Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples

Background:. Nipple inversion is a common pathologic condition affecting 2%–10% of women. Congenital inversions are the most common forms, while acquired inversions are less frequent. This condition can induce psychological discomfort, functional problems that could prevent adequate breast feeding,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Lucia Mangialardi, MD, Ilaria Baldelli, MD, PhD, Marzia Salgarello, MD, PhD, Edoardo Raposio, MD, PhD, FICS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-07-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002971
id doaj-3c93e6d04bc140ffa3d07603f2ca5244
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c93e6d04bc140ffa3d07603f2ca52442020-11-25T03:34:25ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742020-07-0187e297110.1097/GOX.0000000000002971202007000-00005Surgical Correction of Inverted NipplesMaria Lucia Mangialardi, MD0Ilaria Baldelli, MD, PhD1Marzia Salgarello, MD, PhD2Edoardo Raposio, MD, PhD, FICS3From the *Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy†Clinica di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino e Sezione di Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.From the *Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy†Clinica di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino e Sezione di Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.Background:. Nipple inversion is a common pathologic condition affecting 2%–10% of women. Congenital inversions are the most common forms, while acquired inversions are less frequent. This condition can induce psychological discomfort, functional problems that could prevent adequate breast feeding, and cosmetic dissatisfaction, and create local irritation and infection. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature about surgical treatment of inverted nipple. Methods:. A literature search was conducted by using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database using the following MeSH terms: “inverted nipple,” “inverted nipple surgery,” “inverted nipple treatment,” and “inverted nipple management.” Studies that described surgical treatment and included outcomes and recurrence rate were included. Results:. Thirty-three articles were considered suitable, including 3369 inverted nipple cases. Eight studies described techniques with lactiferous ducts damaging, while 25 studies described techniques with lactiferous duct preservation using dermal flaps, sutures, or distractor systems. The average follow-up was 23.9 months. Overall, a satisfactory correction was reached in 88.6% of cases, and the recurrence rate was 3.89%. Conclusions:. To our knowledge, our review includes the largest sample size in the literature. The heterogeneity and subjectivity of outcomes make it more complicated to state which is the best surgical strategy to adopt to obtain satisfactory and stable results with minimal morbidity. This study highlights the need of a standardized method to evaluate outcomes, including aesthetic, functional and psychological results, while using objective and subjective measurement instruments.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002971
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Lucia Mangialardi, MD
Ilaria Baldelli, MD, PhD
Marzia Salgarello, MD, PhD
Edoardo Raposio, MD, PhD, FICS
spellingShingle Maria Lucia Mangialardi, MD
Ilaria Baldelli, MD, PhD
Marzia Salgarello, MD, PhD
Edoardo Raposio, MD, PhD, FICS
Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Maria Lucia Mangialardi, MD
Ilaria Baldelli, MD, PhD
Marzia Salgarello, MD, PhD
Edoardo Raposio, MD, PhD, FICS
author_sort Maria Lucia Mangialardi, MD
title Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples
title_short Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples
title_full Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples
title_fullStr Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Correction of Inverted Nipples
title_sort surgical correction of inverted nipples
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Background:. Nipple inversion is a common pathologic condition affecting 2%–10% of women. Congenital inversions are the most common forms, while acquired inversions are less frequent. This condition can induce psychological discomfort, functional problems that could prevent adequate breast feeding, and cosmetic dissatisfaction, and create local irritation and infection. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature about surgical treatment of inverted nipple. Methods:. A literature search was conducted by using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database using the following MeSH terms: “inverted nipple,” “inverted nipple surgery,” “inverted nipple treatment,” and “inverted nipple management.” Studies that described surgical treatment and included outcomes and recurrence rate were included. Results:. Thirty-three articles were considered suitable, including 3369 inverted nipple cases. Eight studies described techniques with lactiferous ducts damaging, while 25 studies described techniques with lactiferous duct preservation using dermal flaps, sutures, or distractor systems. The average follow-up was 23.9 months. Overall, a satisfactory correction was reached in 88.6% of cases, and the recurrence rate was 3.89%. Conclusions:. To our knowledge, our review includes the largest sample size in the literature. The heterogeneity and subjectivity of outcomes make it more complicated to state which is the best surgical strategy to adopt to obtain satisfactory and stable results with minimal morbidity. This study highlights the need of a standardized method to evaluate outcomes, including aesthetic, functional and psychological results, while using objective and subjective measurement instruments.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002971
work_keys_str_mv AT marialuciamangialardimd surgicalcorrectionofinvertednipples
AT ilariabaldellimdphd surgicalcorrectionofinvertednipples
AT marziasalgarellomdphd surgicalcorrectionofinvertednipples
AT edoardoraposiomdphdfics surgicalcorrectionofinvertednipples
_version_ 1724558856169717760