Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Non-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation can lead to esophageal insufflations and in turn to gastric distension. The fact that the latter induces transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter implies that it may increase gastroesophageal refluxes. We previously reported that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danny Cantin, Djamal Djeddi, Vincent Carrière, Nathalie Samson, Stéphanie Nault, Wan Lu Jia, Jennifer Beck, Jean-Paul Praud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718652?pdf=render
id doaj-3be49d70c862451c84e767d462bb0cd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3be49d70c862451c84e767d462bb0cd62020-11-25T01:24:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014674210.1371/journal.pone.0146742Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.Danny CantinDjamal DjeddiVincent CarrièreNathalie SamsonStéphanie NaultWan Lu JiaJennifer BeckJean-Paul PraudNon-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation can lead to esophageal insufflations and in turn to gastric distension. The fact that the latter induces transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter implies that it may increase gastroesophageal refluxes. We previously reported that nasal Pressure Support Ventilation (nPSV), contrary to nasal Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (nNAVA), triggers active inspiratory laryngeal closure. This suggests that esophageal insufflations are more frequent in nPSV than in nNAVA. The objectives of the present study were to test the hypotheses that: i) gastroesophageal refluxes are increased during nPSV compared to both control condition and nNAVA; ii) esophageal insufflations occur more frequently during nPSV than nNAVA. Polysomnographic recordings and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pHmetry were performed in nine chronically instrumented newborn lambs to study gastroesophageal refluxes, esophageal insufflations, states of alertness, laryngeal closure and respiration. Recordings were repeated without sedation in control condition, nPSV (15/4 cmH2O) and nNAVA (~ 15/4 cmH2O). The number of gastroesophageal refluxes recorded over six hours, expressed as median (interquartile range), decreased during both nPSV (1 (0, 3)) and nNAVA [1 (0, 3)] compared to control condition (5 (3, 10)), (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the esophageal insufflation index did not differ between nPSV (40 (11, 61) h-1) and nNAVA (10 (9, 56) h-1) (p = 0.8). In conclusion, nPSV and nNAVA similarly inhibit gastroesophageal refluxes in healthy newborn lambs at pressures that do not lead to gastric distension. In addition, the occurrence of esophageal insufflations is not significantly different between nPSV and nNAVA. The strong inhibitory effect of nIPPV on gastroesophageal refluxes appears identical to that reported with nasal continuous positive airway pressure.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718652?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Danny Cantin
Djamal Djeddi
Vincent Carrière
Nathalie Samson
Stéphanie Nault
Wan Lu Jia
Jennifer Beck
Jean-Paul Praud
spellingShingle Danny Cantin
Djamal Djeddi
Vincent Carrière
Nathalie Samson
Stéphanie Nault
Wan Lu Jia
Jennifer Beck
Jean-Paul Praud
Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Danny Cantin
Djamal Djeddi
Vincent Carrière
Nathalie Samson
Stéphanie Nault
Wan Lu Jia
Jennifer Beck
Jean-Paul Praud
author_sort Danny Cantin
title Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.
title_short Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.
title_full Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.
title_fullStr Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory Effect of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux.
title_sort inhibitory effect of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on gastroesophageal reflux.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Non-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation can lead to esophageal insufflations and in turn to gastric distension. The fact that the latter induces transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter implies that it may increase gastroesophageal refluxes. We previously reported that nasal Pressure Support Ventilation (nPSV), contrary to nasal Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (nNAVA), triggers active inspiratory laryngeal closure. This suggests that esophageal insufflations are more frequent in nPSV than in nNAVA. The objectives of the present study were to test the hypotheses that: i) gastroesophageal refluxes are increased during nPSV compared to both control condition and nNAVA; ii) esophageal insufflations occur more frequently during nPSV than nNAVA. Polysomnographic recordings and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pHmetry were performed in nine chronically instrumented newborn lambs to study gastroesophageal refluxes, esophageal insufflations, states of alertness, laryngeal closure and respiration. Recordings were repeated without sedation in control condition, nPSV (15/4 cmH2O) and nNAVA (~ 15/4 cmH2O). The number of gastroesophageal refluxes recorded over six hours, expressed as median (interquartile range), decreased during both nPSV (1 (0, 3)) and nNAVA [1 (0, 3)] compared to control condition (5 (3, 10)), (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the esophageal insufflation index did not differ between nPSV (40 (11, 61) h-1) and nNAVA (10 (9, 56) h-1) (p = 0.8). In conclusion, nPSV and nNAVA similarly inhibit gastroesophageal refluxes in healthy newborn lambs at pressures that do not lead to gastric distension. In addition, the occurrence of esophageal insufflations is not significantly different between nPSV and nNAVA. The strong inhibitory effect of nIPPV on gastroesophageal refluxes appears identical to that reported with nasal continuous positive airway pressure.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718652?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT dannycantin inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT djamaldjeddi inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT vincentcarriere inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT nathaliesamson inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT stephanienault inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT wanlujia inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT jenniferbeck inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
AT jeanpaulpraud inhibitoryeffectofnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationongastroesophagealreflux
_version_ 1725115955733856256