Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall
In the present study static response of cantilever retaining walls have been investigated by consideration of various soil constitutive models by means of finite element method with using PLAXIS 2-D software. Simulations have been performed at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters retaining walls with consi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Papyrus Press
2018-02-01
|
Series: | رویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jnace.ir/article_63076_e20e7571d62d2656a79428cffe0f38bc.pdf |
id |
doaj-3d0966ebd45f4389820f32480e0618c0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3d0966ebd45f4389820f32480e0618c02020-11-25T01:43:59ZfasPapyrus Pressرویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران2588-68862588-71222018-02-011211310.30469/jnace.2018.6307663076Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining WallNavid Hasanpouri Notash0Arash Havvaei1Rouzbeh Dabiri2Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz,Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IranPh.D. of Geotechnical Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.In the present study static response of cantilever retaining walls have been investigated by consideration of various soil constitutive models by means of finite element method with using PLAXIS 2-D software. Simulations have been performed at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters retaining walls with considering two types of soils (cohesive and cohesionless) as backfill material. In this study, analysis have been conducted for two kinds of cohesionless backfill (loose and dense sand in dry condition) and at both conditions, saturated and unsaturated, for cohesive backfill. Analysis have been carried out by using three constitutive behavioral methods: Mohr-Coulomb (MC), Hardening-Soil (HS) and Hardening soil model with Small-Strain stiffness (HSS) for cohesionless backfill and additional method, Soft Soil model (SS), for cohesive backfill. The results show that, for cohesionless and cohesive backfill materials the lateral forces acting on the retaining wall are underestimated by the MC and SS constitutive models, respectively.http://www.jnace.ir/article_63076_e20e7571d62d2656a79428cffe0f38bc.pdfNumerical modelingCantilever Retaining WallSoil Constitutive Model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Navid Hasanpouri Notash Arash Havvaei Rouzbeh Dabiri |
spellingShingle |
Navid Hasanpouri Notash Arash Havvaei Rouzbeh Dabiri Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall رویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران Numerical modeling Cantilever Retaining Wall Soil Constitutive Model |
author_facet |
Navid Hasanpouri Notash Arash Havvaei Rouzbeh Dabiri |
author_sort |
Navid Hasanpouri Notash |
title |
Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall |
title_short |
Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall |
title_full |
Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall |
title_fullStr |
Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of Soil Constitutive Models on Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall |
title_sort |
effect of soil constitutive models on numerical modeling of cantilever retaining wall |
publisher |
Papyrus Press |
series |
رویکردهای نوین در مهندسی عمران |
issn |
2588-6886 2588-7122 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
In the present study static response of cantilever retaining walls have been investigated by consideration of various soil constitutive models by means of finite element method with using PLAXIS 2-D software. Simulations have been performed at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters retaining walls with considering two types of soils (cohesive and cohesionless) as backfill material. In this study, analysis have been conducted for two kinds of cohesionless backfill (loose and dense sand in dry condition) and at both conditions, saturated and unsaturated, for cohesive backfill. Analysis have been carried out by using three constitutive behavioral methods: Mohr-Coulomb (MC), Hardening-Soil (HS) and Hardening soil model with Small-Strain stiffness (HSS) for cohesionless backfill and additional method, Soft Soil model (SS), for cohesive backfill. The results show that, for cohesionless and cohesive backfill materials the lateral forces acting on the retaining wall are underestimated by the MC and SS constitutive models, respectively. |
topic |
Numerical modeling Cantilever Retaining Wall Soil Constitutive Model |
url |
http://www.jnace.ir/article_63076_e20e7571d62d2656a79428cffe0f38bc.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT navidhasanpourinotash effectofsoilconstitutivemodelsonnumericalmodelingofcantileverretainingwall AT arashhavvaei effectofsoilconstitutivemodelsonnumericalmodelingofcantileverretainingwall AT rouzbehdabiri effectofsoilconstitutivemodelsonnumericalmodelingofcantileverretainingwall |
_version_ |
1725030383779577856 |