PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS

The importance of the use of activated charcoal tubes for sampling gases and vapors is very well-known. For producing these tubes in the country, their production started in the laboratory of the department of occupation al health using activated charcoal, polyurethane foam and glass wool and conseq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P.Nassiri, F. Golbabaie, S. Nasseri, M. Mahmoodi, K. Mehrain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 1988-08-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/1548.pdf&manuscript_id=1548
id doaj-3c976a716c884ba1a4bbe18a347add4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c976a716c884ba1a4bbe18a347add4f2020-12-02T01:03:22ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Public Health2251-60851988-08-01171-4918PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTSP.NassiriF. GolbabaieS. NasseriM. MahmoodiK. MehrainThe importance of the use of activated charcoal tubes for sampling gases and vapors is very well-known. For producing these tubes in the country, their production started in the laboratory of the department of occupation al health using activated charcoal, polyurethane foam and glass wool and consequently two types of foamed and foamless tubes were produced. To investigate the quality of the raw materials used, 186 tubes were exposed to various proportions of solutions of different volumes of known percentages of four compounds of benzene, toluene, O-xylene and P-xlene. The adsorption of various parts of sampler tubes was done by a chemical method using CS2 and the final analysis was done by gas chromatography. The results obtained show that the amount of the above named compounds adsorbed by glass wool and foam in comparison to the activated charcoal isn’t significant (respectively P<0.001 & P,0.05). Also the experiments don’s show any significant differences between the total amount of adsorbed chemicals by charcoal in the back-up layer and the sample layer of the foamed tube and the amount adsorbed in the foamless tube, when treated with various compounds (P,0.001). Considering the equal adsorption of both types of tubes and the advantage of foamed tubes in controlling the time duration and the flow rate of sampling, the foamed type was recommended for production and use.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/1548.pdf&manuscript_id=1548Polyurethane foamAir contaminates
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P.Nassiri
F. Golbabaie
S. Nasseri
M. Mahmoodi
K. Mehrain
spellingShingle P.Nassiri
F. Golbabaie
S. Nasseri
M. Mahmoodi
K. Mehrain
PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Polyurethane foam
Air contaminates
author_facet P.Nassiri
F. Golbabaie
S. Nasseri
M. Mahmoodi
K. Mehrain
author_sort P.Nassiri
title PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS
title_short PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS
title_full PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS
title_fullStr PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS
title_full_unstemmed PRODUCTION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL SAMPLER TUBES FOR SAMPLING AIR CONTAMINANTS
title_sort production of activated charcoal sampler tubes for sampling air contaminants
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Iranian Journal of Public Health
issn 2251-6085
publishDate 1988-08-01
description The importance of the use of activated charcoal tubes for sampling gases and vapors is very well-known. For producing these tubes in the country, their production started in the laboratory of the department of occupation al health using activated charcoal, polyurethane foam and glass wool and consequently two types of foamed and foamless tubes were produced. To investigate the quality of the raw materials used, 186 tubes were exposed to various proportions of solutions of different volumes of known percentages of four compounds of benzene, toluene, O-xylene and P-xlene. The adsorption of various parts of sampler tubes was done by a chemical method using CS2 and the final analysis was done by gas chromatography. The results obtained show that the amount of the above named compounds adsorbed by glass wool and foam in comparison to the activated charcoal isn’t significant (respectively P<0.001 & P,0.05). Also the experiments don’s show any significant differences between the total amount of adsorbed chemicals by charcoal in the back-up layer and the sample layer of the foamed tube and the amount adsorbed in the foamless tube, when treated with various compounds (P,0.001). Considering the equal adsorption of both types of tubes and the advantage of foamed tubes in controlling the time duration and the flow rate of sampling, the foamed type was recommended for production and use.
topic Polyurethane foam
Air contaminates
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/1548.pdf&manuscript_id=1548
work_keys_str_mv AT pnassiri productionofactivatedcharcoalsamplertubesforsamplingaircontaminants
AT fgolbabaie productionofactivatedcharcoalsamplertubesforsamplingaircontaminants
AT snasseri productionofactivatedcharcoalsamplertubesforsamplingaircontaminants
AT mmahmoodi productionofactivatedcharcoalsamplertubesforsamplingaircontaminants
AT kmehrain productionofactivatedcharcoalsamplertubesforsamplingaircontaminants
_version_ 1724410261167669248