Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015

The aim of this systematic review was to examine research studies which focus on effective student support practices and show evidence of credible assessment. To identify effective student support practices, and also to provide a contemporary picture of effective support practices at the University...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paideya Vino, Bengesai Annah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 2017-12-01
Series:Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
Online Access:http://www.jsaa.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/2702
id doaj-3bfbe3bb933448349f1fb0861f3b6f0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3bfbe3bb933448349f1fb0861f3b6f0a2020-11-24T22:25:14ZengJournal of Student Affairs in AfricaJournal of Student Affairs in Africa2307-62672017-12-015210.24085/jsaa.v5i2.27022066Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015Paideya Vino0Bengesai Annah1Lecturer in the College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-NatalHead: Teaching & Learning Unit, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-NatalThe aim of this systematic review was to examine research studies which focus on effective student support practices and show evidence of credible assessment. To identify effective student support practices, and also to provide a contemporary picture of effective support practices at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, 24 studies which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and analysed in terms of: (i) aims, (ii) main participants, (iii) methodology used and (iv) the main outcomes emerging. The findings from the review indicate that there is a diversity of available evidence, ranging from assessment of peer support programmes, alternative access programmes to curriculum-based interventions. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional qualitative studies, which also draw from relatively small samples. This suggests that more large-scale studies are needed in the field in order to provide greater insight into effective student support practices. In addition, research which examines academic support programmes over long periods of time while also controlling for programme effects is recommended.http://www.jsaa.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/2702
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paideya Vino
Bengesai Annah
spellingShingle Paideya Vino
Bengesai Annah
Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
author_facet Paideya Vino
Bengesai Annah
author_sort Paideya Vino
title Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
title_short Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
title_full Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
title_fullStr Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
title_full_unstemmed Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
title_sort academic support at the university of kwazulu-natal: a systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles, 2010–2015
publisher Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
series Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
issn 2307-6267
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The aim of this systematic review was to examine research studies which focus on effective student support practices and show evidence of credible assessment. To identify effective student support practices, and also to provide a contemporary picture of effective support practices at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, 24 studies which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and analysed in terms of: (i) aims, (ii) main participants, (iii) methodology used and (iv) the main outcomes emerging. The findings from the review indicate that there is a diversity of available evidence, ranging from assessment of peer support programmes, alternative access programmes to curriculum-based interventions. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional qualitative studies, which also draw from relatively small samples. This suggests that more large-scale studies are needed in the field in order to provide greater insight into effective student support practices. In addition, research which examines academic support programmes over long periods of time while also controlling for programme effects is recommended.
url http://www.jsaa.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/2702
work_keys_str_mv AT paideyavino academicsupportattheuniversityofkwazulunatalasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedjournalarticles20102015
AT bengesaiannah academicsupportattheuniversityofkwazulunatalasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedjournalarticles20102015
_version_ 1725758792808792064