| Summary: | Lawmaking was related to the state sovereignty exclusively, more than the
other government acts, and an interference of the another actors was forbidden.
Then the answer of ‘why is a rule binding?’ referred to local reasons such as
legitimacy, religious roots of rule or will of government. This circumstance has
been changed by internationalization of law and international agreements became
source of rights and obligations. Non-exclusive process of lawmaking continues so
now rules are binding that neither government nor citizens have role in making
them. Is there any evolution in the basses of law? Why is such a rule supposed to
be binding by subjects of law? It can be explained by globalization as a non-legal
phenomenon. Lifting out is the main element of globalization which is tied to
abstraction and objectivity. Consequently transition of legal rules, with local and
subjective bases, beyond political borders is impossible in global era. Applying
the elements of good governance (like transparency, participation and consensusoriented)
more over protecting and promoting of international human rights, as
an element of good governance and alternative of global morality, lead to
objectivity of the bases of rules.
|
|---|
