La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »

In Martha Nussbaum’s book Love’s Knowledge, literature is taken as a way to answer to the question “how must one live?” In our paper we question this idea that seems to us problematic on two sides. On one side, is literature really an “answer” to this question? Does Nussbaum highlight an answer to t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pierre Fasula
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Lille 2015-06-01
Series:Methodos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4177
id doaj-3cd9bb325d894386876bcd657219be36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cd9bb325d894386876bcd657219be362020-11-24T20:45:00ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792015-06-011510.4000/methodos.4177La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »Pierre FasulaIn Martha Nussbaum’s book Love’s Knowledge, literature is taken as a way to answer to the question “how must one live?” In our paper we question this idea that seems to us problematic on two sides. On one side, is literature really an “answer” to this question? Does Nussbaum highlight an answer to the question of good life, in her detailed analysis of novels? We find in the papers that make up Love’s Knowledge a tension between two ideas. Indeed Nussbaum seems to defend a life’s ideal where perception is the most important, in opposition with moral laws as well as a support for the application of moral laws. But she defends too the idea that every life’s ideal tends towards an inhuman ideal. Therefore literature provides not only ideals but also wisdom as regards to our relation to ideals: we must not transform them into inhuman ideals; we have particularly to accept an element of blindness in our life. On the other side, is literature an answer to a real “question”? It appears that the question of good life can’t be raised in the way it is in philosophy, but has to be rephrased under pressure of literature, that shows us the variety and complexity of life. It means that Nussbaum not only reminds us the ancient conflict between philosophy and literature, but also tries to go beyond it.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4177literaturephilosophyjust/good lifeidealmoral lawperception
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pierre Fasula
spellingShingle Pierre Fasula
La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »
Methodos
literature
philosophy
just/good life
ideal
moral law
perception
author_facet Pierre Fasula
author_sort Pierre Fasula
title La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »
title_short La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »
title_full La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »
title_fullStr La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »
title_full_unstemmed La littérature comme réponse à la question « Comment faut-il vivre ? »
title_sort la littérature comme réponse à la question « comment faut-il vivre ? »
publisher Université de Lille
series Methodos
issn 1769-7379
publishDate 2015-06-01
description In Martha Nussbaum’s book Love’s Knowledge, literature is taken as a way to answer to the question “how must one live?” In our paper we question this idea that seems to us problematic on two sides. On one side, is literature really an “answer” to this question? Does Nussbaum highlight an answer to the question of good life, in her detailed analysis of novels? We find in the papers that make up Love’s Knowledge a tension between two ideas. Indeed Nussbaum seems to defend a life’s ideal where perception is the most important, in opposition with moral laws as well as a support for the application of moral laws. But she defends too the idea that every life’s ideal tends towards an inhuman ideal. Therefore literature provides not only ideals but also wisdom as regards to our relation to ideals: we must not transform them into inhuman ideals; we have particularly to accept an element of blindness in our life. On the other side, is literature an answer to a real “question”? It appears that the question of good life can’t be raised in the way it is in philosophy, but has to be rephrased under pressure of literature, that shows us the variety and complexity of life. It means that Nussbaum not only reminds us the ancient conflict between philosophy and literature, but also tries to go beyond it.
topic literature
philosophy
just/good life
ideal
moral law
perception
url http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4177
work_keys_str_mv AT pierrefasula lalitteraturecommereponsealaquestioncommentfautilvivre
_version_ 1716815876020240384