The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error

A tomography of neural sources could be constructed from EEG/MEG recordings once the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem (NIP) is solved. Unfortunately the NIP lacks a unique solution and therefore additional constraints are needed to achieve uniqueness. Researchers are then confronted with the dil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rolando Grave de Peralta, Olaf Hauk, Sara L. Gonzalez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2009-01-01
Series:Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/659247
id doaj-3d05ecfedab345b9adf37d2859de12b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3d05ecfedab345b9adf37d2859de12b82020-11-25T01:36:43ZengHindawi LimitedComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience1687-52651687-52732009-01-01200910.1155/2009/659247659247The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization ErrorRolando Grave de Peralta0Olaf Hauk1Sara L. Gonzalez2Electrical Neuroimaging Group, Neurology Department, Geneva University Hospital, 24 Rue Micheli du Crest, 1211 Geneva 14, SwitzerlandCognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UKElectrical Neuroimaging Group, Neurology Department, Geneva University Hospital, 24 Rue Micheli du Crest, 1211 Geneva 14, SwitzerlandA tomography of neural sources could be constructed from EEG/MEG recordings once the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem (NIP) is solved. Unfortunately the NIP lacks a unique solution and therefore additional constraints are needed to achieve uniqueness. Researchers are then confronted with the dilemma of choosing one solution on the basis of the advantages publicized by their authors. This study aims to help researchers to better guide their choices by clarifying what is hidden behind inverse solutions oversold by their apparently optimal properties to localize single sources. Here, we introduce an inverse solution (ANA) attaining perfect localization of single sources to illustrate how spurious sources emerge and destroy the reconstruction of simultaneously active sources. Although ANA is probably the simplest and robust alternative for data generated by a single dominant source plus noise, the main contribution of this manuscript is to show that zero localization error of single sources is a trivial and largely uninformative property unable to predict the performance of an inverse solution in presence of simultaneously active sources. We recommend as the most logical strategy for solving the NIP the incorporation of sound additional a priori information about neural generators that supplements the information contained in the data.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/659247
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rolando Grave de Peralta
Olaf Hauk
Sara L. Gonzalez
spellingShingle Rolando Grave de Peralta
Olaf Hauk
Sara L. Gonzalez
The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
author_facet Rolando Grave de Peralta
Olaf Hauk
Sara L. Gonzalez
author_sort Rolando Grave de Peralta
title The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error
title_short The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error
title_full The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error
title_fullStr The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error
title_full_unstemmed The Neuroelectromagnetic Inverse Problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error
title_sort neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem and the zero dipole localization error
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
issn 1687-5265
1687-5273
publishDate 2009-01-01
description A tomography of neural sources could be constructed from EEG/MEG recordings once the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem (NIP) is solved. Unfortunately the NIP lacks a unique solution and therefore additional constraints are needed to achieve uniqueness. Researchers are then confronted with the dilemma of choosing one solution on the basis of the advantages publicized by their authors. This study aims to help researchers to better guide their choices by clarifying what is hidden behind inverse solutions oversold by their apparently optimal properties to localize single sources. Here, we introduce an inverse solution (ANA) attaining perfect localization of single sources to illustrate how spurious sources emerge and destroy the reconstruction of simultaneously active sources. Although ANA is probably the simplest and robust alternative for data generated by a single dominant source plus noise, the main contribution of this manuscript is to show that zero localization error of single sources is a trivial and largely uninformative property unable to predict the performance of an inverse solution in presence of simultaneously active sources. We recommend as the most logical strategy for solving the NIP the incorporation of sound additional a priori information about neural generators that supplements the information contained in the data.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/659247
work_keys_str_mv AT rolandogravedeperalta theneuroelectromagneticinverseproblemandthezerodipolelocalizationerror
AT olafhauk theneuroelectromagneticinverseproblemandthezerodipolelocalizationerror
AT saralgonzalez theneuroelectromagneticinverseproblemandthezerodipolelocalizationerror
AT rolandogravedeperalta neuroelectromagneticinverseproblemandthezerodipolelocalizationerror
AT olafhauk neuroelectromagneticinverseproblemandthezerodipolelocalizationerror
AT saralgonzalez neuroelectromagneticinverseproblemandthezerodipolelocalizationerror
_version_ 1725061354250829824