L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles

Preserving water quality implies to call upon and share different knowledge. From the claim that actors on the field associate a diversity of knowledge, in this paper we analyse cases of water protection in two catchment areas, considered as “situations of expertise”. Our results lie in four key poi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandrine Petit, Fabienne Barataud
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions en environnement VertigO 2015-05-01
Series:VertigO
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/15938
id doaj-3c90e9c458f4482c853cc97bc464d426
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c90e9c458f4482c853cc97bc464d4262021-09-02T16:02:26ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422015-05-0115110.4000/vertigo.15938L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricolesSandrine PetitFabienne BarataudPreserving water quality implies to call upon and share different knowledge. From the claim that actors on the field associate a diversity of knowledge, in this paper we analyse cases of water protection in two catchment areas, considered as “situations of expertise”. Our results lie in four key points describing the relation between knowledge and management decisions and shedding light on the difficulties of finding situated and locally adapted solutions : (i) cognitive activity or knowledge production are not seen as a social and epistemic practice implying knowledge exchange, sharing and debate. Controversial situations are avoided to act fast ; (ii) knowledge coming from farmers and lay people experience is little used as a relevant causality model compared with other knowledge approaches (experimentation, computer modeling, GIS) ; (iii) the social knowledge about the situation is not included in the diagnosis even if social relations impact the actions implementation ; (iv) the management actions result from a reduction of possibilities funnelled through two filters : the first one, diagnosis characteristics (the expertise constitutes the action) which tend to promote an adaptation of practices rather than a change of agricultural production model ; the second filter is that of legitimacy (legitimate expertise), taken decisions are those admitted by the different social groups.http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/15938knowledgeexpertisewater qualitywater catchment areafarming
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandrine Petit
Fabienne Barataud
spellingShingle Sandrine Petit
Fabienne Barataud
L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
VertigO
knowledge
expertise
water quality
water catchment area
farming
author_facet Sandrine Petit
Fabienne Barataud
author_sort Sandrine Petit
title L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
title_short L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
title_full L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
title_fullStr L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
title_full_unstemmed L’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
title_sort l’eau, source de savoirs : analyse de situations d’expertise dans des bassins versants agricoles
publisher Éditions en environnement VertigO
series VertigO
issn 1492-8442
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Preserving water quality implies to call upon and share different knowledge. From the claim that actors on the field associate a diversity of knowledge, in this paper we analyse cases of water protection in two catchment areas, considered as “situations of expertise”. Our results lie in four key points describing the relation between knowledge and management decisions and shedding light on the difficulties of finding situated and locally adapted solutions : (i) cognitive activity or knowledge production are not seen as a social and epistemic practice implying knowledge exchange, sharing and debate. Controversial situations are avoided to act fast ; (ii) knowledge coming from farmers and lay people experience is little used as a relevant causality model compared with other knowledge approaches (experimentation, computer modeling, GIS) ; (iii) the social knowledge about the situation is not included in the diagnosis even if social relations impact the actions implementation ; (iv) the management actions result from a reduction of possibilities funnelled through two filters : the first one, diagnosis characteristics (the expertise constitutes the action) which tend to promote an adaptation of practices rather than a change of agricultural production model ; the second filter is that of legitimacy (legitimate expertise), taken decisions are those admitted by the different social groups.
topic knowledge
expertise
water quality
water catchment area
farming
url http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/15938
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrinepetit leausourcedesavoirsanalysedesituationsdexpertisedansdesbassinsversantsagricoles
AT fabiennebarataud leausourcedesavoirsanalysedesituationsdexpertisedansdesbassinsversantsagricoles
_version_ 1721173080250777600