Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.

The problem of how to protect sea turtle nests from terrestrial predators is of worldwide concern. On Queensland's southern Sunshine Coast, depredation of turtle nests by the introduced European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been recorded as the primary terrestrial cause of egg and hatchling mort...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie M O'Connor, Colin J Limpus, Kate M Hofmeister, Benjamin L Allen, Scott E Burnett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5302370?pdf=render
id doaj-3c96af62c92b472696dcbe3e6b2ec0ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c96af62c92b472696dcbe3e6b2ec0ef2020-11-25T00:08:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e017183110.1371/journal.pone.0171831Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.Julie M O'ConnorColin J LimpusKate M HofmeisterBenjamin L AllenScott E BurnettThe problem of how to protect sea turtle nests from terrestrial predators is of worldwide concern. On Queensland's southern Sunshine Coast, depredation of turtle nests by the introduced European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been recorded as the primary terrestrial cause of egg and hatchling mortality. We investigated the impact of foxes on the nests of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) and occasional green turtle (Chelonia mydas) over ten nesting seasons. Meshing of nests with fox exclusion devices (FEDs) was undertaken in all years accompanied by lethal fox control in the first five-year period, but not in the second five-year period. Lethal fox control was undertaken in the study area from 2005 to February 2010, but foxes still breached 27% (range19-52%) of turtle nests. In the second five-year period, despite the absence of lethal fox control, the average percentage of nests breached was less than 3% (range 0-4%). Comparison of clutch depredation rates in the two five-year periods demonstrated that continuous nest meshing may be more effective than lethal fox control in mitigating the impact of foxes on turtle nests. In the absence of unlimited resources available for the eradication of exotic predators, the use of FEDs and the support and resourcing of a dedicated volunteer base can be considered an effective turtle conservation tool on some beaches.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5302370?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julie M O'Connor
Colin J Limpus
Kate M Hofmeister
Benjamin L Allen
Scott E Burnett
spellingShingle Julie M O'Connor
Colin J Limpus
Kate M Hofmeister
Benjamin L Allen
Scott E Burnett
Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Julie M O'Connor
Colin J Limpus
Kate M Hofmeister
Benjamin L Allen
Scott E Burnett
author_sort Julie M O'Connor
title Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
title_short Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
title_full Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
title_fullStr Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
title_full_unstemmed Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
title_sort anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The problem of how to protect sea turtle nests from terrestrial predators is of worldwide concern. On Queensland's southern Sunshine Coast, depredation of turtle nests by the introduced European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been recorded as the primary terrestrial cause of egg and hatchling mortality. We investigated the impact of foxes on the nests of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) and occasional green turtle (Chelonia mydas) over ten nesting seasons. Meshing of nests with fox exclusion devices (FEDs) was undertaken in all years accompanied by lethal fox control in the first five-year period, but not in the second five-year period. Lethal fox control was undertaken in the study area from 2005 to February 2010, but foxes still breached 27% (range19-52%) of turtle nests. In the second five-year period, despite the absence of lethal fox control, the average percentage of nests breached was less than 3% (range 0-4%). Comparison of clutch depredation rates in the two five-year periods demonstrated that continuous nest meshing may be more effective than lethal fox control in mitigating the impact of foxes on turtle nests. In the absence of unlimited resources available for the eradication of exotic predators, the use of FEDs and the support and resourcing of a dedicated volunteer base can be considered an effective turtle conservation tool on some beaches.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5302370?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT juliemoconnor antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT colinjlimpus antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT katemhofmeister antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT benjaminlallen antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT scotteburnett antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
_version_ 1725415570658033664