The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies

The research is carried out from the perspective of urban communication studies and uses the analytical sociolinguistic framework, which provides an opportunity to reveal the role of different semiotic signs in creating the image of a big city as an existential space. The paper focuses on surveilla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olga A. Leontovich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Volgograd State University 2018-12-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1864
id doaj-3c7eae34238244babb67ff4f3d6010c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c7eae34238244babb67ff4f3d6010c12020-11-25T02:23:53ZengVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie1998-99112409-19792018-12-0117420621310.15688/jvolsu2.2018.4.20The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication StudiesOlga A. Leontovich0Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University; Tianjin Foreign Studies UniversityThe research is carried out from the perspective of urban communication studies and uses the analytical sociolinguistic framework, which provides an opportunity to reveal the role of different semiotic signs in creating the image of a big city as an existential space. The paper focuses on surveillance as a common communication practice and investigates the system of Russian semiotic signs surrounding a city dweller as an object of surveillance. Signs construct the communicative situation of surveillance, which includes a subject, object, place, time, aim of surveillance and the consequences of actions seen as forbidden or undesirable. An important place in the study belongs to the notion of social visibility, which acquires a new meaning in the context of the research. The subjects of surveillance are unidentified representatives of power, whereas its objects are common citizens. Semiotic signs reflect the asymmetry of the social relationship between them (the subject of surveillance is invisible, the object is visible; the state demonstrates the paternalistic attitude towards its citizens). The modality of the message reflects the type of relationship between the subject and the object of surveillance and its social dynamics. The findings indicate that semiotic signs connected with surveillance become a powerful means of social stratification and regulate social relations in Russian urban discourse.https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1864urban communicationsociolinguisticssemioticssocial visibilitysurveillance studies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olga A. Leontovich
spellingShingle Olga A. Leontovich
The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie
urban communication
sociolinguistics
semiotics
social visibility
surveillance studies
author_facet Olga A. Leontovich
author_sort Olga A. Leontovich
title The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies
title_short The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies
title_full The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies
title_fullStr The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies
title_full_unstemmed The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies
title_sort all-seeing eye of the city from the perspective of urban communication studies
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie
issn 1998-9911
2409-1979
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The research is carried out from the perspective of urban communication studies and uses the analytical sociolinguistic framework, which provides an opportunity to reveal the role of different semiotic signs in creating the image of a big city as an existential space. The paper focuses on surveillance as a common communication practice and investigates the system of Russian semiotic signs surrounding a city dweller as an object of surveillance. Signs construct the communicative situation of surveillance, which includes a subject, object, place, time, aim of surveillance and the consequences of actions seen as forbidden or undesirable. An important place in the study belongs to the notion of social visibility, which acquires a new meaning in the context of the research. The subjects of surveillance are unidentified representatives of power, whereas its objects are common citizens. Semiotic signs reflect the asymmetry of the social relationship between them (the subject of surveillance is invisible, the object is visible; the state demonstrates the paternalistic attitude towards its citizens). The modality of the message reflects the type of relationship between the subject and the object of surveillance and its social dynamics. The findings indicate that semiotic signs connected with surveillance become a powerful means of social stratification and regulate social relations in Russian urban discourse.
topic urban communication
sociolinguistics
semiotics
social visibility
surveillance studies
url https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1864
work_keys_str_mv AT olgaaleontovich theallseeingeyeofthecityfromtheperspectiveofurbancommunicationstudies
AT olgaaleontovich allseeingeyeofthecityfromtheperspectiveofurbancommunicationstudies
_version_ 1724856651406639104