Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
Background: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a u...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185 |
id |
doaj-3d0b3a38d83a4becb06f7a5573d9f210 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3d0b3a38d83a4becb06f7a5573d9f2102020-11-25T03:43:55ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology2333-39282015-12-01210.1177/233339281562018510.1177_2333392815620185Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and ConditionsCaterina Yuan Liu0Ralph Gonzales1 School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USABackground: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a university-based cardiology practice and identified independent predictors of follow-up visits. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of new patient visits using electronic medical record data. The primary outcome was a follow-up visit. Results: Substantial variation in practice patterns by provider persisted after accounting for patient and disease factors. Most follow-up care was concentrated in a small population of patients. Conclusion: Specialty care follow-up visits may represent a significant opportunity for standardization and quality improvement, and further studies are warranted to understand follow-up visits in specialty care. Implications: Better understanding of between-provider differences could identify ways to reduce unnecessary follow-up visits. Level of Evidence: Single-institution study.https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Caterina Yuan Liu Ralph Gonzales |
spellingShingle |
Caterina Yuan Liu Ralph Gonzales Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology |
author_facet |
Caterina Yuan Liu Ralph Gonzales |
author_sort |
Caterina Yuan Liu |
title |
Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions |
title_short |
Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions |
title_full |
Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions |
title_fullStr |
Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions |
title_sort |
variation in follow-up visit practices across clinicians and conditions |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology |
issn |
2333-3928 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Background: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a university-based cardiology practice and identified independent predictors of follow-up visits. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of new patient visits using electronic medical record data. The primary outcome was a follow-up visit. Results: Substantial variation in practice patterns by provider persisted after accounting for patient and disease factors. Most follow-up care was concentrated in a small population of patients. Conclusion: Specialty care follow-up visits may represent a significant opportunity for standardization and quality improvement, and further studies are warranted to understand follow-up visits in specialty care. Implications: Better understanding of between-provider differences could identify ways to reduce unnecessary follow-up visits. Level of Evidence: Single-institution study. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT caterinayuanliu variationinfollowupvisitpracticesacrosscliniciansandconditions AT ralphgonzales variationinfollowupvisitpracticesacrosscliniciansandconditions |
_version_ |
1724517542661193728 |