Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices
The goal of this study was to analyze the impact of agriculture on the spatial and temporal variability of flow rate change indices from 1930 to 2008. The two indices used are the coefficient of immoderation (CI) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Values of these two indices are higher for the L...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Forests |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/11/4349 |
id |
doaj-3ba142da0e7c4831a5319860eed4db66 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3ba142da0e7c4831a5319860eed4db662020-11-25T01:08:01ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072015-11-016114349435910.3390/f6114349f6114349Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change IndicesAli Assani0Francis Delisle1Raphaëlle Landry2Mushombe Muma3Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières QC G9A 5H7, CanadaThe goal of this study was to analyze the impact of agriculture on the spatial and temporal variability of flow rate change indices from 1930 to 2008. The two indices used are the coefficient of immoderation (CI) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Values of these two indices are higher for the L’Assomption River agricultural watershed than for the Matawin River forested watershed due to higher runoff in the former than in the latter. The difference in these values between the two watersheds is greater for winter, but it is lower for summer, when the difference in runoff between the two watersheds is strongly attenuated by the presence of crops. Regarding the temporal variability, a difference between the two watersheds is observed in the fall. For the agricultural watershed, mean values of neither index show a break in slope, while a break is observed for the forested watershed. In both watersheds, both indices are positively correlated with maximum temperature and total rainfall in winter, but only to this latter climate variable in the fall. In springtime, the two indices are negatively correlated with minimum temperature in the forested watershed, but only CV is correlated, positively, with this same climate variable in the agricultural watershed.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/11/4349flow rate changecoefficient of variationcoefficient of immoderationtemperatureprecipitationagriculture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ali Assani Francis Delisle Raphaëlle Landry Mushombe Muma |
spellingShingle |
Ali Assani Francis Delisle Raphaëlle Landry Mushombe Muma Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices Forests flow rate change coefficient of variation coefficient of immoderation temperature precipitation agriculture |
author_facet |
Ali Assani Francis Delisle Raphaëlle Landry Mushombe Muma |
author_sort |
Ali Assani |
title |
Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices |
title_short |
Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices |
title_full |
Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices |
title_fullStr |
Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of Land Use on Flow Rate Change Indices |
title_sort |
effects of land use on flow rate change indices |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Forests |
issn |
1999-4907 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
The goal of this study was to analyze the impact of agriculture on the spatial and temporal variability of flow rate change indices from 1930 to 2008. The two indices used are the coefficient of immoderation (CI) and the coefficient of variation (CV). Values of these two indices are higher for the L’Assomption River agricultural watershed than for the Matawin River forested watershed due to higher runoff in the former than in the latter. The difference in these values between the two watersheds is greater for winter, but it is lower for summer, when the difference in runoff between the two watersheds is strongly attenuated by the presence of crops. Regarding the temporal variability, a difference between the two watersheds is observed in the fall. For the agricultural watershed, mean values of neither index show a break in slope, while a break is observed for the forested watershed. In both watersheds, both indices are positively correlated with maximum temperature and total rainfall in winter, but only to this latter climate variable in the fall. In springtime, the two indices are negatively correlated with minimum temperature in the forested watershed, but only CV is correlated, positively, with this same climate variable in the agricultural watershed. |
topic |
flow rate change coefficient of variation coefficient of immoderation temperature precipitation agriculture |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/11/4349 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aliassani effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices AT francisdelisle effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices AT raphaellelandry effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices AT mushombemuma effectsoflanduseonflowratechangeindices |
_version_ |
1725184731329331200 |