Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?

<p class="p1">There is debate about whether results from mesocosm studies should be extrapolated to natural ecosystems. Critics argue that the <span style="font-size: 10px;">abiotic and biotic characteristics of mesocosms do not represent the </span><span cla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew R. Dzialowski, Marek Rzepecki, Iwona Kostrzewska-Szlakowska, Krystyna Kalinowska, Anna Palash, Jay T. Lennon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2014-05-01
Series:Journal of Limnology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/721
id doaj-3cd6a22582704972895f7285040a3b34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3cd6a22582704972895f7285040a3b342020-11-25T02:34:40ZengPAGEPress PublicationsJournal of Limnology1129-57671723-86332014-05-0173310.4081/jlimnol.2014.721659Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?Andrew R. Dzialowski0Marek Rzepecki1Iwona Kostrzewska-Szlakowska2Krystyna Kalinowska3Anna Palash4Jay T. Lennon5Oklahoma State UniversityPolish Academy of SciencesPolish Academy of SciencesHydrobiological Station of Polish Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences of BelarusIndiana University<p class="p1">There is debate about whether results from mesocosm studies should be extrapolated to natural ecosystems. Critics argue that the <span style="font-size: 10px;">abiotic and biotic characteristics of mesocosms do not represent the </span><span class="s1" style="font-size: 10px;">i<em>n situ </em></span><span style="font-size: 10px;">conditions of the habitats in which they are designed to </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">mimic. We addressed this idea by deploying mesocosms in two lakes of varying trophic status (mesotrophic and eutrophic). Water chemistry </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">was relatively similar between the mesocosms and the respective lakes. In contrast, biological variables including most phytoplankton, </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">nanoflagellates, ciliates, and zooplankton were lower in the mesocosms than they were in the respective lakes. There was </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">also a shift in zooplankton composition such that mesocosm assemblages diverged from pelagic to littoral communities. While our </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">results show that freshwater planktonic organisms can vary considerably between mesocosms and </span><span class="s1" style="font-size: 10px;">in situ </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">habitats, we also suggest that </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">factors such as isolation from lake sediments, the lack of predators, and the temporal scale at which mesocosms are filled and sampled </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">should be considered when designing and interpreting mesocosm studies. Nevertheless, mesocosms are an important tool for developing </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">and testing general ecological hypotheses that cannot be achieved using other approaches alone.</span></p>http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/721Mesocosmslimnocorralsperiphytonwall effect.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew R. Dzialowski
Marek Rzepecki
Iwona Kostrzewska-Szlakowska
Krystyna Kalinowska
Anna Palash
Jay T. Lennon
spellingShingle Andrew R. Dzialowski
Marek Rzepecki
Iwona Kostrzewska-Szlakowska
Krystyna Kalinowska
Anna Palash
Jay T. Lennon
Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
Journal of Limnology
Mesocosms
limnocorrals
periphyton
wall effect.
author_facet Andrew R. Dzialowski
Marek Rzepecki
Iwona Kostrzewska-Szlakowska
Krystyna Kalinowska
Anna Palash
Jay T. Lennon
author_sort Andrew R. Dzialowski
title Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
title_short Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
title_full Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
title_fullStr Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
title_full_unstemmed Are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
title_sort are the abiotic and biotic characteristics of aquatic mesocosms representative of in situ conditions?
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Journal of Limnology
issn 1129-5767
1723-8633
publishDate 2014-05-01
description <p class="p1">There is debate about whether results from mesocosm studies should be extrapolated to natural ecosystems. Critics argue that the <span style="font-size: 10px;">abiotic and biotic characteristics of mesocosms do not represent the </span><span class="s1" style="font-size: 10px;">i<em>n situ </em></span><span style="font-size: 10px;">conditions of the habitats in which they are designed to </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">mimic. We addressed this idea by deploying mesocosms in two lakes of varying trophic status (mesotrophic and eutrophic). Water chemistry </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">was relatively similar between the mesocosms and the respective lakes. In contrast, biological variables including most phytoplankton, </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">nanoflagellates, ciliates, and zooplankton were lower in the mesocosms than they were in the respective lakes. There was </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">also a shift in zooplankton composition such that mesocosm assemblages diverged from pelagic to littoral communities. While our </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">results show that freshwater planktonic organisms can vary considerably between mesocosms and </span><span class="s1" style="font-size: 10px;">in situ </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">habitats, we also suggest that </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">factors such as isolation from lake sediments, the lack of predators, and the temporal scale at which mesocosms are filled and sampled </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">should be considered when designing and interpreting mesocosm studies. Nevertheless, mesocosms are an important tool for developing </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">and testing general ecological hypotheses that cannot be achieved using other approaches alone.</span></p>
topic Mesocosms
limnocorrals
periphyton
wall effect.
url http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/721
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewrdzialowski aretheabioticandbioticcharacteristicsofaquaticmesocosmsrepresentativeofinsituconditions
AT marekrzepecki aretheabioticandbioticcharacteristicsofaquaticmesocosmsrepresentativeofinsituconditions
AT iwonakostrzewskaszlakowska aretheabioticandbioticcharacteristicsofaquaticmesocosmsrepresentativeofinsituconditions
AT krystynakalinowska aretheabioticandbioticcharacteristicsofaquaticmesocosmsrepresentativeofinsituconditions
AT annapalash aretheabioticandbioticcharacteristicsofaquaticmesocosmsrepresentativeofinsituconditions
AT jaytlennon aretheabioticandbioticcharacteristicsofaquaticmesocosmsrepresentativeofinsituconditions
_version_ 1724807394652848128