Object-Oriented Baudrillard? Withdrawal and Symbolic Exchange

By comparing Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) and Baudrillard through the lens of a study of the notion of withdrawal in Heidegger’s tool analysis and “The Question Concerning Technology”, this article explores the extent to which an Object-Oriented Baudrillard is possible, or even necessary. Consider...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: King Matthew James
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-05-01
Series:Open Philosophy
Subjects:
art
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opphil.2019.2.issue-1/opphil-2019-0008/opphil-2019-0008.xml?format=INT
Description
Summary:By comparing Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) and Baudrillard through the lens of a study of the notion of withdrawal in Heidegger’s tool analysis and “The Question Concerning Technology”, this article explores the extent to which an Object-Oriented Baudrillard is possible, or even necessary. Considering an OOO understanding of Mauss’s gift-exchange, a possible critique of duomining in Baudrillard and a revision of Baudrillard’s understanding of art, the prospects of a new reading of Baudrillard and interpretation of OOO’s genealogy are established. These lines of comparison qualify the role of withdrawal in Baudrillard and symbolic exchange for OOO, and lead towards the conclusion that an Object-Oriented Baudrillard is possible, but may not, conversely, be considered necessary.
ISSN:2543-8875