Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer

Objective. The incidence/death rate of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is increasing in America, and it is unclear if access to care contributes to this increase. Design/Patients. 575 HCC cases were reviewed for demographics, education, and tumor size. Main Outcome Measures. Endpoints to determine acces...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linda L. Wong, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Cheryl L. Albright
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/870659
id doaj-3d0d0f02d53342d492950bcb757aeeb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d0d0f02d53342d492950bcb757aeeb92020-11-24T22:52:44ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Transplantation2090-00072090-00152012-01-01201210.1155/2012/870659870659Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular CancerLinda L. Wong0Brenda Y. Hernandez1Cheryl L. Albright2Transplant Center, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USACancer Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USACancer Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USAObjective. The incidence/death rate of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is increasing in America, and it is unclear if access to care contributes to this increase. Design/Patients. 575 HCC cases were reviewed for demographics, education, and tumor size. Main Outcome Measures. Endpoints to determine access to HCC care included whether an eligible patient underwent liver transplantation. Results. Transplant patients versus those not transplanted were younger (55.7 versus 61.8 yrs, P<0.001), males (89.3% versus 74.4%, P=0.013), and having completed high school (10.1% versus 1.2%, P=0.016). There were differences in transplant by ethnicity, insurance, and occupation. Transplant patients with HCC had higher median income via census classification ($54,383 versus $49,383, P=0.046) and self-reported income ($48,948 versus $38,800, P=0.002). Differences in access may be related to exclusion criteria for liver transplant, as Pacific Islanders were more likely to have tumor size larger than 5 cm compared to Whites and have BMI > 35 (20.7%) compared to Whites (6.4%) and Asians (4.7%). Conclusions. Ethnic differences in access to transplant are associated with socioeconomic status and factors that can disqualify patients (advanced disease/morbid obesity). Efforts to overcome educational barriers and screening for HCC could improve access to transplant.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/870659
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linda L. Wong
Brenda Y. Hernandez
Cheryl L. Albright
spellingShingle Linda L. Wong
Brenda Y. Hernandez
Cheryl L. Albright
Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer
Journal of Transplantation
author_facet Linda L. Wong
Brenda Y. Hernandez
Cheryl L. Albright
author_sort Linda L. Wong
title Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer
title_short Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer
title_full Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Factors Affect Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Cancer
title_sort socioeconomic factors affect disparities in access to liver transplant for hepatocellular cancer
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Transplantation
issn 2090-0007
2090-0015
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objective. The incidence/death rate of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is increasing in America, and it is unclear if access to care contributes to this increase. Design/Patients. 575 HCC cases were reviewed for demographics, education, and tumor size. Main Outcome Measures. Endpoints to determine access to HCC care included whether an eligible patient underwent liver transplantation. Results. Transplant patients versus those not transplanted were younger (55.7 versus 61.8 yrs, P<0.001), males (89.3% versus 74.4%, P=0.013), and having completed high school (10.1% versus 1.2%, P=0.016). There were differences in transplant by ethnicity, insurance, and occupation. Transplant patients with HCC had higher median income via census classification ($54,383 versus $49,383, P=0.046) and self-reported income ($48,948 versus $38,800, P=0.002). Differences in access may be related to exclusion criteria for liver transplant, as Pacific Islanders were more likely to have tumor size larger than 5 cm compared to Whites and have BMI > 35 (20.7%) compared to Whites (6.4%) and Asians (4.7%). Conclusions. Ethnic differences in access to transplant are associated with socioeconomic status and factors that can disqualify patients (advanced disease/morbid obesity). Efforts to overcome educational barriers and screening for HCC could improve access to transplant.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/870659
work_keys_str_mv AT lindalwong socioeconomicfactorsaffectdisparitiesinaccesstolivertransplantforhepatocellularcancer
AT brendayhernandez socioeconomicfactorsaffectdisparitiesinaccesstolivertransplantforhepatocellularcancer
AT cheryllalbright socioeconomicfactorsaffectdisparitiesinaccesstolivertransplantforhepatocellularcancer
_version_ 1725664694203580416