Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009

Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009

Abstract This article analyses NRK’s concluding party leaders’ debate in the 2009 election based on a method for measuring deliberation quality in debates. Subsequently, the deliberation principles are subject to a discussion of their relevance and utility in relation to modern mediated debates, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Vie Nordeide
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitetsforlaget 2013-01-01
Series:Norsk Medietidsskrift
Subjects:
Deliberation
political debates
television
normative theory
empirical research
politicaldebates
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/nmt/2013/01/lav_deliberasjonskvalitet_i_nrks_avsluttende_partilederdeba
id doaj-3be292b4e280473896ce70155f554cec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3be292b4e280473896ce70155f554cec2020-11-25T01:29:45ZengUniversitetsforlagetNorsk Medietidsskrift0804-84520805-95352013-01-0120517018948693Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009Thomas Vie NordeideAbstract This article analyses NRK’s concluding party leaders’ debate in the 2009 election based on a method for measuring deliberation quality in debates. Subsequently, the deliberation principles are subject to a discussion of their relevance and utility in relation to modern mediated debates, and to competing perspectives on the nature of politics with views of power relations other than those advocated by Habermas.https://www.idunn.no/nmt/2013/01/lav_deliberasjonskvalitet_i_nrks_avsluttende_partilederdebaDeliberationpolitical debatestelevisionnormative theoryempirical researchpoliticaldebates
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Vie Nordeide
spellingShingle Thomas Vie Nordeide
Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
Norsk Medietidsskrift
Deliberation
political debates
television
normative theory
empirical research
politicaldebates
author_facet Thomas Vie Nordeide
author_sort Thomas Vie Nordeide
title Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
title_short Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
title_full Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
title_fullStr Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
title_full_unstemmed Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
title_sort lav deliberasjonskvalitet i nrks avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009
publisher Universitetsforlaget
series Norsk Medietidsskrift
issn 0804-8452
0805-9535
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Abstract This article analyses NRK’s concluding party leaders’ debate in the 2009 election based on a method for measuring deliberation quality in debates. Subsequently, the deliberation principles are subject to a discussion of their relevance and utility in relation to modern mediated debates, and to competing perspectives on the nature of politics with views of power relations other than those advocated by Habermas.
topic Deliberation
political debates
television
normative theory
empirical research
politicaldebates
url https://www.idunn.no/nmt/2013/01/lav_deliberasjonskvalitet_i_nrks_avsluttende_partilederdeba
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasvienordeide lavdeliberasjonskvalitetinrksavsluttendepartilederdebattivalgkampen2009
_version_ 1725094937657081856

Similar Items