A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
Abstract Background In a star-shaped network, pairwise comparisons link treatments with a reference treatment (often placebo or standard care), but not with each other. Thus, comparisons between non-reference treatments rely on indirect evidence, and are based on the unidentifiable consistency assum...
Main Authors: | Jeong-Hwa Yoon, Sofia Dias, Seokyung Hahn |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01290-1 |
Similar Items
-
A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption
by: Corinna Kiefer, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
by: Song Fujian, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01) -
Multiple treatment and indirect treatment comparisons: An overview of network meta-analysis
by: Nidhi Bhatnagar, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Human (In)Consistencies in Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam
by: Anghel Florentina
Published: (2016-12-01) -
The Star-Shape Element in Islamic Art
by: Abdul Fattah Ahmed Abdul Lattef‘
Published: (1991-01-01)