Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices

The goal of this study was to analyze the impact of agriculture on the spatial and temporal variability of flow rate change indices from 1930 to 2008. The two indices used are the coefficient of immoderation (CI) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Values of these two indices are higher for the L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Assani, Francis Delisle, Raphaëlle Landry, Mushombe Muma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-11-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/11/4349
id doaj-3ba142da0e7c4831a5319860eed4db66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ba142da0e7c4831a5319860eed4db662020-11-25T01:08:01ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072015-11-016114349435910.3390/f6114349f6114349Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change IndicesAli Assani0Francis Delisle1Raphaëlle Landry2Mushombe Muma3Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaThe goal of this study was to analyze the impact of agriculture on the spatial and temporal variability of flow rate change indices from 1930 to 2008. The two indices used are the coefficient of immoderation (CI) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Values of these two indices are higher for the L’Assomption River agricultural watershed than for the Matawin River forested watershed due to higher runoff in the former than in the latter. The difference in these values between the two watersheds is greater for winter, but it is lower for summer, when the difference in runoff between the two watersheds is strongly attenuated by the presence of crops. Regarding the temporal variability, a difference between the two watersheds is observed in the fall. For the agricultural watershed, mean values of neither index show a break in slope, while a break is observed for the forested watershed. In both watersheds, both indices are positively correlated with maximum temperature and total rainfall in winter, but only to this latter climate variable in the fall. In springtime, the two indices are negatively correlated with minimum temperature in the forested watershed, but only CV is correlated, positively, with this same climate variable in the agricultural watershed.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/11/4349flow rate changecoefficient of variationcoefficient of immoderationtemperatureprecipitationagriculture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Assani
Francis Delisle
Raphaëlle Landry
Mushombe Muma
spellingShingle Ali Assani
Francis Delisle
Raphaëlle Landry
Mushombe Muma
Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
Forests
flow rate change
coefficient of variation
coefficient of immoderation
temperature
precipitation
agriculture
author_facet Ali Assani
Francis Delisle
Raphaëlle Landry
Mushombe Muma
author_sort Ali Assani
title Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
title_short Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
title_full Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
title_fullStr Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
title_sort effects of land use on flow rate change indices
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2015-11-01
description The goal of this study was to analyze the impact of agriculture on the spatial and temporal variability of flow rate change indices from 1930 to 2008. The two indices used are the coefficient of immoderation (CI) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Values of these two indices are higher for the L’Assomption River agricultural watershed than for the Matawin River forested watershed due to higher runoff in the former than in the latter. The difference in these values between the two watersheds is greater for winter, but it is lower for summer, when the difference in runoff between the two watersheds is strongly attenuated by the presence of crops. Regarding the temporal variability, a difference between the two watersheds is observed in the fall. For the agricultural watershed, mean values of neither index show a break in slope, while a break is observed for the forested watershed. In both watersheds, both indices are positively correlated with maximum temperature and total rainfall in winter, but only to this latter climate variable in the fall. In springtime, the two indices are negatively correlated with minimum temperature in the forested watershed, but only CV is correlated, positively, with this same climate variable in the agricultural watershed.
topic flow rate change
coefficient of variation
coefficient of immoderation
temperature
precipitation
agriculture
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/11/4349
work_keys_str_mv AT aliassani effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices
AT francisdelisle effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices
AT raphaellelandry effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices
AT mushombemuma effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices
_version_ 1725184731329331200