The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park

In recent decades, the influence of anthropogenic impact on aquatic ecosystems has increased. This has led to a restructuring of aquatic ecosystems and affected the structural and functional organization of groups of aquatic organisms, causing qualitative and quantitative changes. Particular attenti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. V. Burian, V. M. Trokhymets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oles Honchar Dnipro National University 2017-05-01
Series:Biosystems Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ecology.dp.ua/index.php/ECO/article/view/735
id doaj-3c45468b4b4a4c578d2b0b0a48d40381
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c45468b4b4a4c578d2b0b0a48d403812020-11-24T23:21:56ZengOles Honchar Dnipro National UniversityBiosystems Diversity2519-85132520-25292017-05-0125212413110.15421/011719735The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National ParkZ. V. Burian0V. M. Trokhymets1Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National UniversityTaras Shevchenko Kyiv National UniversityIn recent decades, the influence of anthropogenic impact on aquatic ecosystems has increased. This has led to a restructuring of aquatic ecosystems and affected the structural and functional organization of groups of aquatic organisms, causing qualitative and quantitative changes. Particular attention is drawn to the different types of water bodies of protected areas like IchnyanskyNational Park, which is located in Ichnyansky district of Chernihiv region. This park is a newly created one, so the reduction in intensity of anthropogenic pressure can be traced within its waters. Zooplankton plays an important role in the functioning of trophic networks because it transfers energy from producers and primary consumers to young fish and planktonophagous fish. Therefore, three main groups of zooplankton were chosen as the object of study: rotifers (class Eurotatoria), cladocerans (class Branchiopoda, order Cladocera), different age stages of copepods (class Copepoda), and also ostracods (Class Ostracoda). The zooplankton used as research material was collected in the daytime in spring (April), summer (late July – early August) and autumn (late September – early October) in the years 2015–2016 from ten experimental stations. During this period 81 species of zooplankton were recorded within heterogeneous reservoirs of IchnianskyNational Park. Monogonont rotifers (subclass Monogononta) included 35 species (43% of all species) and bdelloid rotifers (subclass Bdelloidea), cladocerns, comprised 28 species (35%), and copepods included 18 species (22%). The faunal range of zooplankton over different years and seasons was characterized by the predominance of the rotator complex in spring, rotator-cladocerans and cladocerans in summer, and of the cladocerans complex in autumn. This was due to the formation during spring and summer of favourable conditions in the waters for filter feeders, which consist generally of rotifers and cladocerans. In autumn the water released large amounts of organic matter that caused a reduction in the species diversity of rotifers. Zooplankton also is characterized by the considerable ecological diversity. The range of environmental groups of zooplankton over two years was characterized by a predominance of the pelagic and benthic group of phytophiles. Pelagic representatives included 35 (43%) of 81 species, the bottom group – 20 (25%), phytophiles – 26 (32%). Rotifers dominated in the pelagic group – 18 (51%) species out of 35, and cladocerans – among the bottom group – 10 (50%) species out of 20. Zooplankton species also are distinguished by their feeding type. They represented three trophic groups: peaceful – 64 (79%) out of 81 species, omnivorous – 6 (7%) and predators – 11 (14%). Quantitative indicators of zooplankton at most stations in different seasons were defined as “very low” (less than 5,000 ind./m3 and less than 0.3 g/m3), “low” (5,000–50,000 ind./m3 and 0.3–1.0 g/m3), “below average” (5,000–50,000 ind./m3 and 0.3–1.0 g/m3) rates, occasionally – "average" (51–250,000 ind./m3 and 1.1–5.0 g/m3), “medium high” (501,000–1,000,000 ind./m3 and 1.1–5.0 g/m3). High densities of zooplankton were recorded in spring for a temporary reservoir and amounted to 3,016,000 ind./m3.https://ecology.dp.ua/index.php/ECO/article/view/735zooplanktonprotected areaUkraine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. V. Burian
V. M. Trokhymets
spellingShingle Z. V. Burian
V. M. Trokhymets
The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park
