The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems.
Alternative forages can be used to provide valuable home-grown feed for ruminant livestock. Utilising these different forages could affect the manure value and the implications of incorporating these forages into farming systems, needs to be better understood. An experiment tested the hypothesis tha...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4022616?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-3cbcd6f86f0c4fd29c62ae28dd6c91e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3cbcd6f86f0c4fd29c62ae28dd6c91e22020-11-25T01:51:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9751610.1371/journal.pone.0097516The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems.Felicity V CrottyRhun FychanVince J TheobaldRuth SandersonDavid R ChadwickChristina L MarleyAlternative forages can be used to provide valuable home-grown feed for ruminant livestock. Utilising these different forages could affect the manure value and the implications of incorporating these forages into farming systems, needs to be better understood. An experiment tested the hypothesis that applying slurries from ruminants, fed ensiled red clover (Trifolium pratense), lucerne (Medicago sativa) or kale (Brassica oleracea) would improve the yield of hybrid ryegrass (Lolium hybridicum), compared with applying slurries from ruminants fed ensiled hybrid ryegrass, or applying inorganic N alone. Slurries from sheep offered one of four silages were applied to ryegrass plots (at 35 t ha⁻¹) with 100 kg N ha⁻¹ inorganic fertiliser; dry matter (DM) yield was compared to plots only receiving ammonium nitrate at rates of 0, 100 and 250 kg N ha⁻¹ year-1. The DM yield of plots treated with 250 kg N, lucerne or red clover slurry was significantly higher than other treatments (P<0.001). The estimated relative fertiliser N equivalence (FNE) (fertiliser-N needed to produce same yield as slurry N), was greatest for lucerne (114 kg) >red clover (81 kg) >kale (44 kg) >ryegrass (26 kg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹). These FNE values represent relative efficiencies of 22% (ryegrass), 52% (kale), 47% (red clover) and 60% for lucerne slurry, with the ryegrass slurry efficiency being lowest (P = 0.005). Soil magnesium levels in plots treated with legume slurry were higher than other treatments (P<0.001). Overall, slurries from ruminants fed alternative ensiled forages increased soil nutrient status, forage productivity and better N efficiency than slurries from ruminants fed ryegrass silage. The efficiency of fertiliser use is one of the major factors influencing the sustainability of farming systems, these findings highlight the cascade in benefits from feeding ruminants alternative forages, and the need to ensure their value is effectively captured to reduce environmental risks.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4022616?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Felicity V Crotty Rhun Fychan Vince J Theobald Ruth Sanderson David R Chadwick Christina L Marley |
spellingShingle |
Felicity V Crotty Rhun Fychan Vince J Theobald Ruth Sanderson David R Chadwick Christina L Marley The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Felicity V Crotty Rhun Fychan Vince J Theobald Ruth Sanderson David R Chadwick Christina L Marley |
author_sort |
Felicity V Crotty |
title |
The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. |
title_short |
The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. |
title_full |
The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. |
title_fullStr |
The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. |
title_sort |
impact of using alternative forages on the nutrient value within slurry and its implications for forage productivity in agricultural systems. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Alternative forages can be used to provide valuable home-grown feed for ruminant livestock. Utilising these different forages could affect the manure value and the implications of incorporating these forages into farming systems, needs to be better understood. An experiment tested the hypothesis that applying slurries from ruminants, fed ensiled red clover (Trifolium pratense), lucerne (Medicago sativa) or kale (Brassica oleracea) would improve the yield of hybrid ryegrass (Lolium hybridicum), compared with applying slurries from ruminants fed ensiled hybrid ryegrass, or applying inorganic N alone. Slurries from sheep offered one of four silages were applied to ryegrass plots (at 35 t ha⁻¹) with 100 kg N ha⁻¹ inorganic fertiliser; dry matter (DM) yield was compared to plots only receiving ammonium nitrate at rates of 0, 100 and 250 kg N ha⁻¹ year-1. The DM yield of plots treated with 250 kg N, lucerne or red clover slurry was significantly higher than other treatments (P<0.001). The estimated relative fertiliser N equivalence (FNE) (fertiliser-N needed to produce same yield as slurry N), was greatest for lucerne (114 kg) >red clover (81 kg) >kale (44 kg) >ryegrass (26 kg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹). These FNE values represent relative efficiencies of 22% (ryegrass), 52% (kale), 47% (red clover) and 60% for lucerne slurry, with the ryegrass slurry efficiency being lowest (P = 0.005). Soil magnesium levels in plots treated with legume slurry were higher than other treatments (P<0.001). Overall, slurries from ruminants fed alternative ensiled forages increased soil nutrient status, forage productivity and better N efficiency than slurries from ruminants fed ryegrass silage. The efficiency of fertiliser use is one of the major factors influencing the sustainability of farming systems, these findings highlight the cascade in benefits from feeding ruminants alternative forages, and the need to ensure their value is effectively captured to reduce environmental risks. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4022616?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT felicityvcrotty theimpactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT rhunfychan theimpactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT vincejtheobald theimpactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT ruthsanderson theimpactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT davidrchadwick theimpactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT christinalmarley theimpactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT felicityvcrotty impactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT rhunfychan impactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT vincejtheobald impactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT ruthsanderson impactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT davidrchadwick impactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems AT christinalmarley impactofusingalternativeforagesonthenutrientvaluewithinslurryanditsimplicationsforforageproductivityinagriculturalsystems |
_version_ |
1724996477811425280 |