Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation

Purpose. To assess early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or standard instrumentation TKA using a medial parapatellar or subvastus approach. Methods. A prospective controlled trial of 70 consecutive patients undergoing TKA with a low cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P Weinrauch, N Myers, M Wilkinson, J Dodsworth, P Fitzpatrick, S Whitehouse
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2006-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900601400111
id doaj-3d500c585e07446ab149101359387808
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d500c585e07446ab1491013593878082020-11-25T03:22:13ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902006-04-011410.1177/230949900601400111Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and InstrumentationP WeinrauchN MyersM WilkinsonJ DodsworthP FitzpatrickS WhitehousePurpose. To assess early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or standard instrumentation TKA using a medial parapatellar or subvastus approach. Methods. A prospective controlled trial of 70 consecutive patients undergoing TKA with a low contact stress rotating platform prosthesis was conducted. Patients were randomised to receive surgery with either computer navigation or standard instrumentation. A medial parapatellar or subvastus approach was used according to the surgeons' preference. Outcome measures included preoperative knee function, intra-operative factors, and postoperative rehabilitation. Results. Duration of surgery was significantly longer when using computer navigation; however, operating time decreased with greater experience. A higher incidence and duration of early postoperative quadriceps dysfunction was associated with computer-assisted TKA through the medial parapatellar approach than through the subvastus approach or TKA performed with standard instrumentation. No patient who received surgery through the subvastus approach had a lag of more than 20 degrees, at 48 hours postoperatively, regardless of the instrumentation used. Conclusion. Computer-assisted TKA through a medial parapatellar approach was associated with delayed recovery of the quadriceps during early postoperative rehabilitation. This was due to the additional quadriceps dissection required to place the femoral tracking array. The subvastus approach is therefore recommended for computer-assisted TKA.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900601400111
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P Weinrauch
N Myers
M Wilkinson
J Dodsworth
P Fitzpatrick
S Whitehouse
spellingShingle P Weinrauch
N Myers
M Wilkinson
J Dodsworth
P Fitzpatrick
S Whitehouse
Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet P Weinrauch
N Myers
M Wilkinson
J Dodsworth
P Fitzpatrick
S Whitehouse
author_sort P Weinrauch
title Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation
title_short Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation
title_full Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation
title_fullStr Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Surgical Approaches and Instrumentation
title_sort comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2006-04-01
description Purpose. To assess early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or standard instrumentation TKA using a medial parapatellar or subvastus approach. Methods. A prospective controlled trial of 70 consecutive patients undergoing TKA with a low contact stress rotating platform prosthesis was conducted. Patients were randomised to receive surgery with either computer navigation or standard instrumentation. A medial parapatellar or subvastus approach was used according to the surgeons' preference. Outcome measures included preoperative knee function, intra-operative factors, and postoperative rehabilitation. Results. Duration of surgery was significantly longer when using computer navigation; however, operating time decreased with greater experience. A higher incidence and duration of early postoperative quadriceps dysfunction was associated with computer-assisted TKA through the medial parapatellar approach than through the subvastus approach or TKA performed with standard instrumentation. No patient who received surgery through the subvastus approach had a lag of more than 20 degrees, at 48 hours postoperatively, regardless of the instrumentation used. Conclusion. Computer-assisted TKA through a medial parapatellar approach was associated with delayed recovery of the quadriceps during early postoperative rehabilitation. This was due to the additional quadriceps dissection required to place the femoral tracking array. The subvastus approach is therefore recommended for computer-assisted TKA.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900601400111
work_keys_str_mv AT pweinrauch comparisonofearlypostoperativerehabilitationoutcomefollowingtotalkneearthroplastyusingdifferentsurgicalapproachesandinstrumentation
AT nmyers comparisonofearlypostoperativerehabilitationoutcomefollowingtotalkneearthroplastyusingdifferentsurgicalapproachesandinstrumentation
AT mwilkinson comparisonofearlypostoperativerehabilitationoutcomefollowingtotalkneearthroplastyusingdifferentsurgicalapproachesandinstrumentation
AT jdodsworth comparisonofearlypostoperativerehabilitationoutcomefollowingtotalkneearthroplastyusingdifferentsurgicalapproachesandinstrumentation
AT pfitzpatrick comparisonofearlypostoperativerehabilitationoutcomefollowingtotalkneearthroplastyusingdifferentsurgicalapproachesandinstrumentation
AT swhitehouse comparisonofearlypostoperativerehabilitationoutcomefollowingtotalkneearthroplastyusingdifferentsurgicalapproachesandinstrumentation
_version_ 1724610597958451200