Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs

Abstract Background Serum creatinine and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) are used as surrogate markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical practice. Data pertaining to the correlations between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine in client‐owned dogs are limited. Objectives To describe the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Myles McKenna, Ludovic Pelligand, Jonathan Elliott, Daniel Cotter, Rosanne Jepson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15659
id doaj-3d3e7219c0544332afd0c2cf70a9f2f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d3e7219c0544332afd0c2cf70a9f2f32020-11-25T02:55:59ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762020-01-0134118619410.1111/jvim.15659Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogsMyles McKenna0Ludovic Pelligand1Jonathan Elliott2Daniel Cotter3Rosanne Jepson4Department of Clinical Science and Services Royal Veterinary College London United KingdomDepartment of Clinical Science and Services Royal Veterinary College London United KingdomDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences Royal Veterinary College London United KingdomDepartment of Clinical Science and Services Royal Veterinary College London United KingdomDepartment of Clinical Science and Services Royal Veterinary College London United KingdomAbstract Background Serum creatinine and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) are used as surrogate markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical practice. Data pertaining to the correlations between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine in client‐owned dogs are limited. Objectives To describe the relationship between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine in a population of client‐owned dogs, and to compare clinical utility of SDMA to GFR estimation for detecting pre‐azotemic chronic kidney disease. Animals Medical records of 119 dogs that had GFR estimation performed via serum iohexol clearance between 2012 and 2017. Methods Prospective study using archived samples. GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine results were reviewed and submitting practices contacted for outcome data. All dogs included in the study population were non‐azotemic. Correlations between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine were determined by regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of different cutoffs for SDMA and serum creatinine for detecting decreased GFR were calculated, using a 95% confidence interval. Results Serum creatinine and SDMA were moderately correlated with GFR (R2 = 0.52 and 0.27, respectively, P < .0001) and with each other (R2 = 0.33, P < .0001). SDMA >14 μg/dL was sensitive (90%) but nonspecific (50%) for detecting a ≥40% decrease in GFR. Optimal SDMA concentration cutoff for detecting a ≥40% GFR decrease was >18 μg/dL (sensitivity 90%, specificity 83%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance In non‐azotemic dogs being screened for decreased renal function, using a cutoff of >18 μg/dL rather than >14 μg/dL increases the specificity of SDMA, without compromising sensitivity.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15659caninediagnosisglomerular filtration raterenal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Myles McKenna
Ludovic Pelligand
Jonathan Elliott
Daniel Cotter
Rosanne Jepson
spellingShingle Myles McKenna
Ludovic Pelligand
Jonathan Elliott
Daniel Cotter
Rosanne Jepson
Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
canine
diagnosis
glomerular filtration rate
renal
author_facet Myles McKenna
Ludovic Pelligand
Jonathan Elliott
Daniel Cotter
Rosanne Jepson
author_sort Myles McKenna
title Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
title_short Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
title_full Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
title_fullStr Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum SDMA concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
title_sort relationship between serum iohexol clearance, serum sdma concentration, and serum creatinine concentration in non‐azotemic dogs
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Background Serum creatinine and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) are used as surrogate markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical practice. Data pertaining to the correlations between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine in client‐owned dogs are limited. Objectives To describe the relationship between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine in a population of client‐owned dogs, and to compare clinical utility of SDMA to GFR estimation for detecting pre‐azotemic chronic kidney disease. Animals Medical records of 119 dogs that had GFR estimation performed via serum iohexol clearance between 2012 and 2017. Methods Prospective study using archived samples. GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine results were reviewed and submitting practices contacted for outcome data. All dogs included in the study population were non‐azotemic. Correlations between GFR, SDMA, and serum creatinine were determined by regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of different cutoffs for SDMA and serum creatinine for detecting decreased GFR were calculated, using a 95% confidence interval. Results Serum creatinine and SDMA were moderately correlated with GFR (R2 = 0.52 and 0.27, respectively, P < .0001) and with each other (R2 = 0.33, P < .0001). SDMA >14 μg/dL was sensitive (90%) but nonspecific (50%) for detecting a ≥40% decrease in GFR. Optimal SDMA concentration cutoff for detecting a ≥40% GFR decrease was >18 μg/dL (sensitivity 90%, specificity 83%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance In non‐azotemic dogs being screened for decreased renal function, using a cutoff of >18 μg/dL rather than >14 μg/dL increases the specificity of SDMA, without compromising sensitivity.
topic canine
diagnosis
glomerular filtration rate
renal
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15659
work_keys_str_mv AT mylesmckenna relationshipbetweenserumiohexolclearanceserumsdmaconcentrationandserumcreatinineconcentrationinnonazotemicdogs
AT ludovicpelligand relationshipbetweenserumiohexolclearanceserumsdmaconcentrationandserumcreatinineconcentrationinnonazotemicdogs
AT jonathanelliott relationshipbetweenserumiohexolclearanceserumsdmaconcentrationandserumcreatinineconcentrationinnonazotemicdogs
AT danielcotter relationshipbetweenserumiohexolclearanceserumsdmaconcentrationandserumcreatinineconcentrationinnonazotemicdogs
AT rosannejepson relationshipbetweenserumiohexolclearanceserumsdmaconcentrationandserumcreatinineconcentrationinnonazotemicdogs
_version_ 1724714891645812736