The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game.
This paper explores the psychological contracts of male players and coaches in British commercial basketball, and the ways in which these might be shaped by the constraining and enabling pressures of athletic talent migration. It draws on qualitative interview data to argue that commercialising chan...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UACES
2007-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Contemporary European Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/57 |
id |
doaj-3c5e718771f849e4a0a6c9ebeefe5cf5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3c5e718771f849e4a0a6c9ebeefe5cf52020-11-25T03:59:18ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2007-11-0133The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game.Valerie Owen-Pugh0Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of LeicesterThis paper explores the psychological contracts of male players and coaches in British commercial basketball, and the ways in which these might be shaped by the constraining and enabling pressures of athletic talent migration. It draws on qualitative interview data to argue that commercialising changes in the game’s recent history have led to the emergence of divergent forms of psychological contract between coaches and players. These have promoted the interests of the game’s migrant Americans at the expense of its indigenous athletes. In particular, while the Americans reap the benefits of a high social reputation, material rewards and career development, many indigenous athletes working in the top-flight clubs struggle to gain remuneration and court-time and must fall back on their own resources to build self-confidence and self-respect. It is argued that this marginalising process was intensified following the Bosman ruling of 1995, which led to the exodus of many skilled indigenous players from the UK and prompted the commercial league to make more extensive use of Americans. Interpretation of the study’s findings is informed by Elias’ theory of established-outsider relations.https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/57SportMigrationBasketballCoachingPsychological ContractBosman |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Valerie Owen-Pugh |
spellingShingle |
Valerie Owen-Pugh The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game. Journal of Contemporary European Research Sport Migration Basketball Coaching Psychological Contract Bosman |
author_facet |
Valerie Owen-Pugh |
author_sort |
Valerie Owen-Pugh |
title |
The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game. |
title_short |
The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game. |
title_full |
The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game. |
title_fullStr |
The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Commercialising of British Men’s Basketball: Psychological Contracts Between Coaches and Players in the Post-Bosman Game. |
title_sort |
commercialising of british men’s basketball: psychological contracts between coaches and players in the post-bosman game. |
publisher |
UACES |
series |
Journal of Contemporary European Research |
issn |
1815-347X |
publishDate |
2007-11-01 |
description |
This paper explores the psychological contracts of male players and coaches in British commercial basketball, and the ways in which these might be shaped by the constraining and enabling pressures of athletic talent migration. It draws on qualitative interview data to argue that commercialising changes in the game’s recent history have led to the emergence of divergent forms of psychological contract between coaches and players. These have promoted the interests of the game’s migrant Americans at the expense of its indigenous athletes. In particular, while the Americans reap the benefits of a high social reputation, material rewards and career development, many indigenous athletes working in the top-flight clubs struggle to gain remuneration and court-time and must fall back on their own resources to build self-confidence and self-respect. It is argued that this marginalising process was intensified following the Bosman ruling of 1995, which led to the exodus of many skilled indigenous players from the UK and prompted the commercial league to make more extensive use of Americans. Interpretation of the study’s findings is informed by Elias’ theory of established-outsider relations. |
topic |
Sport Migration Basketball Coaching Psychological Contract Bosman |
url |
https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/57 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT valerieowenpugh thecommercialisingofbritishmensbasketballpsychologicalcontractsbetweencoachesandplayersinthepostbosmangame AT valerieowenpugh commercialisingofbritishmensbasketballpsychologicalcontractsbetweencoachesandplayersinthepostbosmangame |
_version_ |
1724454713181601792 |