmology
hydroxyapatite orbital implants
wrapping
auricular cartilage
donor sclera
complication
author_facet Ying-Jie Ma
Xiu-Ying Zhu
Ben Chen
Yan-Yan Lin
Jia Liu
Xi Chen
author_sort Ying-Jie Ma
title Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
title_short Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
title_full Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
title_fullStr Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
title_full_unstemmed Auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
title_sort auricular cartilage versus donor sclera as a wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
publishDate 2021-03-01
description AIM: To retrospectively compare postoperative outcomes after primary enucleation and placement of a hydroxyapatite (HA) implant without wrapping, wrapped with auricular cartilage or donor sclera. METHODS: Medical records of patients presented as intraocular tumor or severe ocular injury were identified from the electronic medical record system. Cases underwent enucleation and HA orbital implantation were enrolled in this study and were divided into 3 groups according to the wrapping material of HA implant. Cases with autogenous cartilage caps were enrolled in group A (n=11), with donor sclera caps in group B (n=12), and without any wrapping material in group C (n=9). Follow-ups were set at 1, 2wk, 1, 3, 6, and 12mo after surgery. RESULTS: Altogether 32 cases finished the follow-up and were enrolled in this study. Three cases (27.27%) in group A, 4 cases (33.33%) in group B, and 4 cases (44.44%) in group C developed one complication each after surgery. In group A, no HA exposure occurred, but conjunctival inclusion cyst occurred in one and severe conjunctive chemosis in two cases. In group B, one HA exposure occurred, conjunctive inclusion cysts occurred in one, severe conjunctive chemosis occurred in one, and conjunctival granuloma occurred in one case. In group C, one HA exposure occurred, severe conjunctive chemosis occurred in two cases, and conjunctival granuloma occurred in one case. The case of exposure of none-wrapped implant was noted in the first 6mo after placement of the orbital implant. The case of exposure of donor sclera-wrapped implant was noted at the 12mo after placement of the orbital implant. Both exposure cases were treated successfully with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: With low incidence of implant exposure and mild complications, auricular cartilage can be a good choice of alternative wrapping material of orbit implant with satisfied outcome.
topic hydroxyapatite orbital implants
wrapping
auricular cartilage
donor sclera
complication
url http://ies.ijo.cn/en_publish/2021/3/20210317.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yingjiema auricularcartilageversusdonorscleraasawrappingofhydroxyapatiteorbitalimplants
AT xiuyingzhu auricularcartilageversusdonorscleraasawrappingofhydroxyapatiteorbitalimplants
AT benchen auricularcartilageversusdonorscleraasawrappingofhydroxyapatiteorbitalimplants
AT yanyanlin auricularcartilageversusdonorscleraasawrappingofhydroxyapatiteorbitalimplants
AT jialiu auricularcartilageversusdonorscleraasawrappingofhydroxyapatiteorbitalimplants
AT xichen auricularcartilageversusdonorscleraasawrappingofhydroxyapatiteorbitalimplants
_version_ 1724248581242617856