Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery

Background: As a kidney transplant recipient I have long been exposed to a shortage of renal narratives and to a dominant theme in those that exist: transplant as restitution or redemption. My lived experience has, however, shown me that post-transplant life is more complex. Even after transplantati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rose Richards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-05-01
Series:African Journal of Disability
Online Access:https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/151
id doaj-3cf209cb79a0432da4a08173a734eabb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cf209cb79a0432da4a08173a734eabb2020-11-25T01:57:55ZengAOSISAfrican Journal of Disability2223-91702226-72202015-05-0141e1e1010.4102/ajod.v4i1.15153Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recoveryRose Richards0Research and Writing Laboratory, Language Centre, Stellenbosch University, South Africa; Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, South AfricaBackground: As a kidney transplant recipient I have long been exposed to a shortage of renal narratives and to a dominant theme in those that exist: transplant as restitution or redemption. My lived experience has, however, shown me that post-transplant life is more complex. Even after transplantation, chronic kidney disease requires lifelong health care with varying degrees of impairment, resulting in ongoing liminality for those who experience it. Nonetheless, as a transplant recipient I find the restitution or redemptive narrative pervasive and difficult to escape. Objective: I examined two seemingly very dissimilar insider renal biographies, Janet Hermans’s Perfect match: A kidney transplant reveals the ultimate second chance, and Steven Cojocaru’s Glamour, interrupted: How I became the best-dressed patient in Hollywood, to explore how the narrators treat chronic kidney disease and transplantation. Methods: In addition to a close textual reading of the biographies, I used my own experience of meaning-making to problematize concepts around restitution or redemptive narratives. Results: I found that the two biographies are, despite appearances and despite the attempts of one author to escape the redemptive form, very much the same type of narrative. The accounts end with the transplant, as is common, but the recipients’ lives continue after this, as they learn to live with their transplants, and this is not addressed. Conclusions: Emphasising restitution or redemption might prevent an understanding of post-transplant liminality that has unique characteristics. The narrator evading this narrative form must come to terms with a changed identity and, sometimes, fight to evade the pervasive narratives others impose.https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/151
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rose Richards
spellingShingle Rose Richards
Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
African Journal of Disability
author_facet Rose Richards
author_sort Rose Richards
title Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
title_short Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
title_full Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
title_fullStr Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
title_full_unstemmed Celebrities and spiritual gurus: Comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
title_sort celebrities and spiritual gurus: comparing two biographical accounts of kidney transplantation and recovery
publisher AOSIS
series African Journal of Disability
issn 2223-9170
2226-7220
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Background: As a kidney transplant recipient I have long been exposed to a shortage of renal narratives and to a dominant theme in those that exist: transplant as restitution or redemption. My lived experience has, however, shown me that post-transplant life is more complex. Even after transplantation, chronic kidney disease requires lifelong health care with varying degrees of impairment, resulting in ongoing liminality for those who experience it. Nonetheless, as a transplant recipient I find the restitution or redemptive narrative pervasive and difficult to escape. Objective: I examined two seemingly very dissimilar insider renal biographies, Janet Hermans’s Perfect match: A kidney transplant reveals the ultimate second chance, and Steven Cojocaru’s Glamour, interrupted: How I became the best-dressed patient in Hollywood, to explore how the narrators treat chronic kidney disease and transplantation. Methods: In addition to a close textual reading of the biographies, I used my own experience of meaning-making to problematize concepts around restitution or redemptive narratives. Results: I found that the two biographies are, despite appearances and despite the attempts of one author to escape the redemptive form, very much the same type of narrative. The accounts end with the transplant, as is common, but the recipients’ lives continue after this, as they learn to live with their transplants, and this is not addressed. Conclusions: Emphasising restitution or redemption might prevent an understanding of post-transplant liminality that has unique characteristics. The narrator evading this narrative form must come to terms with a changed identity and, sometimes, fight to evade the pervasive narratives others impose.
url https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/151
work_keys_str_mv AT roserichards celebritiesandspiritualguruscomparingtwobiographicalaccountsofkidneytransplantationandrecovery
_version_ 1724971769980256256