Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?

Running a red light can cause severe traffic crashes especially when one vehicle runs into the side of another. Red light cameras photograph violators who are sent traffic tickets by mail. Intuitively, cameras appear to be a good idea. However, comprehensive studies conclude cameras actually increas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Langland-Orban, Etienne E. Pracht, John T. Large
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of North Florida 2008-03-01
Series:Florida Public Health Review
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=fphr
id doaj-3c1b0de0e996429fa568781fb85a30a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c1b0de0e996429fa568781fb85a30a52020-11-24T22:21:00ZengUniversity of North FloridaFlorida Public Health Review2643-62482008-03-01517Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?Barbara Langland-Orban0Etienne E. Pracht1John T. Large2Department of Health Policy and Management, University of South FloridaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of South FloridaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of South FloridaRunning a red light can cause severe traffic crashes especially when one vehicle runs into the side of another. Red light cameras photograph violators who are sent traffic tickets by mail. Intuitively, cameras appear to be a good idea. However, comprehensive studies conclude cameras actually increase crashes and injuries, providing a safety argument not to install them. Presently, Florida statutes do not permit red light camera evidence to be used as the sole basis for ticketing drivers for violating the law. Legislation to permit camera citations has been proposed since the 1990s, but none has passed to date. This paper explains red light running trends in Florida; effective solutions to reduce red light running; findings from major camera evaluations; examples of flawed evaluations; the automobile insurance financial interest in cameras; and the increased likelihood of even higher crash and injury rates if cameras are used in Florida due to the high percent of elderly drivers and passengers. The theory behind red light cameras as potentially effective is that they rely on deterring red light running primarily through punishment of a specific driving behavior and secondarily by changing drivers’ experience. Because the rigorous and robust studies conclude that cameras are associated with increased crashes and costs, any economic analysis of cameras should include these newly generated costs to the public. Indirect costs to the public are usually not considered in the calculation of total revenues and profits generated from red light cameras. Florida should be cautious in using traffic safety information from the automobile insurance industry. Insurance financial goals are to increase their revenues and profits, which do not necessarily include reducing traffic crashes, injuries or fatalities. Also, public policy should avoid conflicts of interest that enhance revenues for government and private interests at the risk of public safety.https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=fphr
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barbara Langland-Orban
Etienne E. Pracht
John T. Large
spellingShingle Barbara Langland-Orban
Etienne E. Pracht
John T. Large
Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?
Florida Public Health Review
author_facet Barbara Langland-Orban
Etienne E. Pracht
John T. Large
author_sort Barbara Langland-Orban
title Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?
title_short Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?
title_full Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?
title_fullStr Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?
title_full_unstemmed Red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?
title_sort red light running cameras: would crashes, injuries and automobile insurance rates increase if they are used in florida?
publisher University of North Florida
series Florida Public Health Review
issn 2643-6248
publishDate 2008-03-01
description Running a red light can cause severe traffic crashes especially when one vehicle runs into the side of another. Red light cameras photograph violators who are sent traffic tickets by mail. Intuitively, cameras appear to be a good idea. However, comprehensive studies conclude cameras actually increase crashes and injuries, providing a safety argument not to install them. Presently, Florida statutes do not permit red light camera evidence to be used as the sole basis for ticketing drivers for violating the law. Legislation to permit camera citations has been proposed since the 1990s, but none has passed to date. This paper explains red light running trends in Florida; effective solutions to reduce red light running; findings from major camera evaluations; examples of flawed evaluations; the automobile insurance financial interest in cameras; and the increased likelihood of even higher crash and injury rates if cameras are used in Florida due to the high percent of elderly drivers and passengers. The theory behind red light cameras as potentially effective is that they rely on deterring red light running primarily through punishment of a specific driving behavior and secondarily by changing drivers’ experience. Because the rigorous and robust studies conclude that cameras are associated with increased crashes and costs, any economic analysis of cameras should include these newly generated costs to the public. Indirect costs to the public are usually not considered in the calculation of total revenues and profits generated from red light cameras. Florida should be cautious in using traffic safety information from the automobile insurance industry. Insurance financial goals are to increase their revenues and profits, which do not necessarily include reducing traffic crashes, injuries or fatalities. Also, public policy should avoid conflicts of interest that enhance revenues for government and private interests at the risk of public safety.
url https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=fphr
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaralanglandorban redlightrunningcameraswouldcrashesinjuriesandautomobileinsuranceratesincreaseiftheyareusedinflorida
AT etienneepracht redlightrunningcameraswouldcrashesinjuriesandautomobileinsuranceratesincreaseiftheyareusedinflorida
AT johntlarge redlightrunningcameraswouldcrashesinjuriesandautomobileinsuranceratesincreaseiftheyareusedinflorida
_version_ 1725772880053010432