Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall

In the present study static response of cantilever retaining walls have been investigated by consideration of various soil constitutive models by means of finite element method with using PLAXIS 2-D software. Simulations have been performed at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters retaining walls with consi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Navid Hasanpouri Notash, Arash Havvaei, Rouzbeh Dabiri
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Papyrus Press 2018-02-01
Series:رویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jnace.ir/article_63076_e20e7571d62d2656a79428cffe0f38bc.pdf
id doaj-3d0966ebd45f4389820f32480e0618c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d0966ebd45f4389820f32480e0618c02020-11-25T01:43:59ZfasPapyrus Pressرویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران2588-68862588-71222018-02-011211310.30469/jnace.2018.6307663076Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining WallNavid Hasanpouri Notash0Arash Havvaei1Rouzbeh Dabiri2Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz,Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IranPh.D. of Geotechnical Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.In the present study static response of cantilever retaining walls have been investigated by consideration of various soil constitutive models by means of finite element method with using PLAXIS 2-D software. Simulations have been performed at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters retaining walls with considering two types of soils (cohesive and cohesionless) as backfill material. In this study, analysis have been conducted for two kinds of cohesionless backfill (loose and dense sand in dry condition) and at both conditions, saturated and unsaturated, for cohesive backfill. Analysis have been carried out by using three constitutive behavioral methods: Mohr-Coulomb (MC), Hardening-Soil (HS) and Hardening soil model with Small-Strain stiffness (HSS) for cohesionless backfill and additional method, Soft Soil model (SS), for cohesive backfill. The results show that, for cohesionless and cohesive backfill materials the lateral forces acting on the retaining wall are underestimated by the MC and SS constitutive models, respectively.http://www.jnace.ir/article_63076_e20e7571d62d2656a79428cffe0f38bc.pdfNumerical modelingCantilever Retaining WallSoil Constitutive Model
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Navid Hasanpouri Notash
Arash Havvaei
Rouzbeh Dabiri
spellingShingle Navid Hasanpouri Notash
Arash Havvaei
Rouzbeh Dabiri
Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
رویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران
Numerical modeling
Cantilever Retaining Wall
Soil Constitutive Model
author_facet Navid Hasanpouri Notash
Arash Havvaei
Rouzbeh Dabiri
author_sort Navid Hasanpouri Notash
title Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
title_short Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
title_full Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
title_fullStr Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
title_sort effect of soil constitutive models on numerical modeling of cantilever retaining wall
publisher Papyrus Press
series رویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران
issn 2588-6886
2588-7122
publishDate 2018-02-01
description In the present study static response of cantilever retaining walls have been investigated by consideration of various soil constitutive models by means of finite element method with using PLAXIS 2-D software. Simulations have been performed at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters retaining walls with considering two types of soils (cohesive and cohesionless) as backfill material. In this study, analysis have been conducted for two kinds of cohesionless backfill (loose and dense sand in dry condition) and at both conditions, saturated and unsaturated, for cohesive backfill. Analysis have been carried out by using three constitutive behavioral methods: Mohr-Coulomb (MC), Hardening-Soil (HS) and Hardening soil model with Small-Strain stiffness (HSS) for cohesionless backfill and additional method, Soft Soil model (SS), for cohesive backfill. The results show that, for cohesionless and cohesive backfill materials the lateral forces acting on the retaining wall are underestimated by the MC and SS constitutive models, respectively.
topic Numerical modeling
Cantilever Retaining Wall
Soil Constitutive Model
url http://www.jnace.ir/article_63076_e20e7571d62d2656a79428cffe0f38bc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT navidhasanpourinotash effectofsoilconstitutivemodelsonnumericalmodelingofcantileverretainingwall
AT arashhavvaei effectofsoilconstitutivemodelsonnumericalmodelingofcantileverretainingwall
AT rouzbehdabiri effectofsoilconstitutivemodelsonnumericalmodelingofcantileverretainingwall
_version_ 1725030383779577856