Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction

Objective The identification of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) is important during the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to aerosol-mediated virus transmission. Aerosol measurement during clinical procedures using particle counting may be confounded by variable natural background aerosol levels...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Bahgat MSc, MRCS, Leon Lindsey FRCS, Paul Lindsey, Andrew Knight MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-07-01
Series:OTO Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X211027125
id doaj-3c7918cbd17f4e27bf76d2f15c58d6e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c7918cbd17f4e27bf76d2f15c58d6e22021-07-06T21:33:29ZengSAGE PublishingOTO Open2473-974X2021-07-01510.1177/2473974X211027125Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface SuctionMohammed Bahgat MSc, MRCS0Leon Lindsey FRCS1Paul Lindsey2Andrew Knight MSc3Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UKEar, Nose and Throat Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UKOphtalmology Department, Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UKDepartment of Medical Physics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UKObjective The identification of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) is important during the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to aerosol-mediated virus transmission. Aerosol measurement during clinical procedures using particle counting may be confounded by variable natural background aerosol levels or limited by partial volume sampling. The study objective was to quantify any significant aerosol generated from simulated suction clearance procedures. Study Design Prospective quantification of aerosol generation during clinical suction simulation. Setting Clean chamber. Methods We created a clean environment for particle counting in a transparent neutralized polypropylene chamber. Air was passed through a HEPA 14 class filter to maintain a constant chamber inlet pressure. An optical particle counter was connected in line to the chamber exhaust vent to measure all of the vented particles. The chamber background count was 1 particle ≥0.3 µm per 15 minutes at a flow rate of 1 chamber air change per minute. We used this system to quantify very low aerosol counts generated from suction clearance of a silicone ear canal and at an open air-fluid interface. Results No clinically significant aerosol generation was found by particle counting of the whole chamber air volume during simulated suction procedures. Conclusion Simulated ear suction clearance and air-fluid interface suction does not generate any significant aerosol. It appears likely that any aerosol potentially generated at the suction tube tip is entrained by incoming air flow. This is the first study to quantify aerosols generated by suction in a controlled environment; further research is required to determine its clinical implications.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X211027125
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammed Bahgat MSc, MRCS
Leon Lindsey FRCS
Paul Lindsey
Andrew Knight MSc
spellingShingle Mohammed Bahgat MSc, MRCS
Leon Lindsey FRCS
Paul Lindsey
Andrew Knight MSc
Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction
OTO Open
author_facet Mohammed Bahgat MSc, MRCS
Leon Lindsey FRCS
Paul Lindsey
Andrew Knight MSc
author_sort Mohammed Bahgat MSc, MRCS
title Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction
title_short Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction
title_full Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction
title_fullStr Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol Generation in Ear Canal and Air-Fluid Interface Suction
title_sort aerosol generation in ear canal and air-fluid interface suction
publisher SAGE Publishing
series OTO Open
issn 2473-974X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Objective The identification of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) is important during the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to aerosol-mediated virus transmission. Aerosol measurement during clinical procedures using particle counting may be confounded by variable natural background aerosol levels or limited by partial volume sampling. The study objective was to quantify any significant aerosol generated from simulated suction clearance procedures. Study Design Prospective quantification of aerosol generation during clinical suction simulation. Setting Clean chamber. Methods We created a clean environment for particle counting in a transparent neutralized polypropylene chamber. Air was passed through a HEPA 14 class filter to maintain a constant chamber inlet pressure. An optical particle counter was connected in line to the chamber exhaust vent to measure all of the vented particles. The chamber background count was 1 particle ≥0.3 µm per 15 minutes at a flow rate of 1 chamber air change per minute. We used this system to quantify very low aerosol counts generated from suction clearance of a silicone ear canal and at an open air-fluid interface. Results No clinically significant aerosol generation was found by particle counting of the whole chamber air volume during simulated suction procedures. Conclusion Simulated ear suction clearance and air-fluid interface suction does not generate any significant aerosol. It appears likely that any aerosol potentially generated at the suction tube tip is entrained by incoming air flow. This is the first study to quantify aerosols generated by suction in a controlled environment; further research is required to determine its clinical implications.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X211027125
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedbahgatmscmrcs aerosolgenerationinearcanalandairfluidinterfacesuction
AT leonlindseyfrcs aerosolgenerationinearcanalandairfluidinterfacesuction
AT paullindsey aerosolgenerationinearcanalandairfluidinterfacesuction
AT andrewknightmsc aerosolgenerationinearcanalandairfluidinterfacesuction
_version_ 1721317064059125760