River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis

In the last two decades, researchers have been more interested in river flow forecasting by means of nonlinear models, Genetic Programming, Time-Series, Wavelet Analysis, etc.included. Wavelet transform by decomposition of signals into time and frequency, same as Fourier analysis has presented a new...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Rostami, A. Fakheri-Fard, M. A. Ghorbani, S. Darbandi, Y. Dinpajoh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz 2012-08-01
Series:علوم و مهندسی آبیاری
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jise.scu.ac.ir/article_10512_c8bfead2444f9969228b06531447083e.pdf
id doaj-3d9ca03714884469b76e0c028df71a30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d9ca03714884469b76e0c028df71a302020-11-25T03:04:30ZfasShahid Chamran University of Ahvazعلوم و مهندسی آبیاری2588-59522588-59602012-08-01352738110512River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet AnalysisM. Rostami0A. Fakheri-Fard1M. A. Ghorbani2S. Darbandi3Y. Dinpajoh4Ms in Water Resources Engineering Tabriz UniversityProfessor of Water Engineering Department Tabriz UniversityAssociate Professors of Tabriz UniversityAssociate Professors of Tabriz UniversityAssociate Professors of Tabriz UniversityIn the last two decades, researchers have been more interested in river flow forecasting by means of nonlinear models, Genetic Programming, Time-Series, Wavelet Analysis, etc.included. Wavelet transform by decomposition of signals into time and frequency, same as Fourier analysis has presented a new method for signal processing. Meyer discrete wavelet was used for prediction of average monthly Lighvan-Chai river flow, using 90% of data for testing. The results revealed that 10 levels was the most appropriate number of levels, the best monthly forecasting horizon was 12 months and the correlation coefficient between observed and anticipated ones was 0.92 at Lighvan station and 0.91 at Hervi station. Moreover, in time series, ARIMA ((1,0,1),(1,1,1))<sub>12</sub> had the best results with correlation coefficient 0.87 at Lighvan station and 0.93 at Hervi station. According to data, time series has analyzed peak points better than the other one. Overall, with attention to correlation coefficients and  attention to that complex series change into simple series with wavelet transform that series had analyzed easier, so wavelet transform is more proper than time series.http://jise.scu.ac.ir/article_10512_c8bfead2444f9969228b06531447083e.pdfforecastingwavelet analysisriver flowtime serieslighvan chai
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Rostami
A. Fakheri-Fard
M. A. Ghorbani
S. Darbandi
Y. Dinpajoh
spellingShingle M. Rostami
A. Fakheri-Fard
M. A. Ghorbani
S. Darbandi
Y. Dinpajoh
River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis
علوم و مهندسی آبیاری
forecasting
wavelet analysis
river flow
time series
lighvan chai
author_facet M. Rostami
A. Fakheri-Fard
M. A. Ghorbani
S. Darbandi
Y. Dinpajoh
author_sort M. Rostami
title River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis
title_short River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis
title_full River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis
title_fullStr River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis
title_full_unstemmed River Flow Forecasting using Wavelet Analysis
title_sort river flow forecasting using wavelet analysis
publisher Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
series علوم و مهندسی آبیاری
issn 2588-5952
2588-5960
publishDate 2012-08-01
description In the last two decades, researchers have been more interested in river flow forecasting by means of nonlinear models, Genetic Programming, Time-Series, Wavelet Analysis, etc.included. Wavelet transform by decomposition of signals into time and frequency, same as Fourier analysis has presented a new method for signal processing. Meyer discrete wavelet was used for prediction of average monthly Lighvan-Chai river flow, using 90% of data for testing. The results revealed that 10 levels was the most appropriate number of levels, the best monthly forecasting horizon was 12 months and the correlation coefficient between observed and anticipated ones was 0.92 at Lighvan station and 0.91 at Hervi station. Moreover, in time series, ARIMA ((1,0,1),(1,1,1))<sub>12</sub> had the best results with correlation coefficient 0.87 at Lighvan station and 0.93 at Hervi station. According to data, time series has analyzed peak points better than the other one. Overall, with attention to correlation coefficients and  attention to that complex series change into simple series with wavelet transform that series had analyzed easier, so wavelet transform is more proper than time series.
topic forecasting
wavelet analysis
river flow
time series
lighvan chai
url http://jise.scu.ac.ir/article_10512_c8bfead2444f9969228b06531447083e.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mrostami riverflowforecastingusingwaveletanalysis
AT afakherifard riverflowforecastingusingwaveletanalysis
AT maghorbani riverflowforecastingusingwaveletanalysis
AT sdarbandi riverflowforecastingusingwaveletanalysis
AT ydinpajoh riverflowforecastingusingwaveletanalysis
_version_ 1724681427195265024