Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices
In this work we propose an explanation (the Decreased Activation Hypothesis) for some prima facie conflicting findings concerning the choice/interpretation of subject anaphoric devices in late bilinguals (LBs). While some studies report an overuse of overt pronouns (often claimed to be a default for...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Firenze University Press
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-qulso/article/view/12002 |
id |
doaj-3cf9e4058e8541c08a120427d1e69e8b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3cf9e4058e8541c08a120427d1e69e8b2021-09-16T13:18:27ZengFirenze University PressQuaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali2421-72202021-09-01710.13128/qulso-2421-7220-12002Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devicesElisa Di DomenicoIn this work we propose an explanation (the Decreased Activation Hypothesis) for some prima facie conflicting findings concerning the choice/interpretation of subject anaphoric devices in late bilinguals (LBs). While some studies report an overuse of overt pronouns (often claimed to be a default form employed by LBs), other studies report an overuse of lexical DPs (interpreted as a sign of LBs’ over-explicitness). Our proposal is that over-explicitness in bilinguals is just outward and the use of seemingly over-explicit forms (overt pronouns or lexical DPs) stems from LBs difficulty to cope with referents’ activation. Then, starting from the observation that whenever overuse of overt pronouns is reported a null subject language is at least involved, and whenever overuse of lexical DPs is reported a non-null subject language is at least involved, we explore the way in which subject anaphoric devices are employed in (some) null subject languages and in (some) non-null subject languages, finally arguing that LBs of a null and a non-null subject language may choose to be seemingly overexplicit in two different ways. https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-qulso/article/view/12002AccessibilityBilingualismOver-ExplicitnessSubject Anaphoric Devices |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elisa Di Domenico |
spellingShingle |
Elisa Di Domenico Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali Accessibility Bilingualism Over-Explicitness Subject Anaphoric Devices |
author_facet |
Elisa Di Domenico |
author_sort |
Elisa Di Domenico |
title |
Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices |
title_short |
Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices |
title_full |
Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices |
title_fullStr |
Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices |
title_sort |
bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices |
publisher |
Firenze University Press |
series |
Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali |
issn |
2421-7220 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
In this work we propose an explanation (the Decreased Activation Hypothesis) for some prima facie conflicting findings concerning the choice/interpretation of subject anaphoric devices in late bilinguals (LBs). While some studies report an overuse of overt pronouns (often claimed to be a default form employed by LBs), other studies report an overuse of lexical DPs (interpreted as a sign of LBs’ over-explicitness). Our proposal is that over-explicitness in bilinguals is just outward and the use of seemingly over-explicit forms (overt pronouns or lexical DPs) stems from LBs difficulty to cope with referents’ activation. Then, starting from the observation that whenever overuse of overt pronouns is reported a null subject language is at least involved, and whenever overuse of lexical DPs is reported a non-null subject language is at least involved, we explore the way in which subject anaphoric devices are employed in (some) null subject languages and in (some) non-null subject languages, finally arguing that LBs of a null and a non-null subject language may choose to be seemingly overexplicit in two different ways.
|
topic |
Accessibility Bilingualism Over-Explicitness Subject Anaphoric Devices |
url |
https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-qulso/article/view/12002 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elisadidomenico bilingualismandoutwardoverexplicitnessinthechoiceofsubjectanaphoricdevices |
_version_ |
1717378217535340544 |