Biosystems Diversity
zooplankton
protected area
Ukraine
author_facet Z. V. Burian
V. M. Trokhymets
author_sort Z. V. Burian
title The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park
title_short The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park
title_full The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park
title_fullStr The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park
title_full_unstemmed The temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within Ichniansky National Park
title_sort temporal dynamics of zooplankton communities of different types of water bodies within ichniansky national park
publisher Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
series Biosystems Diversity
issn 2519-8513
2520-2529
publishDate 2017-05-01
description In recent decades, the influence of anthropogenic impact on aquatic ecosystems has increased. This has led to a restructuring of aquatic ecosystems and affected the structural and functional organization of groups of aquatic organisms, causing qualitative and quantitative changes. Particular attention is drawn to the different types of water bodies of protected areas like IchnyanskyNational Park, which is located in Ichnyansky district of Chernihiv region. This park is a newly created one, so the reduction in intensity of anthropogenic pressure can be traced within its waters. Zooplankton plays an important role in the functioning of trophic networks because it transfers energy from producers and primary consumers to young fish and planktonophagous fish. Therefore, three main groups of zooplankton were chosen as the object of study: rotifers (class Eurotatoria), cladocerans (class Branchiopoda, order Cladocera), different age stages of copepods (class Copepoda), and also ostracods (Class Ostracoda). The zooplankton used as research material was collected in the daytime in spring (April), summer (late July – early August) and autumn (late September – early October) in the years 2015–2016 from ten experimental stations. During this period 81 species of zooplankton were recorded within heterogeneous reservoirs of IchnianskyNational Park. Monogonont rotifers (subclass Monogononta) included 35 species (43% of all species) and bdelloid rotifers (subclass Bdelloidea), cladocerns, comprised 28 species (35%), and copepods included 18 species (22%). The faunal range of zooplankton over different years and seasons was characterized by the predominance of the rotator complex in spring, rotator-cladocerans and cladocerans in summer, and of the cladocerans complex in autumn. This was due to the formation during spring and summer of favourable conditions in the waters for filter feeders, which consist generally of rotifers and cladocerans. In autumn the water released large amounts of organic matter that caused a reduction in the species diversity of rotifers. Zooplankton also is characterized by the considerable ecological diversity. The range of environmental groups of zooplankton over two years was characterized by a predominance of the pelagic and benthic group of phytophiles. Pelagic representatives included 35 (43%) of 81 species, the bottom group – 20 (25%), phytophiles – 26 (32%). Rotifers dominated in the pelagic group – 18 (51%) species out of 35, and cladocerans – among the bottom group – 10 (50%) species out of 20. Zooplankton species also are distinguished by their feeding type. They represented three trophic groups: peaceful – 64 (79%) out of 81 species, omnivorous – 6 (7%) and predators – 11 (14%). Quantitative indicators of zooplankton at most stations in different seasons were defined as “very low” (less than 5,000 ind./m3 and less than 0.3 g/m3), “low” (5,000–50,000 ind./m3 and 0.3–1.0 g/m3), “below average” (5,000–50,000 ind./m3 and 0.3–1.0 g/m3) rates, occasionally – "average" (51–250,000 ind./m3 and 1.1–5.0 g/m3), “medium high” (501,000–1,000,000 ind./m3 and 1.1–5.0 g/m3). High densities of zooplankton were recorded in spring for a temporary reservoir and amounted to 3,016,000 ind./m3.
topic zooplankton
protected area
Ukraine
url https://ecology.dp.ua/index.php/ECO/article/view/735
work_keys_str_mv AT zvburian thetemporaldynamicsofzooplanktoncommunitiesofdifferenttypesofwaterbodieswithinichnianskynationalpark
AT vmtrokhymets thetemporaldynamicsofzooplanktoncommunitiesofdifferenttypesofwaterbodieswithinichnianskynationalpark
AT zvburian temporaldynamicsofzooplanktoncommunitiesofdifferenttypesofwaterbodieswithinichnianskynationalpark
AT vmtrokhymets temporaldynamicsofzooplanktoncommunitiesofdifferenttypesofwaterbodieswithinichnianskynationalpark
_version_ 1725569370306904064