Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions

Background: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caterina Yuan Liu, Ralph Gonzales
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-12-01
Series:Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185
id doaj-3d0b3a38d83a4becb06f7a5573d9f210
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d0b3a38d83a4becb06f7a5573d9f2102020-11-25T03:43:55ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology2333-39282015-12-01210.1177/233339281562018510.1177_2333392815620185Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and ConditionsCaterina Yuan Liu0Ralph Gonzales1 School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USABackground: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a university-based cardiology practice and identified independent predictors of follow-up visits. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of new patient visits using electronic medical record data. The primary outcome was a follow-up visit. Results: Substantial variation in practice patterns by provider persisted after accounting for patient and disease factors. Most follow-up care was concentrated in a small population of patients. Conclusion: Specialty care follow-up visits may represent a significant opportunity for standardization and quality improvement, and further studies are warranted to understand follow-up visits in specialty care. Implications: Better understanding of between-provider differences could identify ways to reduce unnecessary follow-up visits. Level of Evidence: Single-institution study.https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caterina Yuan Liu
Ralph Gonzales
spellingShingle Caterina Yuan Liu
Ralph Gonzales
Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology
author_facet Caterina Yuan Liu
Ralph Gonzales
author_sort Caterina Yuan Liu
title Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
title_short Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
title_full Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
title_fullStr Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions
title_sort variation in follow-up visit practices across clinicians and conditions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology
issn 2333-3928
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Background: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a university-based cardiology practice and identified independent predictors of follow-up visits. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of new patient visits using electronic medical record data. The primary outcome was a follow-up visit. Results: Substantial variation in practice patterns by provider persisted after accounting for patient and disease factors. Most follow-up care was concentrated in a small population of patients. Conclusion: Specialty care follow-up visits may represent a significant opportunity for standardization and quality improvement, and further studies are warranted to understand follow-up visits in specialty care. Implications: Better understanding of between-provider differences could identify ways to reduce unnecessary follow-up visits. Level of Evidence: Single-institution study.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185
work_keys_str_mv AT caterinayuanliu variationinfollowupvisitpracticesacrosscliniciansandconditions
AT ralphgonzales variationinfollowupvisitpracticesacrosscliniciansandconditions
_version_ 1724517542661193728