Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Accurate genetic maps are required for successful and efficient linkage mapping of disease genes. However, most available genome-wide genetic maps were built using only small collections of pedigrees, and therefore have large samplin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buyske Steven, Weeks Daniel E, He Chunsheng, Abecasis Goncalo R, Stewart William C, Matise Tara C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Genetics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/12/15
id doaj-3d21f6bc9f154fc79f6ea2dec349747b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d21f6bc9f154fc79f6ea2dec349747b2021-04-02T06:33:25ZengBMCBMC Medical Genetics1471-23502011-01-011211510.1186/1471-2350-12-15Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisonsBuyske StevenWeeks Daniel EHe ChunshengAbecasis Goncalo RStewart William CMatise Tara C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Accurate genetic maps are required for successful and efficient linkage mapping of disease genes. However, most available genome-wide genetic maps were built using only small collections of pedigrees, and therefore have large sampling errors. A large set of genetic studies genotyped by the NHLBI Mammalian Genotyping Service (MGS) provide appropriate data for generating more accurate maps.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We collected a large sample of uncleaned genotype data for 461 markers generated by the MGS using the Weber screening sets 9 and 10. This collection includes genotypes for over 4,400 pedigrees containing over 17,000 genotyped individuals from different populations. We identified and cleaned numerous relationship and genotyping errors, as well as verified the marker orders. We used this dataset to test for population-specific genetic maps, and to re-estimate the genetic map distances with greater precision; standard errors for all intervals are provided. The map-interval sizes from the European (or European descent), Chinese, and Hispanic samples are in quite good agreement with each other. We found one map interval on chromosome 8p with a statistically significant size difference between the European and Chinese samples, and several map intervals with significant size differences between the African American and Chinese samples. When comparing Palauan with European samples, a statistically significant difference was detected at the telomeric region of chromosome 11p. Several significant differences were also identified between populations in chromosomal and genome lengths.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our new population-specific screening set maps can be used to improve the accuracy of disease-mapping studies. As a result of the large sample size, the average length of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for a 10 cM map interval is only 2.4 cM, which is considerably smaller than on previously published maps.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/12/15
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Buyske Steven
Weeks Daniel E
He Chunsheng
Abecasis Goncalo R
Stewart William C
Matise Tara C
spellingShingle Buyske Steven
Weeks Daniel E
He Chunsheng
Abecasis Goncalo R
Stewart William C
Matise Tara C
Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
BMC Medical Genetics
author_facet Buyske Steven
Weeks Daniel E
He Chunsheng
Abecasis Goncalo R
Stewart William C
Matise Tara C
author_sort Buyske Steven
title Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
title_short Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
title_full Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
title_fullStr Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
title_sort enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Genetics
issn 1471-2350
publishDate 2011-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Accurate genetic maps are required for successful and efficient linkage mapping of disease genes. However, most available genome-wide genetic maps were built using only small collections of pedigrees, and therefore have large sampling errors. A large set of genetic studies genotyped by the NHLBI Mammalian Genotyping Service (MGS) provide appropriate data for generating more accurate maps.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We collected a large sample of uncleaned genotype data for 461 markers generated by the MGS using the Weber screening sets 9 and 10. This collection includes genotypes for over 4,400 pedigrees containing over 17,000 genotyped individuals from different populations. We identified and cleaned numerous relationship and genotyping errors, as well as verified the marker orders. We used this dataset to test for population-specific genetic maps, and to re-estimate the genetic map distances with greater precision; standard errors for all intervals are provided. The map-interval sizes from the European (or European descent), Chinese, and Hispanic samples are in quite good agreement with each other. We found one map interval on chromosome 8p with a statistically significant size difference between the European and Chinese samples, and several map intervals with significant size differences between the African American and Chinese samples. When comparing Palauan with European samples, a statistically significant difference was detected at the telomeric region of chromosome 11p. Several significant differences were also identified between populations in chromosomal and genome lengths.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our new population-specific screening set maps can be used to improve the accuracy of disease-mapping studies. As a result of the large sample size, the average length of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for a 10 cM map interval is only 2.4 cM, which is considerably smaller than on previously published maps.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/12/15
work_keys_str_mv AT buyskesteven enhancedgeneticmapsfromfamilybaseddiseasestudiespopulationspecificcomparisons
AT weeksdaniele enhancedgeneticmapsfromfamilybaseddiseasestudiespopulationspecificcomparisons
AT hechunsheng enhancedgeneticmapsfromfamilybaseddiseasestudiespopulationspecificcomparisons
AT abecasisgoncalor enhancedgeneticmapsfromfamilybaseddiseasestudiespopulationspecificcomparisons
AT stewartwilliamc enhancedgeneticmapsfromfamilybaseddiseasestudiespopulationspecificcomparisons
AT matisetarac enhancedgeneticmapsfromfamilybaseddiseasestudiespopulationspecificcomparisons
_version_ 1724171846275825664