Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>North American <it>Agalinis </it>Raf. species represent a taxonomically challenging group and there have been extensive historical revisions at the species, section, and subsection levels of classification. The genus cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neel Maile C, Pettengill James B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-09-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/264
id doaj-3ca684bf432a4ff7943fd4fc19bae832
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ca684bf432a4ff7943fd4fc19bae8322021-09-02T08:07:50ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482008-09-018126410.1186/1471-2148-8-264Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)Neel Maile CPettengill James B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>North American <it>Agalinis </it>Raf. species represent a taxonomically challenging group and there have been extensive historical revisions at the species, section, and subsection levels of classification. The genus contains many rare species, including the federally listed endangered species <it>Agalinis acuta</it>. In addition to evaluating the degree to which historical classifications at the section and subsection levels are supported by molecular data sampled from 79 individuals representing 29 <it>Agalinis </it>species, we assessed the monophyly of 27 species by sampling multiple individuals representing different populations of those species. Twenty-one of these species are of conservation concern in at least some part of their range.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Phylogenetic relationships estimated using maximum likelihood analyses of seven chloroplast DNA loci (aligned length = 11 076 base pairs (bp) and the nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS (internal transcribed spacer) locus (733 bp); indicated no support for the historically recognized sections except for Section Erectae. Our results suggest that North American members of the genus comprise six major lineages, however we were not able to resolve branching order among many of these lineages. Monophyly of 24 of the 29 sampled species was supported based on significant branch lengths of and high bootstrap support for subtending branches. However, there was no statistical support for the monophyly of <it>A. acuta </it>with respect to <it>Agalinis tenella </it>and <it>Agalinis decemloba</it>. Although most species were supported, deeper relationships among many species remain ambiguous.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The North American <it>Agalinis </it>species sampled form a well supported, monophyletic group within the family Orobanchaceae relative to the outgroups sampled. Most hypotheses regarding section- and subsection-level relationships based on morphology were not supported and taxonomic revisions are warranted. Lack of support for monophyly of <it>Agalinis acuta </it>leaves the important question regarding its taxonomic status unanswered. Lack of resolution is potentially due to incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral polymorphisms among recently diverged species; however the gene regions examined did distinguish among almost all other species in the genus. Due to the important policy implications of this finding we are further evaluating the evolutionary distinctiveness of <it>A. acuta </it>using morphological data and loci with higher mutation rates.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/264
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neel Maile C
Pettengill James B
spellingShingle Neel Maile C
Pettengill James B
Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Neel Maile C
Pettengill James B
author_sort Neel Maile C
title Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)
title_short Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)
title_full Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)
title_fullStr Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic patterns and conservation among North American members of the genus <it>Agalinis </it>(Orobanchaceae)
title_sort phylogenetic patterns and conservation among north american members of the genus <it>agalinis </it>(orobanchaceae)
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2008-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>North American <it>Agalinis </it>Raf. species represent a taxonomically challenging group and there have been extensive historical revisions at the species, section, and subsection levels of classification. The genus contains many rare species, including the federally listed endangered species <it>Agalinis acuta</it>. In addition to evaluating the degree to which historical classifications at the section and subsection levels are supported by molecular data sampled from 79 individuals representing 29 <it>Agalinis </it>species, we assessed the monophyly of 27 species by sampling multiple individuals representing different populations of those species. Twenty-one of these species are of conservation concern in at least some part of their range.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Phylogenetic relationships estimated using maximum likelihood analyses of seven chloroplast DNA loci (aligned length = 11 076 base pairs (bp) and the nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS (internal transcribed spacer) locus (733 bp); indicated no support for the historically recognized sections except for Section Erectae. Our results suggest that North American members of the genus comprise six major lineages, however we were not able to resolve branching order among many of these lineages. Monophyly of 24 of the 29 sampled species was supported based on significant branch lengths of and high bootstrap support for subtending branches. However, there was no statistical support for the monophyly of <it>A. acuta </it>with respect to <it>Agalinis tenella </it>and <it>Agalinis decemloba</it>. Although most species were supported, deeper relationships among many species remain ambiguous.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The North American <it>Agalinis </it>species sampled form a well supported, monophyletic group within the family Orobanchaceae relative to the outgroups sampled. Most hypotheses regarding section- and subsection-level relationships based on morphology were not supported and taxonomic revisions are warranted. Lack of support for monophyly of <it>Agalinis acuta </it>leaves the important question regarding its taxonomic status unanswered. Lack of resolution is potentially due to incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral polymorphisms among recently diverged species; however the gene regions examined did distinguish among almost all other species in the genus. Due to the important policy implications of this finding we are further evaluating the evolutionary distinctiveness of <it>A. acuta </it>using morphological data and loci with higher mutation rates.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/264
work_keys_str_mv AT neelmailec phylogeneticpatternsandconservationamongnorthamericanmembersofthegenusitagalinisitorobanchaceae
AT pettengilljamesb phylogeneticpatternsandconservationamongnorthamericanmembersofthegenusitagalinisitorobanchaceae
_version_ 1721177953751007232