Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study
Abstract Background User interface (UI) design features such as screen layout, density of information, and use of colour may affect the usability of electronic prescribing (EP) systems, with usability problems previously associated with medication errors. To identify how to improve existing systems,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-1080-9 |
id |
doaj-3d10d0c3844740179321e12ce7faf3a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3d10d0c3844740179321e12ce7faf3a22020-11-25T02:54:59ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472020-04-012011810.1186/s12911-020-1080-9Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods studyLisa Aufegger0Naresh Serou1Shiping Chen2Bryony Dean Franklin3NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College LondonNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College LondonTsinghua UniversityNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College LondonAbstract Background User interface (UI) design features such as screen layout, density of information, and use of colour may affect the usability of electronic prescribing (EP) systems, with usability problems previously associated with medication errors. To identify how to improve existing systems, our aim was to explore prescribers’ perspectives of UI features of a commercially available EP system, and how these may affect patient safety. Methods Two studies were conducted, each including ten participants prescribing a penicillin for a test patient with a penicillin allergy. In study 1, eye-gaze tracking was used as a means to explore visual attention and behaviour during prescribing, followed by a self-reported EP system usability scale. In study 2, a think-aloud method and semi-structured interview were applied to explore participants’ thoughts and views on prescribing, with a focus on UI design and patient safety. Results Study 1 showed high visual attention toward information on allergies and patient information, allergy pop-up alerts, and medication order review and confirmation, with less visual attention on adding medication. The system’s usability was rated ‘below average’. In study 2, participants highlighted EP design features and workflow, including screen layout and information overload as being important for patient safety, benefits of EP systems such as keeping a record of relevant information, and suggestions for improvement in relation to system design (colour, fonts, customization) and patient interaction. Conclusions Specific UI design factors were identified that may improve the usability and/or safety of EP systems. It is suggested that eye-gaze tracking and think-aloud methods are used in future experimental research in this area. Limitations include the small sample size; further work should include similar studies on other EP systems.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-1080-9Electronic prescribing systemUser experienceUser interfaceEye-trackingThink-aloud method |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lisa Aufegger Naresh Serou Shiping Chen Bryony Dean Franklin |
spellingShingle |
Lisa Aufegger Naresh Serou Shiping Chen Bryony Dean Franklin Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Electronic prescribing system User experience User interface Eye-tracking Think-aloud method |
author_facet |
Lisa Aufegger Naresh Serou Shiping Chen Bryony Dean Franklin |
author_sort |
Lisa Aufegger |
title |
Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study |
title_short |
Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study |
title_full |
Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study |
title_sort |
evaluating users’ experiences of electronic prescribing systems in relation to patient safety: a mixed methods study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
issn |
1472-6947 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background User interface (UI) design features such as screen layout, density of information, and use of colour may affect the usability of electronic prescribing (EP) systems, with usability problems previously associated with medication errors. To identify how to improve existing systems, our aim was to explore prescribers’ perspectives of UI features of a commercially available EP system, and how these may affect patient safety. Methods Two studies were conducted, each including ten participants prescribing a penicillin for a test patient with a penicillin allergy. In study 1, eye-gaze tracking was used as a means to explore visual attention and behaviour during prescribing, followed by a self-reported EP system usability scale. In study 2, a think-aloud method and semi-structured interview were applied to explore participants’ thoughts and views on prescribing, with a focus on UI design and patient safety. Results Study 1 showed high visual attention toward information on allergies and patient information, allergy pop-up alerts, and medication order review and confirmation, with less visual attention on adding medication. The system’s usability was rated ‘below average’. In study 2, participants highlighted EP design features and workflow, including screen layout and information overload as being important for patient safety, benefits of EP systems such as keeping a record of relevant information, and suggestions for improvement in relation to system design (colour, fonts, customization) and patient interaction. Conclusions Specific UI design factors were identified that may improve the usability and/or safety of EP systems. It is suggested that eye-gaze tracking and think-aloud methods are used in future experimental research in this area. Limitations include the small sample size; further work should include similar studies on other EP systems. |
topic |
Electronic prescribing system User experience User interface Eye-tracking Think-aloud method |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-020-1080-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lisaaufegger evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy AT nareshserou evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy AT shipingchen evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy AT bryonydeanfranklin evaluatingusersexperiencesofelectronicprescribingsystemsinrelationtopatientsafetyamixedmethodsstudy |
_version_ |
1724718679327768576 |