The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market
In this study, we try to answer several empirical questions related to testing of asset pricing models in Pakistan. First, we test the assumptions of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using cross-sectional regression methodology of Fama and MacBeth (FMB) (1973). Second, we test the conditional rel...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CSRC Publishing
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/1592 |
id |
doaj-3d6775c6352b448096454128e07d4d2d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3d6775c6352b448096454128e07d4d2d2021-03-18T20:24:39ZengCSRC PublishingJournal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies2519-03182518-84882021-01-0171The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock MarketSyed Hamid Ali Shah0Attaullah Shah1Hamid Ullah2Muhammad Kamran Khan3Quaid-e-Azam College of Commerce, University of Peshawar, PakistanInstitute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, PakistanIslamia College University, Peshawar, PakistanBacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan In this study, we try to answer several empirical questions related to testing of asset pricing models in Pakistan. First, we test the assumptions of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using cross-sectional regression methodology of Fama and MacBeth (FMB) (1973). Second, we test the conditional relationship between beta and expected returns using FMB cross-sectional regressions. Third, we test and compare the explanatory power of CAPM and Fama and French (1993) three factor models using time-series regressions. For all of the above empirical tests, we use sufficiently large data set of weekly data from January 2006 to December 2018 of non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Results of the cross-sectional regressions suggest that beta cannot explain expected returns. However, there is weak evidence that a conditional relation exits between beta and expected returns. Results of the time-series regression suggest that both CAPM and three factor model do well in explaining expected returns. However, GRS-based test of regression intercepts and regressions R2 indicate that Fama and French model better captures variations in observed stock returns than the CAPM. https://www.publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/1592CAPM, Risk and returns, Time series regression, Fama and French (1993) three factor model, Pakistan Stock Exchange |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Syed Hamid Ali Shah Attaullah Shah Hamid Ullah Muhammad Kamran Khan |
spellingShingle |
Syed Hamid Ali Shah Attaullah Shah Hamid Ullah Muhammad Kamran Khan The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies CAPM, Risk and returns, Time series regression, Fama and French (1993) three factor model, Pakistan Stock Exchange |
author_facet |
Syed Hamid Ali Shah Attaullah Shah Hamid Ullah Muhammad Kamran Khan |
author_sort |
Syed Hamid Ali Shah |
title |
The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market |
title_short |
The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market |
title_full |
The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market |
title_fullStr |
The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Risk and Return Relations: New Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market |
title_sort |
risk and return relations: new evidence from pakistani stock market |
publisher |
CSRC Publishing |
series |
Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies |
issn |
2519-0318 2518-8488 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
In this study, we try to answer several empirical questions related to testing of asset pricing models in Pakistan. First, we test the assumptions of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using cross-sectional regression methodology of Fama and MacBeth (FMB) (1973). Second, we test the conditional relationship between beta and expected returns using FMB cross-sectional regressions. Third, we test and compare the explanatory power of CAPM and Fama and French (1993) three factor models using time-series regressions. For all of the above empirical tests, we use sufficiently large data set of weekly data from January 2006 to December 2018 of non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Results of the cross-sectional regressions suggest that beta cannot explain expected returns. However, there is weak evidence that a conditional relation exits between beta and expected returns. Results of the time-series regression suggest that both CAPM and three factor model do well in explaining expected returns. However, GRS-based test of regression intercepts and regressions R2 indicate that Fama and French model better captures variations in observed stock returns than the CAPM.
|
topic |
CAPM, Risk and returns, Time series regression, Fama and French (1993) three factor model, Pakistan Stock Exchange |
url |
https://www.publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/1592 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT syedhamidalishah theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT attaullahshah theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT hamidullah theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT muhammadkamrankhan theriskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT syedhamidalishah riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT attaullahshah riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT hamidullah riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket AT muhammadkamrankhan riskandreturnrelationsnewevidencefrompakistanistockmarket |
_version_ |
1724215240434909184 |