A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.

Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri are two very closely related invasive ant species; however, S. invicta is a much more successful invader. Physiological tolerance to abiotic stress has been hypothesized to be important to the success of an invasive species. In this study, we tested the hyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian Chen, Tahir Rashid, Guolei Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24915009/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-3d40c13dce4a48318eaa4519c06b131e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d40c13dce4a48318eaa4519c06b131e2021-03-04T09:19:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9684210.1371/journal.pone.0096842A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.Jian ChenTahir RashidGuolei FengSolenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri are two very closely related invasive ant species; however, S. invicta is a much more successful invader. Physiological tolerance to abiotic stress has been hypothesized to be important to the success of an invasive species. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that S. invicta is more tolerant to heat and desiccation stress than S. richteri. The data strongly support our hypothesis. S. invicta was found to be significantly less vulnerable than S. richteri to both heat and desiccation stress. Despite S. richteri having significantly higher body water content, S. invicta was less sensitive to desiccation stress due to its significantly lower water loss rate (higher desiccation resistance). After the cuticular lipid was removed, S. invicta still had a significantly lower water loss rate than S. richteri, indicating that cuticular lipids were not the only factors accounting for difference in the desiccation resistance between these two species. Since multiple biological and/or ecological traits can contribute to the invasion success of a particular species, whether the observed difference in tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses is indeed associated with the variation in invasion success between these two species can only be confirmed by further extensive comparative study.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24915009/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jian Chen
Tahir Rashid
Guolei Feng
spellingShingle Jian Chen
Tahir Rashid
Guolei Feng
A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jian Chen
Tahir Rashid
Guolei Feng
author_sort Jian Chen
title A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
title_short A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
title_full A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
title_fullStr A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study between Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
title_sort comparative study between solenopsis invicta and solenopsis richteri on tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri are two very closely related invasive ant species; however, S. invicta is a much more successful invader. Physiological tolerance to abiotic stress has been hypothesized to be important to the success of an invasive species. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that S. invicta is more tolerant to heat and desiccation stress than S. richteri. The data strongly support our hypothesis. S. invicta was found to be significantly less vulnerable than S. richteri to both heat and desiccation stress. Despite S. richteri having significantly higher body water content, S. invicta was less sensitive to desiccation stress due to its significantly lower water loss rate (higher desiccation resistance). After the cuticular lipid was removed, S. invicta still had a significantly lower water loss rate than S. richteri, indicating that cuticular lipids were not the only factors accounting for difference in the desiccation resistance between these two species. Since multiple biological and/or ecological traits can contribute to the invasion success of a particular species, whether the observed difference in tolerance to heat and desiccation stresses is indeed associated with the variation in invasion success between these two species can only be confirmed by further extensive comparative study.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24915009/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT jianchen acomparativestudybetweensolenopsisinvictaandsolenopsisrichteriontolerancetoheatanddesiccationstresses
AT tahirrashid acomparativestudybetweensolenopsisinvictaandsolenopsisrichteriontolerancetoheatanddesiccationstresses
AT guoleifeng acomparativestudybetweensolenopsisinvictaandsolenopsisrichteriontolerancetoheatanddesiccationstresses
AT jianchen comparativestudybetweensolenopsisinvictaandsolenopsisrichteriontolerancetoheatanddesiccationstresses
AT tahirrashid comparativestudybetweensolenopsisinvictaandsolenopsisrichteriontolerancetoheatanddesiccationstresses
AT guoleifeng comparativestudybetweensolenopsisinvictaandsolenopsisrichteriontolerancetoheatanddesiccationstresses
_version_ 1714807166704025600