REGISTERING AND REPORTING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Systematic reviews are considered as the highest rung in the ladder of evidence-based medicine. They are bound by a pre-defined structure and requirement for extensive literature searches, when compared with the more liberal format of narrative reviews. Systematic review protocols should ideally be...
Main Authors: | Pallavi Patro, Durga Prasanna Misra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
South Kazakhstan Medical Academy
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://cajmhe.com/index.php/journal/article/view/24 |
Similar Items
-
Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles—a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Hannah Jergas, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01) -
A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results
by: Rabia Bashir, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Meta-epidemiology
by: Jong-Myon Bae
Published: (2014-09-01) -
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews
by: Lisa Hartling, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study
by: Lisa Hartling, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01)