Extending the hierarchical decision matrix to incorporate a dominance ranking score for economic systematic reviews
As the base of clinical evidence grows, it is increasingly common to conduct economic evaluations in addition to clinical evaluations of effectiveness in order to inform health policies. For economic systematic reviews there is currently no agreed-upon quantitative method to obtain a pooled economic...
Main Authors: | Kenneth Lo, Matthew Stephenson, Craig Lockwood |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-01-01
|
Series: | MethodsX |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016120302673 |
Similar Items
-
An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations
by: Hugo C. Turner, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Incremental expenditure for hospital care associated infections
by: K.S. Sarala, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Economic Analysis of Measures for GHG Emission Reduction
by: Jasmina Ćetković, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Economic evaluation of border closure for a generic severe pandemic threat using New Zealand Treasury methods
by: Matt Boyd, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Cost-benefit analysis of pharmaceutical treatments of infertility using willingness to pay approach
by: Ali Darvishi, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)