Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?

Purpose. It was to quantify the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the sonographic measurements of renal pelvis and classify hydronephrosis severity. Methods. Two ultrasonographers evaluated 17 fetuses from 23 to 39 weeks of gestation. Renal pelvis APD were taken in 50 renal units. For i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alamanda Kfoury Pereira, Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis, Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada, Eduardo Araújo de Oliveira, Gabriel Osanan, Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/861865
id doaj-3c23739b270a4cbaafa1dfbc58672afb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c23739b270a4cbaafa1dfbc58672afb2020-11-24T23:54:04ZengHindawi LimitedObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972011-01-01201110.1155/2011/861865861865Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?Alamanda Kfoury Pereira0Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis1Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada2Eduardo Araújo de Oliveira3Gabriel Osanan4Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral5Fetal Medicine Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30.130-100, BrazilFetal Medicine Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30.130-100, BrazilFetal Medicine Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30.130-100, BrazilFetal Medicine Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30.130-100, BrazilFetal Medicine Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30.130-100, BrazilFetal Medicine Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30.130-100, BrazilPurpose. It was to quantify the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the sonographic measurements of renal pelvis and classify hydronephrosis severity. Methods. Two ultrasonographers evaluated 17 fetuses from 23 to 39 weeks of gestation. Renal pelvis APD were taken in 50 renal units. For intraobserver error, one of them performed three sequential measurements. The mean and standard deviation from the absolute and percentage differences between measurements were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were used to visually assess the relationship between the precision of repeated measurements. Hydronephrosis was classified as mild (5.0 to 9.9 mm), moderate (10.0 to 14.9 mm), or severe (≥15.0 mm). Interrater agreement were obtained using the Kappa index. Results. Absolute intraobserver variation in APD measurements was 5.2±3.5%. Interobserver variation of ultrasonographers was 9.3±9.7%. Neither intraobserver or interobserver error increased with increasing APD size. The overall percentage of agreement with the antenatal hydronephrosis diagnosis was 64%. Cohen's Kappa to hydronephrosis severity was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69). Conclusion. Inter and intraobserver APD measurement errors were low in these group, but the agreement to hydronephrosis diagnosis and classification was fair. We suggest that standard and serial APD measurement can better define and evaluate fetal hydronephrosis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/861865
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alamanda Kfoury Pereira
Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada
Eduardo Araújo de Oliveira
Gabriel Osanan
Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral
spellingShingle Alamanda Kfoury Pereira
Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada
Eduardo Araújo de Oliveira
Gabriel Osanan
Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral
Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
author_facet Alamanda Kfoury Pereira
Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada
Eduardo Araújo de Oliveira
Gabriel Osanan
Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral
author_sort Alamanda Kfoury Pereira
title Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?
title_short Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?
title_full Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?
title_fullStr Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?
title_full_unstemmed Antenatal Ultrasonographic Anteroposterior Renal Pelvis Diameter Measurement: Is It a Reliable Way of Defining Fetal Hydronephrosis?
title_sort antenatal ultrasonographic anteroposterior renal pelvis diameter measurement: is it a reliable way of defining fetal hydronephrosis?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Obstetrics and Gynecology International
issn 1687-9589
1687-9597
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Purpose. It was to quantify the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the sonographic measurements of renal pelvis and classify hydronephrosis severity. Methods. Two ultrasonographers evaluated 17 fetuses from 23 to 39 weeks of gestation. Renal pelvis APD were taken in 50 renal units. For intraobserver error, one of them performed three sequential measurements. The mean and standard deviation from the absolute and percentage differences between measurements were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were used to visually assess the relationship between the precision of repeated measurements. Hydronephrosis was classified as mild (5.0 to 9.9 mm), moderate (10.0 to 14.9 mm), or severe (≥15.0 mm). Interrater agreement were obtained using the Kappa index. Results. Absolute intraobserver variation in APD measurements was 5.2±3.5%. Interobserver variation of ultrasonographers was 9.3±9.7%. Neither intraobserver or interobserver error increased with increasing APD size. The overall percentage of agreement with the antenatal hydronephrosis diagnosis was 64%. Cohen's Kappa to hydronephrosis severity was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69). Conclusion. Inter and intraobserver APD measurement errors were low in these group, but the agreement to hydronephrosis diagnosis and classification was fair. We suggest that standard and serial APD measurement can better define and evaluate fetal hydronephrosis.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/861865
work_keys_str_mv AT alamandakfourypereira antenatalultrasonographicanteroposteriorrenalpelvisdiametermeasurementisitareliablewayofdefiningfetalhydronephrosis
AT zilmasilveiranogueirareis antenatalultrasonographicanteroposteriorrenalpelvisdiametermeasurementisitareliablewayofdefiningfetalhydronephrosis
AT mariacandidaferrarezbouzada antenatalultrasonographicanteroposteriorrenalpelvisdiametermeasurementisitareliablewayofdefiningfetalhydronephrosis
AT eduardoaraujodeoliveira antenatalultrasonographicanteroposteriorrenalpelvisdiametermeasurementisitareliablewayofdefiningfetalhydronephrosis
AT gabrielosanan antenatalultrasonographicanteroposteriorrenalpelvisdiametermeasurementisitareliablewayofdefiningfetalhydronephrosis
AT antoniocarlosvieiracabral antenatalultrasonographicanteroposteriorrenalpelvisdiametermeasurementisitareliablewayofdefiningfetalhydronephrosis
_version_ 1725467447913349120