Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey
<p class="Moment-Normal">The role of media is not ignorable in relation to the expansion of populist discourse and achievement of populist movements. In different contexts, the active usage of media indicates differences for populist actors. Furthermore, the leaders can influence the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hacettepe University
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Momentdergi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.momentdergi.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/368 |
id |
doaj-3c07d22217034160a8ecfcd826dce6c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3c07d22217034160a8ecfcd826dce6c32021-07-02T09:00:12ZengHacettepe UniversityMomentdergi2148-970X2019-06-0161215Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and TurkeyEmre ErdoğanTuğçe Erçetin<p class="Moment-Normal">The role of media is not ignorable in relation to the expansion of populist discourse and achievement of populist movements. In different contexts, the active usage of media indicates differences for populist actors. Furthermore, the leaders can influence the media through their populist rhetoric and behaviours; on the one hand, they may not be visible as well. At this point, our article seeks to explain how and why populist actors become visible (or not) and use media efficiently. Hallin and Mancini (2004) has a comparative perspective on the media systems, clarifying differences among countries over three different models. Liberal, democratic corporatist and polarized pluralist models are distinguished with four dimensions, such as: media industry, political paralellism, professionalization, and the role of the state. This article argues that the media usage of populist leaders and their visibility are associated with the media systems, regarding to those mentioned four dimensions. Thus, three models are explained through the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Turkey<strong></strong></p>http://www.momentdergi.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/368popülizmmedya sistemleritürkiyebirleşik krallıkhollanda |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emre Erdoğan Tuğçe Erçetin |
spellingShingle |
Emre Erdoğan Tuğçe Erçetin Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey Momentdergi popülizm medya sistemleri türkiye birleşik krallık hollanda |
author_facet |
Emre Erdoğan Tuğçe Erçetin |
author_sort |
Emre Erdoğan |
title |
Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey |
title_short |
Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey |
title_full |
Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey |
title_fullStr |
Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Looking to the Success of Populist Leaders from the Perspective of the Media Systems: A Comparison on the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Turkey |
title_sort |
looking to the success of populist leaders from the perspective of the media systems: a comparison on the united kingdom, the netherlands and turkey |
publisher |
Hacettepe University |
series |
Momentdergi |
issn |
2148-970X |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
<p class="Moment-Normal">The role of media is not ignorable in relation to the expansion of populist discourse and achievement of populist movements. In different contexts, the active usage of media indicates differences for populist actors. Furthermore, the leaders can influence the media through their populist rhetoric and behaviours; on the one hand, they may not be visible as well. At this point, our article seeks to explain how and why populist actors become visible (or not) and use media efficiently. Hallin and Mancini (2004) has a comparative perspective on the media systems, clarifying differences among countries over three different models. Liberal, democratic corporatist and polarized pluralist models are distinguished with four dimensions, such as: media industry, political paralellism, professionalization, and the role of the state. This article argues that the media usage of populist leaders and their visibility are associated with the media systems, regarding to those mentioned four dimensions. Thus, three models are explained through the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Turkey<strong></strong></p> |
topic |
popülizm medya sistemleri türkiye birleşik krallık hollanda |
url |
http://www.momentdergi.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/368 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emreerdogan lookingtothesuccessofpopulistleadersfromtheperspectiveofthemediasystemsacomparisonontheunitedkingdomthenetherlandsandturkey AT tugceercetin lookingtothesuccessofpopulistleadersfromtheperspectiveofthemediasystemsacomparisonontheunitedkingdomthenetherlandsandturkey |
_version_ |
1721333705503408128 |