Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia

Domestic criminal legislation provides for possibility of releasing from criminal liability a person who has committed a crime of small or medium gravity for the first time, provided that he/she has reconciled with the victim and made amends for the harm caused. Comparative legal analysis shows that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zakharchuk Sergey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/20/e3sconf_emmft2020_12021.pdf
id doaj-3c0f3b34d4174590bda1ff153a803cfe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c0f3b34d4174590bda1ff153a803cfe2021-04-06T13:49:25ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-012441202110.1051/e3sconf/202124412021e3sconf_emmft2020_12021Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of RussiaZakharchuk Sergey0Tyumen Institute for Advanced Training of Employees of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russian FederationDomestic criminal legislation provides for possibility of releasing from criminal liability a person who has committed a crime of small or medium gravity for the first time, provided that he/she has reconciled with the victim and made amends for the harm caused. Comparative legal analysis shows that similar norms are found in the criminal laws of foreign states. The article discusses issues related to the possibility of terminating a criminal case in connection with the reconciliation of parties in the event that a victim is a representative of authorities. As a result of analysis of scientific positions on this issue, as well as corresponding law enforcement practice, ambiguity in approaches to its solution was revealed. The presence of certain contradictions in the area under study is also confirmed by statistical information. The author substantiates the position on the need to establish a ban on exemption from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation with the victim, if a crime is committed against justice or the order of administration, and the victim is a representative of authorities. In this case, the victim acts as an additional objective manifestation of encroachment, and therefore, reconciliation cannot eliminate the harm done to the interests of the state - the main object of criminal encroachment. In order to resolve the problem, it is proposed to amend Article 76 of Criminal Code of Russian Federation.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/20/e3sconf_emmft2020_12021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zakharchuk Sergey
spellingShingle Zakharchuk Sergey
Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Zakharchuk Sergey
author_sort Zakharchuk Sergey
title Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia
title_short Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia
title_full Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia
title_fullStr Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia
title_full_unstemmed Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia
title_sort environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of russia
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Domestic criminal legislation provides for possibility of releasing from criminal liability a person who has committed a crime of small or medium gravity for the first time, provided that he/she has reconciled with the victim and made amends for the harm caused. Comparative legal analysis shows that similar norms are found in the criminal laws of foreign states. The article discusses issues related to the possibility of terminating a criminal case in connection with the reconciliation of parties in the event that a victim is a representative of authorities. As a result of analysis of scientific positions on this issue, as well as corresponding law enforcement practice, ambiguity in approaches to its solution was revealed. The presence of certain contradictions in the area under study is also confirmed by statistical information. The author substantiates the position on the need to establish a ban on exemption from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation with the victim, if a crime is committed against justice or the order of administration, and the victim is a representative of authorities. In this case, the victim acts as an additional objective manifestation of encroachment, and therefore, reconciliation cannot eliminate the harm done to the interests of the state - the main object of criminal encroachment. In order to resolve the problem, it is proposed to amend Article 76 of Criminal Code of Russian Federation.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/20/e3sconf_emmft2020_12021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zakharchuksergey environmentallawandreconciliationwitharepresentativeofpowerundercriminallawofrussia
_version_ 1721537958780076032