Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario

Context: Role of Ozurdex in macular edema due to various posterior segment pathologies. AIM: The aim of this study is to report outcome of Ozurdex implant in macular edema (ME) secondary to various posterior segment pathologies. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective, intervent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manish Nagpal, Navneet Mehrotra, Rakesh Juneja, Hardik Jain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-tjo.org/article.asp?issn=2211-5056;year=2018;volume=8;issue=3;spage=141;epage=148;aulast=Nagpal
id doaj-3bcb219bf29742588e072c6537e1cb4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3bcb219bf29742588e072c6537e1cb4a2020-11-25T02:30:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTaiwan Journal of Ophthalmology2211-50562211-50722018-01-018314114810.4103/tjo.tjo_62_17Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenarioManish NagpalNavneet MehrotraRakesh JunejaHardik JainContext: Role of Ozurdex in macular edema due to various posterior segment pathologies. AIM: The aim of this study is to report outcome of Ozurdex implant in macular edema (ME) secondary to various posterior segment pathologies. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective, interventional study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients of ME were treated with one or more Ozurdex implants (0.7 mg). Data collection included demographic details, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), duration of efficacy, and record of adverse events (if any) within 24 weeks. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired sample t-test, Stata data analysis, and statistical software, version 12.1, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA, were used in the study. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes of 104 patients were studied which had a diagnosis of diabetic ME (n = 46), retinal vein occlusion (n = 40), and uveitis (n = 30). The average age of patients (mean ± standard deviation) was 50.2 ± 21.9 years. Baseline mean ± SD (standard deviation) logMAR BCVA, CFT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were 0.636 ± 0.4, 527.8 ± 210.1 μm, and 15.3 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The reinjection interval was around 12–18 weeks. Ozurdex proved its efficacy in improving mean logMAR visual acuity and reduction of CFT from baseline till 12 weeks' follow-up period (0.414 ± 0.5 and 301.5 ± 278.5, respectively; P < 0.05), and after 12 weeks' follow-up, it started worsening (0.530 ± 0.9 and 444.8 ± 375.2, respectively; P > 0.05). The most common reported adverse event was significant rise of IOP (>5 mmHg), with a total of 12 cases followed by cataract 9 cases. CONCLUSION: Ozurdex implant leads to a significant improvement in BCVA and CFT values till 12 weeks, followed by a gradual decline for all the pathologies studied together. No new safety concerns were observed with the Ozurdex implant. The duration of efficacy was found to be <24 weeks.http://www.e-tjo.org/article.asp?issn=2211-5056;year=2018;volume=8;issue=3;spage=141;epage=148;aulast=NagpalDiabetic macular edemaOzurdex®posterior segment pathologiesretinal vein occlusionuveitic macular edema
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manish Nagpal
Navneet Mehrotra
Rakesh Juneja
Hardik Jain
spellingShingle Manish Nagpal
Navneet Mehrotra
Rakesh Juneja
Hardik Jain
Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
Diabetic macular edema
Ozurdex®
posterior segment pathologies
retinal vein occlusion
uveitic macular edema
author_facet Manish Nagpal
Navneet Mehrotra
Rakesh Juneja
Hardik Jain
author_sort Manish Nagpal
title Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario
title_short Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario
title_full Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario
title_fullStr Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario
title_full_unstemmed Dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in Indian patients with macular edema: Real-life scenario
title_sort dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg) in indian patients with macular edema: real-life scenario
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2211-5056
2211-5072
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Context: Role of Ozurdex in macular edema due to various posterior segment pathologies. AIM: The aim of this study is to report outcome of Ozurdex implant in macular edema (ME) secondary to various posterior segment pathologies. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective, interventional study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients of ME were treated with one or more Ozurdex implants (0.7 mg). Data collection included demographic details, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), duration of efficacy, and record of adverse events (if any) within 24 weeks. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired sample t-test, Stata data analysis, and statistical software, version 12.1, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA, were used in the study. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes of 104 patients were studied which had a diagnosis of diabetic ME (n = 46), retinal vein occlusion (n = 40), and uveitis (n = 30). The average age of patients (mean ± standard deviation) was 50.2 ± 21.9 years. Baseline mean ± SD (standard deviation) logMAR BCVA, CFT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were 0.636 ± 0.4, 527.8 ± 210.1 μm, and 15.3 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The reinjection interval was around 12–18 weeks. Ozurdex proved its efficacy in improving mean logMAR visual acuity and reduction of CFT from baseline till 12 weeks' follow-up period (0.414 ± 0.5 and 301.5 ± 278.5, respectively; P < 0.05), and after 12 weeks' follow-up, it started worsening (0.530 ± 0.9 and 444.8 ± 375.2, respectively; P > 0.05). The most common reported adverse event was significant rise of IOP (>5 mmHg), with a total of 12 cases followed by cataract 9 cases. CONCLUSION: Ozurdex implant leads to a significant improvement in BCVA and CFT values till 12 weeks, followed by a gradual decline for all the pathologies studied together. No new safety concerns were observed with the Ozurdex implant. The duration of efficacy was found to be <24 weeks.
topic Diabetic macular edema
Ozurdex®
posterior segment pathologies
retinal vein occlusion
uveitic macular edema
url http://www.e-tjo.org/article.asp?issn=2211-5056;year=2018;volume=8;issue=3;spage=141;epage=148;aulast=Nagpal
work_keys_str_mv AT manishnagpal dexamethasoneimplant07mginindianpatientswithmacularedemareallifescenario
AT navneetmehrotra dexamethasoneimplant07mginindianpatientswithmacularedemareallifescenario
AT rakeshjuneja dexamethasoneimplant07mginindianpatientswithmacularedemareallifescenario
AT hardikjain dexamethasoneimplant07mginindianpatientswithmacularedemareallifescenario
_version_ 1724829725816258560