Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.

Computer and internet based questionnaires have become a standard tool in Human-Computer Interaction research and other related fields, such as psychology and sociology. Amazon's Mechanical Turk (AMT) service is a new method of recruiting participants and conducting certain types of experiments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph Bartneck, Andreas Duenser, Elena Moltchanova, Karolina Zawieska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4397064?pdf=render
id doaj-3c16e958f9184281aaa5f6cf7a7468ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c16e958f9184281aaa5f6cf7a7468ce2020-11-25T01:27:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012159510.1371/journal.pone.0121595Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.Christoph BartneckAndreas DuenserElena MoltchanovaKarolina ZawieskaComputer and internet based questionnaires have become a standard tool in Human-Computer Interaction research and other related fields, such as psychology and sociology. Amazon's Mechanical Turk (AMT) service is a new method of recruiting participants and conducting certain types of experiments. This study compares whether participants recruited through AMT give different responses than participants recruited through an online forum or recruited directly on a university campus. Moreover, we compare whether a study conducted within AMT results in different responses compared to a study for which participants are recruited through AMT but which is conducted using an external online questionnaire service. The results of this study show that there is a statistical difference between results obtained from participants recruited through AMT compared to the results from the participant recruited on campus or through online forums. We do, however, argue that this difference is so small that it has no practical consequence. There was no significant difference between running the study within AMT compared to running it with an online questionnaire service. There was no significant difference between results obtained directly from within AMT compared to results obtained in the campus and online forum condition. This may suggest that AMT is a viable and economical option for recruiting participants and for conducting studies as setting up and running a study with AMT generally requires less effort and time compared to other frequently used methods. We discuss our findings as well as limitations of using AMT for empirical studies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4397064?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christoph Bartneck
Andreas Duenser
Elena Moltchanova
Karolina Zawieska
spellingShingle Christoph Bartneck
Andreas Duenser
Elena Moltchanova
Karolina Zawieska
Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Christoph Bartneck
Andreas Duenser
Elena Moltchanova
Karolina Zawieska
author_sort Christoph Bartneck
title Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
title_short Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
title_full Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
title_fullStr Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
title_sort comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in amazon's mechanical turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Computer and internet based questionnaires have become a standard tool in Human-Computer Interaction research and other related fields, such as psychology and sociology. Amazon's Mechanical Turk (AMT) service is a new method of recruiting participants and conducting certain types of experiments. This study compares whether participants recruited through AMT give different responses than participants recruited through an online forum or recruited directly on a university campus. Moreover, we compare whether a study conducted within AMT results in different responses compared to a study for which participants are recruited through AMT but which is conducted using an external online questionnaire service. The results of this study show that there is a statistical difference between results obtained from participants recruited through AMT compared to the results from the participant recruited on campus or through online forums. We do, however, argue that this difference is so small that it has no practical consequence. There was no significant difference between running the study within AMT compared to running it with an online questionnaire service. There was no significant difference between results obtained directly from within AMT compared to results obtained in the campus and online forum condition. This may suggest that AMT is a viable and economical option for recruiting participants and for conducting studies as setting up and running a study with AMT generally requires less effort and time compared to other frequently used methods. We discuss our findings as well as limitations of using AMT for empirical studies.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4397064?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT christophbartneck comparingthesimilarityofresponsesreceivedfromstudiesinamazonsmechanicalturktostudiesconductedonlineandwithdirectrecruitment
AT andreasduenser comparingthesimilarityofresponsesreceivedfromstudiesinamazonsmechanicalturktostudiesconductedonlineandwithdirectrecruitment
AT elenamoltchanova comparingthesimilarityofresponsesreceivedfromstudiesinamazonsmechanicalturktostudiesconductedonlineandwithdirectrecruitment
AT karolinazawieska comparingthesimilarityofresponsesreceivedfromstudiesinamazonsmechanicalturktostudiesconductedonlineandwithdirectrecruitment
_version_ 1725107514932985856