Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves
This article examines the mechanisms for cross-border interchange of the regulating reserves (RRs), i.e., the imbalance-netting process (INP) and the cross-border activation of the RRs (CBRR). Both mechanisms are an additional service of frequency restoration reserves in the power system and connect...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8188 |
id |
doaj-3d1cc97210ca400ea262c6b0907df2d5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3d1cc97210ca400ea262c6b0907df2d52021-09-09T13:39:42ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-09-01118188818810.3390/app11178188Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating ReservesMarcel Topler0Boštjan Polajžer1Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, SloveniaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, SloveniaThis article examines the mechanisms for cross-border interchange of the regulating reserves (RRs), i.e., the imbalance-netting process (INP) and the cross-border activation of the RRs (CBRR). Both mechanisms are an additional service of frequency restoration reserves in the power system and connect different control areas (CAs) via virtual tie-lines to release RRs and reduce balancing energy. The primary objective of the INP is to net the demand for RRs between the cooperating CAs with different signs of interchange power variation. In contrast, the primary objective of the CBRR is to activate the RRs in the cooperating CAs with matching signs of interchange power variation. In this way, the ancillary services market and the European balancing system should be improved. However, both the INP and CBRR include a frequency term and thus impact the frequency response of the cooperating CAs. Therefore, the impact of the simultaneous operation of the INP and CBRR on the load-frequency control (LFC) and performance is comprehensively evaluated with dynamic simulations of a three-CA testing system, which no previous studies investigated before. In addition, a function for correction power adjustment is proposed to prevent the undesirable simultaneous activation of the INP and CBRR. In this way, area control error (ACE) and scheduled control power are decreased since undesired correction is prevented. The dynamic simulations confirmed that the simultaneous operation of the INP and CBRR reduced the balancing energy and decreased the unintended exchange of energy. Consequently, the LFC and performance were improved in this way. However, the impact of the INP and CBRR on the frequency quality has no unambiguous conclusions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8188frequency qualityload-frequency controlregulating reservescross-border interchangecross-border activation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marcel Topler Boštjan Polajžer |
spellingShingle |
Marcel Topler Boštjan Polajžer Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves Applied Sciences frequency quality load-frequency control regulating reserves cross-border interchange cross-border activation |
author_facet |
Marcel Topler Boštjan Polajžer |
author_sort |
Marcel Topler |
title |
Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves |
title_short |
Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves |
title_full |
Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves |
title_sort |
evaluation of the simultaneous operation of the mechanisms for cross-border interchange and activation of the regulating reserves |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
This article examines the mechanisms for cross-border interchange of the regulating reserves (RRs), i.e., the imbalance-netting process (INP) and the cross-border activation of the RRs (CBRR). Both mechanisms are an additional service of frequency restoration reserves in the power system and connect different control areas (CAs) via virtual tie-lines to release RRs and reduce balancing energy. The primary objective of the INP is to net the demand for RRs between the cooperating CAs with different signs of interchange power variation. In contrast, the primary objective of the CBRR is to activate the RRs in the cooperating CAs with matching signs of interchange power variation. In this way, the ancillary services market and the European balancing system should be improved. However, both the INP and CBRR include a frequency term and thus impact the frequency response of the cooperating CAs. Therefore, the impact of the simultaneous operation of the INP and CBRR on the load-frequency control (LFC) and performance is comprehensively evaluated with dynamic simulations of a three-CA testing system, which no previous studies investigated before. In addition, a function for correction power adjustment is proposed to prevent the undesirable simultaneous activation of the INP and CBRR. In this way, area control error (ACE) and scheduled control power are decreased since undesired correction is prevented. The dynamic simulations confirmed that the simultaneous operation of the INP and CBRR reduced the balancing energy and decreased the unintended exchange of energy. Consequently, the LFC and performance were improved in this way. However, the impact of the INP and CBRR on the frequency quality has no unambiguous conclusions. |
topic |
frequency quality load-frequency control regulating reserves cross-border interchange cross-border activation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8188 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marceltopler evaluationofthesimultaneousoperationofthemechanismsforcrossborderinterchangeandactivationoftheregulatingreserves AT bostjanpolajzer evaluationofthesimultaneousoperationofthemechanismsforcrossborderinterchangeandactivationoftheregulatingreserves |
_version_ |
1717760718857568256 |