Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices

In this work we propose an explanation (the Decreased Activation Hypothesis) for some prima facie conflicting findings concerning the choice/interpretation of subject anaphoric devices in late bilinguals (LBs). While some studies report an overuse of overt pronouns (often claimed to be a default for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elisa Di Domenico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2021-09-01
Series:Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-qulso/article/view/12002
id doaj-3cf9e4058e8541c08a120427d1e69e8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cf9e4058e8541c08a120427d1e69e8b2021-09-16T13:18:27ZengFirenze University PressQuaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali2421-72202021-09-01710.13128/qulso-2421-7220-12002Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devicesElisa Di DomenicoIn this work we propose an explanation (the Decreased Activation Hypothesis) for some prima facie conflicting findings concerning the choice/interpretation of subject anaphoric devices in late bilinguals (LBs). While some studies report an overuse of overt pronouns (often claimed to be a default form employed by LBs), other studies report an overuse of lexical DPs (interpreted as a sign of LBs’ over-explicitness). Our proposal is that over-explicitness in bilinguals is just outward and the use of seemingly over-explicit forms (overt pronouns or lexical DPs) stems from LBs difficulty to cope with referents’ activation. Then, starting from the observation that whenever overuse of overt pronouns is reported a null subject language is at least involved, and whenever overuse of lexical DPs is reported a non-null subject language is at least involved, we explore the way in which subject anaphoric devices are employed in (some) null subject languages and in (some) non-null subject languages, finally arguing that LBs of a null and a non-null subject language may choose to be seemingly overexplicit in two different ways. https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-qulso/article/view/12002AccessibilityBilingualismOver-ExplicitnessSubject Anaphoric Devices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elisa Di Domenico
spellingShingle Elisa Di Domenico
Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali
Accessibility
Bilingualism
Over-Explicitness
Subject Anaphoric Devices
author_facet Elisa Di Domenico
author_sort Elisa Di Domenico
title Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
title_short Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
title_full Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
title_fullStr Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
title_full_unstemmed Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
title_sort bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
publisher Firenze University Press
series Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali
issn 2421-7220
publishDate 2021-09-01
description In this work we propose an explanation (the Decreased Activation Hypothesis) for some prima facie conflicting findings concerning the choice/interpretation of subject anaphoric devices in late bilinguals (LBs). While some studies report an overuse of overt pronouns (often claimed to be a default form employed by LBs), other studies report an overuse of lexical DPs (interpreted as a sign of LBs’ over-explicitness). Our proposal is that over-explicitness in bilinguals is just outward and the use of seemingly over-explicit forms (overt pronouns or lexical DPs) stems from LBs difficulty to cope with referents’ activation. Then, starting from the observation that whenever overuse of overt pronouns is reported a null subject language is at least involved, and whenever overuse of lexical DPs is reported a non-null subject language is at least involved, we explore the way in which subject anaphoric devices are employed in (some) null subject languages and in (some) non-null subject languages, finally arguing that LBs of a null and a non-null subject language may choose to be seemingly overexplicit in two different ways.
topic Accessibility
Bilingualism
Over-Explicitness
Subject Anaphoric Devices
url https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-qulso/article/view/12002
work_keys_str_mv AT elisadidomenico bilingualismandoutwardoverexplicitnessinthechoiceofsubjectanaphoricdevices
_version_ 1717378217535340544