The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market

In this study, we try to answer several empirical questions related to testing of asset pricing models in Pakistan. First, we test the assumptions of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using cross-sectional regression methodology of Fama and MacBeth (FMB) (1973). Second, we test the conditional rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Syed Hamid Ali Shah, Attaullah Shah, Hamid Ullah, Muhammad Kamran Khan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CSRC Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/1592
id doaj-3d6775c6352b448096454128e07d4d2d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d6775c6352b448096454128e07d4d2d2021-03-18T20:24:39ZengCSRC PublishingJournal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies2519-03182518-84882021-01-0171The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock MarketSyed Hamid Ali Shah0Attaullah Shah1Hamid Ullah2Muhammad Kamran Khan3Quaid-e-Azam College of Commerce, University of Peshawar, PakistanInstitute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, PakistanIslamia College University, Peshawar, PakistanBacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan In this study, we try to answer several empirical questions related to testing of asset pricing models in Pakistan. First, we test the assumptions of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using cross-sectional regression methodology of Fama and MacBeth (FMB) (1973). Second, we test the conditional relationship between beta and expected returns using FMB cross-sectional regressions. Third, we test and compare the explanatory power of CAPM and Fama and French (1993) three factor models using time-series regressions. For all of the above empirical tests, we use sufficiently large data set of weekly data from January 2006 to December 2018 of non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Results of the cross-sectional regressions suggest that beta cannot explain expected returns. However, there is weak evidence that a conditional relation exits between beta and expected returns. Results of the time-series regression suggest that both CAPM and three factor model do well in explaining expected returns. However, GRS-based test of regression intercepts and regressions R2 indicate that Fama and French model better captures variations in observed stock returns than the CAPM. https://www.publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/1592CAPM, Risk and returns, Time series regression, Fama and French (1993) three factor model, Pakistan Stock Exchange
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Syed Hamid Ali Shah
Attaullah Shah
Hamid Ullah
Muhammad Kamran Khan
spellingShingle Syed Hamid Ali Shah
Attaullah Shah
Hamid Ullah
Muhammad Kamran Khan
The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies
CAPM, Risk and returns, Time series regression, Fama and French (1993) three factor model, Pakistan Stock Exchange
author_facet Syed Hamid Ali Shah
Attaullah Shah
Hamid Ullah
Muhammad Kamran Khan
author_sort Syed Hamid Ali Shah
title The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
title_short The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
title_full The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
title_fullStr The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
title_full_unstemmed The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
title_sort risk and return relations: new evidence from pakistani stock market
publisher CSRC Publishing
series Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies
issn 2519-0318
2518-8488
publishDate 2021-01-01
description In this study, we try to answer several empirical questions related to testing of asset pricing models in Pakistan. First, we test the assumptions of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using cross-sectional regression methodology of Fama and MacBeth (FMB) (1973). Second, we test the conditional relationship between beta and expected returns using FMB cross-sectional regressions. Third, we test and compare the explanatory power of CAPM and Fama and French (1993) three factor models using time-series regressions. For all of the above empirical tests, we use sufficiently large data set of weekly data from January 2006 to December 2018 of non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Results of the cross-sectional regressions suggest that beta cannot explain expected returns. However, there is weak evidence that a conditional relation exits between beta and expected returns. Results of the time-series regression suggest that both CAPM and three factor model do well in explaining expected returns. However, GRS-based test of regression intercepts and regressions R2 indicate that Fama and French model better captures variations in observed stock returns than the CAPM.
topic CAPM, Risk and returns, Time series regression, Fama and French (1993) three factor model, Pakistan Stock Exchange
url https://www.publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/1592
work_keys_str_mv AT syedhamidalishah theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT attaullahshah theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT hamidullah theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT muhammadkamrankhan theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT syedhamidalishah riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT attaullahshah riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT hamidullah riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
AT muhammadkamrankhan riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket
_version_ 1724215240434909184