Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children

Abilities of conservation (of number, length, volume, etc.) tend to appear between 6 and 10 years of age. According to the Piaget's theory, the conservation abilities on different domains are supposed to appear at about the same age because their development is related to the concrete operat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matija Svetina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Psychologists' Association 2005-04-01
Series:Psihološka Obzorja
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2005_1/svetina.pdf
id doaj-3c33060838e64949b6c7a4e70dc2c69b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c33060838e64949b6c7a4e70dc2c69b2020-11-24T22:32:01ZengSlovenian Psychologists' AssociationPsihološka Obzorja2350-51412005-04-01141101118171Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in childrenMatija SvetinaAbilities of conservation (of number, length, volume, etc.) tend to appear between 6 and 10 years of age. According to the Piaget's theory, the conservation abilities on different domains are supposed to appear at about the same age because their development is related to the concrete operational thinking. Most of the empirical evidence, however, did not support this assumption, suggesting that conservation on specific domains (e. g. number) tends to appear earlier in regard to other domains (e. g. liquid, volume). In addition, children often showed understanding of conservation when presented with every-day problems, but failed to explain the same problem on its logical level. The problem of the present research was twofold: to determine the developmental priority of either domain of conservation, and to better comprehend the relation between logical, experiential, and perceptual understanding of conservation in children. In the study, 153 children, aged 6 to 8 years, were presented with two Piagetian problems of conservation: number and liquid tasks. The results suggested that understanding of the first task (conservation of number) seems to be necessary for understanding of the other task (conservation of liquid). In addition, experiential thinking seems to play an important role in the development of conservation. The findings can be partly explained in terms of the Vigotsky's zone of proximal development, yet they rise hypotheses that still call for further empirical justification.http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2005_1/svetina.pdfchildhood developmentcognitive developmentconservationlogical thinkingexperiential thinking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matija Svetina
spellingShingle Matija Svetina
Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
Psihološka Obzorja
childhood development
cognitive development
conservation
logical thinking
experiential thinking
author_facet Matija Svetina
author_sort Matija Svetina
title Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
title_short Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
title_full Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
title_fullStr Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
title_full_unstemmed Experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
title_sort experiential thinking as transition between pre-operational and operational thinking in children
publisher Slovenian Psychologists' Association
series Psihološka Obzorja
issn 2350-5141
publishDate 2005-04-01
description Abilities of conservation (of number, length, volume, etc.) tend to appear between 6 and 10 years of age. According to the Piaget's theory, the conservation abilities on different domains are supposed to appear at about the same age because their development is related to the concrete operational thinking. Most of the empirical evidence, however, did not support this assumption, suggesting that conservation on specific domains (e. g. number) tends to appear earlier in regard to other domains (e. g. liquid, volume). In addition, children often showed understanding of conservation when presented with every-day problems, but failed to explain the same problem on its logical level. The problem of the present research was twofold: to determine the developmental priority of either domain of conservation, and to better comprehend the relation between logical, experiential, and perceptual understanding of conservation in children. In the study, 153 children, aged 6 to 8 years, were presented with two Piagetian problems of conservation: number and liquid tasks. The results suggested that understanding of the first task (conservation of number) seems to be necessary for understanding of the other task (conservation of liquid). In addition, experiential thinking seems to play an important role in the development of conservation. The findings can be partly explained in terms of the Vigotsky's zone of proximal development, yet they rise hypotheses that still call for further empirical justification.
topic childhood development
cognitive development
conservation
logical thinking
experiential thinking
url http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2005_1/svetina.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT matijasvetina experientialthinkingastransitionbetweenpreoperationalandoperationalthinkinginchildren
_version_ 1716507136065798144