Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009

Lav deliberasjonskvalitet i NRKs avsluttende partilederdebatt i valgkampen 2009

Abstract This article analyses NRK’s concluding party leaders’ debate in the 2009 election based on a method for measuring deliberation quality in debates. Subsequently, the deliberation principles are subject to a discussion of their relevance and utility in relation to modern mediated debates, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Vie Nordeide
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitetsforlaget 2013-01-01
Series:Norsk Medietidsskrift
Subjects:
Deliberation
political debates
television
normative theory
empirical research
politicaldebates
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/nmt/2013/01/lav_deliberasjonskvalitet_i_nrks_avsluttende_partilederdeba
Description
Summary:Abstract This article analyses NRK’s concluding party leaders’ debate in the 2009 election based on a method for measuring deliberation quality in debates. Subsequently, the deliberation principles are subject to a discussion of their relevance and utility in relation to modern mediated debates, and to competing perspectives on the nature of politics with views of power relations other than those advocated by Habermas.
ISSN:0804-8452
0805-9535

Similar Items