Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification

Accurate and automatic railhead inspection is crucial for the operational safety of railway systems. Deep learning on visual images is effective in the automatic detection of railhead defects, but either intensive data requirements or ignoring defect sizes reduce its applicability. This paper develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yang Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/1957
id doaj-3d187a494c974f58b933fc972476eb99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d187a494c974f58b933fc972476eb992021-04-14T23:00:56ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-04-01141957195710.3390/ma14081957Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect IdentificationYang Jin0Department of Structural Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Postbus 5, 2600 AA Delft, The NetherlandsAccurate and automatic railhead inspection is crucial for the operational safety of railway systems. Deep learning on visual images is effective in the automatic detection of railhead defects, but either intensive data requirements or ignoring defect sizes reduce its applicability. This paper developed a machine learning framework based on wavelet scattering networks (WSNs) and neural networks (NNs) for identifying railhead defects. WSNs are functionally equivalent to deep convolutional neural networks while containing no parameters, thus suitable for non-intensive datasets. NNs can restore location and size information. The publicly available rail surface discrete defects (RSDD) datasets were analyzed, including 67 Type-I railhead images acquired from express tracks and 128 Type-II images captured from ordinary/heavy haul tracks. The ultimate validation accuracy reached 99.80% and 99.44%, respectively. WSNs can extract implicit signal features, and the support vector machine classifier can improve the learning accuracy of NNs by over 6%. Three criteria, namely the precision, recall, and F-measure, were calculated for comparison with the literature. At the pixel level, the developed approach achieved three criteria of around 90%, outperforming former methods. At the defect level, the recall rates reached 100%, indicating all labeled defects were identified. The precision rates were around 75%, affected by the insignificant misidentified speckles (smaller than 20 pixels). Nonetheless, the developed learning framework was effective in identifying railhead defects.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/1957wavelet scattering networksneural networksrailhead defect identificationmachine learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yang Jin
spellingShingle Yang Jin
Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification
Materials
wavelet scattering networks
neural networks
railhead defect identification
machine learning
author_facet Yang Jin
author_sort Yang Jin
title Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification
title_short Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification
title_full Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification
title_fullStr Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification
title_full_unstemmed Wavelet Scattering and Neural Networks for Railhead Defect Identification
title_sort wavelet scattering and neural networks for railhead defect identification
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Accurate and automatic railhead inspection is crucial for the operational safety of railway systems. Deep learning on visual images is effective in the automatic detection of railhead defects, but either intensive data requirements or ignoring defect sizes reduce its applicability. This paper developed a machine learning framework based on wavelet scattering networks (WSNs) and neural networks (NNs) for identifying railhead defects. WSNs are functionally equivalent to deep convolutional neural networks while containing no parameters, thus suitable for non-intensive datasets. NNs can restore location and size information. The publicly available rail surface discrete defects (RSDD) datasets were analyzed, including 67 Type-I railhead images acquired from express tracks and 128 Type-II images captured from ordinary/heavy haul tracks. The ultimate validation accuracy reached 99.80% and 99.44%, respectively. WSNs can extract implicit signal features, and the support vector machine classifier can improve the learning accuracy of NNs by over 6%. Three criteria, namely the precision, recall, and F-measure, were calculated for comparison with the literature. At the pixel level, the developed approach achieved three criteria of around 90%, outperforming former methods. At the defect level, the recall rates reached 100%, indicating all labeled defects were identified. The precision rates were around 75%, affected by the insignificant misidentified speckles (smaller than 20 pixels). Nonetheless, the developed learning framework was effective in identifying railhead defects.
topic wavelet scattering networks
neural networks
railhead defect identification
machine learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/1957
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjin waveletscatteringandneuralnetworksforrailheaddefectidentification
_version_ 1721526895317614592