Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015
The aim of this systematic review was to examine research studies which focus on effective student support practices and show evidence of credible assessment. To identify effective student support practices, and also to provide a contemporary picture of effective support practices at the University...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Journal of Student Affairs in Africa
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Student Affairs in Africa |
Online Access: | http://www.jsaa.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/2702 |
id |
doaj-3bfbe3bb933448349f1fb0861f3b6f0a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3bfbe3bb933448349f1fb0861f3b6f0a2020-11-24T22:25:14ZengJournal of Student Affairs in AfricaJournal of Student Affairs in Africa2307-62672017-12-015210.24085/jsaa.v5i2.27022066Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015Paideya Vino0Bengesai Annah1Lecturer in the College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-NatalHead: Teaching & Learning Unit, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-NatalThe aim of this systematic review was to examine research studies which focus on effective student support practices and show evidence of credible assessment. To identify effective student support practices, and also to provide a contemporary picture of effective support practices at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, 24 studies which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and analysed in terms of: (i) aims, (ii) main participants, (iii) methodology used and (iv) the main outcomes emerging. The findings from the review indicate that there is a diversity of available evidence, ranging from assessment of peer support programmes, alternative access programmes to curriculum-based interventions. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional qualitative studies, which also draw from relatively small samples. This suggests that more large-scale studies are needed in the field in order to provide greater insight into effective student support practices. In addition, research which examines academic support programmes over long periods of time while also controlling for programme effects is recommended.http://www.jsaa.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/2702 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paideya Vino Bengesai Annah |
spellingShingle |
Paideya Vino Bengesai Annah Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015 Journal of Student Affairs in Africa |
author_facet |
Paideya Vino Bengesai Annah |
author_sort |
Paideya Vino |
title |
Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015 |
title_short |
Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015 |
title_full |
Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015 |
title_fullStr |
Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Academic Support at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles, 2010–2015 |
title_sort |
academic support at the university of kwazulu-natal: a systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles, 2010–2015 |
publisher |
Journal of Student Affairs in Africa |
series |
Journal of Student Affairs in Africa |
issn |
2307-6267 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
The aim of this systematic review was to examine research studies which focus on effective student support practices and show evidence of credible assessment. To identify effective student support practices, and also to provide a contemporary picture of effective support practices at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, 24 studies which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and analysed in terms of: (i) aims, (ii) main participants, (iii) methodology used and (iv) the main outcomes emerging. The findings from the review indicate that there is a diversity of available evidence, ranging from assessment of peer support programmes, alternative access programmes to curriculum-based interventions. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional qualitative studies, which also draw from relatively small samples. This suggests that more large-scale studies are needed in the field in order to provide greater insight into effective student support practices. In addition, research which examines academic support programmes over long periods of time while also controlling for programme effects is recommended. |
url |
http://www.jsaa.ac.za/index.php/jsaa/article/view/2702 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paideyavino academicsupportattheuniversityofkwazulunatalasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedjournalarticles20102015 AT bengesaiannah academicsupportattheuniversityofkwazulunatalasystematicreviewofpeerreviewedjournalarticles20102015 |
_version_ |
1725758792808792064 |