Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study

Abstract Background User interface (UI) design features such as screen layout, density of information, and use of colour may affect the usability of electronic prescribing (EP) systems, with usability problems previously associated with medication errors. To identify how to improve existing systems,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Aufegger, Naresh Serou, Shiping Chen, Bryony Dean Franklin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-1080-9
id doaj-3d10d0c3844740179321e12ce7faf3a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d10d0c3844740179321e12ce7faf3a22020-11-25T02:54:59ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472020-04-012011810.1186/s12911-020-1080-9Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods studyLisa Aufegger0Naresh Serou1Shiping Chen2Bryony Dean Franklin3NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College LondonNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College LondonTsinghua UniversityNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College LondonAbstract Background User interface (UI) design features such as screen layout, density of information, and use of colour may affect the usability of electronic prescribing (EP) systems, with usability problems previously associated with medication errors. To identify how to improve existing systems, our aim was to explore prescribers’ perspectives of UI features of a commercially available EP system, and how these may affect patient safety. Methods Two studies were conducted, each including ten participants prescribing a penicillin for a test patient with a penicillin allergy. In study 1, eye-gaze tracking was used as a means to explore visual attention and behaviour during prescribing, followed by a self-reported EP system usability scale. In study 2, a think-aloud method and semi-structured interview were applied to explore participants’ thoughts and views on prescribing, with a focus on UI design and patient safety. Results Study 1 showed high visual attention toward information on allergies and patient information, allergy pop-up alerts, and medication order review and confirmation, with less visual attention on adding medication. The system’s usability was rated ‘below average’. In study 2, participants highlighted EP design features and workflow, including screen layout and information overload as being important for patient safety, benefits of EP systems such as keeping a record of relevant information, and suggestions for improvement in relation to system design (colour, fonts, customization) and patient interaction. Conclusions Specific UI design factors were identified that may improve the usability and/or safety of EP systems. It is suggested that eye-gaze tracking and think-aloud methods are used in future experimental research in this area. Limitations include the small sample size; further work should include similar studies on other EP systems.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-1080-9Electronic prescribing systemUser experienceUser interfaceEye-trackingThink-aloud method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa Aufegger
Naresh Serou
Shiping Chen
Bryony Dean Franklin
spellingShingle Lisa Aufegger
Naresh Serou
Shiping Chen
Bryony Dean Franklin
Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Electronic prescribing system
User experience
User interface
Eye-tracking
Think-aloud method
author_facet Lisa Aufegger
Naresh Serou
Shiping Chen
Bryony Dean Franklin
author_sort Lisa Aufegger
title Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
title_short Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
title_full Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
title_sort evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
issn 1472-6947
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Background User interface (UI) design features such as screen layout, density of information, and use of colour may affect the usability of electronic prescribing (EP) systems, with usability problems previously associated with medication errors. To identify how to improve existing systems, our aim was to explore prescribers’ perspectives of UI features of a commercially available EP system, and how these may affect patient safety. Methods Two studies were conducted, each including ten participants prescribing a penicillin for a test patient with a penicillin allergy. In study 1, eye-gaze tracking was used as a means to explore visual attention and behaviour during prescribing, followed by a self-reported EP system usability scale. In study 2, a think-aloud method and semi-structured interview were applied to explore participants’ thoughts and views on prescribing, with a focus on UI design and patient safety. Results Study 1 showed high visual attention toward information on allergies and patient information, allergy pop-up alerts, and medication order review and confirmation, with less visual attention on adding medication. The system’s usability was rated ‘below average’. In study 2, participants highlighted EP design features and workflow, including screen layout and information overload as being important for patient safety, benefits of EP systems such as keeping a record of relevant information, and suggestions for improvement in relation to system design (colour, fonts, customization) and patient interaction. Conclusions Specific UI design factors were identified that may improve the usability and/or safety of EP systems. It is suggested that eye-gaze tracking and think-aloud methods are used in future experimental research in this area. Limitations include the small sample size; further work should include similar studies on other EP systems.
topic Electronic prescribing system
User experience
User interface
Eye-tracking
Think-aloud method
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-1080-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lisaaufegger evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy
AT nareshserou evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy
AT shipingchen evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy
AT bryonydeanfranklin evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1724718679327768576