Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood

This study assessed the uncertainty in flood impact assessment (FIA) that may be introduced by errors in moderate resolution regional and moderate resolution global Digital Elevation Models (DEM). One arc-second National Elevation Dataset (NED) and one arc-second Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. N. M. Bhuyian, Alfred Kalyanapu, Faisal Hossain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-12-01
Series:Geosciences
Subjects:
DEM
FIA
NED
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/7/4/132
id doaj-3b91152003d44aa99024b821e46f8b96
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b91152003d44aa99024b821e46f8b962020-11-24T21:15:22ZengMDPI AGGeosciences2076-32632017-12-017413210.3390/geosciences7040132geosciences7040132Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River FloodMd. N. M. Bhuyian0Alfred Kalyanapu1Faisal Hossain2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505-0001, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505-0001, USACivil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USAThis study assessed the uncertainty in flood impact assessment (FIA) that may be introduced by errors in moderate resolution regional and moderate resolution global Digital Elevation Models (DEM). One arc-second National Elevation Dataset (NED) and one arc-second Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEMs were selected to represent moderate resolution regional and global DEMs. The relative performance for scenarios based on each of the DEMs was compared to a “control” terrain (combination of surveyed river bathymetry and a 1/3 arc-second LiDAR for floodplains)-based scenario. Furthermore, a conveyance-based DEM correction technique was applied to the DEMs for investigating the suitability of the technique on selected DEMs, and determining subsequent improvement in the FIA. The May 2010 flood on the Cumberland River near Nashville, TN, was selected as the case study. It was found that the hydraulic properties necessary to implement the selected DEM correction technique could be more readily estimated from NED compared to SRTM. However, this study also prescribed alternate methods to extract necessary hydraulic properties if the DEM quality was compromised. NED-based hydrodynamic modeling resulted in a high overestimation of the simulated flood stage, but the SRTM-based model was unable to produce any reasonable result prior to DEM correction. Nevertheless, after DEM correction, both models became stable and produced less error. Error in simulated flood consequence (i.e., total structures affected and total loss in dollars) also dropped accordingly, following the DEM correction. Therefore, application of this conveyance-based correction technique is reasonably effective on both moderate-resolution regional and global DEMs. The effectiveness of the technique on moderate resolution global DEM underscores the potential for users of remote and data-poor areas.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/7/4/132DEMFIAflood riskSRTMNEDslope
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Md. N. M. Bhuyian
Alfred Kalyanapu
Faisal Hossain
spellingShingle Md. N. M. Bhuyian
Alfred Kalyanapu
Faisal Hossain
Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood
Geosciences
DEM
FIA
flood risk
SRTM
NED
slope
author_facet Md. N. M. Bhuyian
Alfred Kalyanapu
Faisal Hossain
author_sort Md. N. M. Bhuyian
title Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood
title_short Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood
title_full Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood
title_fullStr Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Conveyance-Based DEM Correction Technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for Flood Impact Assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River Flood
title_sort evaluating conveyance-based dem correction technique on ned and srtm dems for flood impact assessment of the 2010 cumberland river flood
publisher MDPI AG
series Geosciences
issn 2076-3263
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This study assessed the uncertainty in flood impact assessment (FIA) that may be introduced by errors in moderate resolution regional and moderate resolution global Digital Elevation Models (DEM). One arc-second National Elevation Dataset (NED) and one arc-second Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEMs were selected to represent moderate resolution regional and global DEMs. The relative performance for scenarios based on each of the DEMs was compared to a “control” terrain (combination of surveyed river bathymetry and a 1/3 arc-second LiDAR for floodplains)-based scenario. Furthermore, a conveyance-based DEM correction technique was applied to the DEMs for investigating the suitability of the technique on selected DEMs, and determining subsequent improvement in the FIA. The May 2010 flood on the Cumberland River near Nashville, TN, was selected as the case study. It was found that the hydraulic properties necessary to implement the selected DEM correction technique could be more readily estimated from NED compared to SRTM. However, this study also prescribed alternate methods to extract necessary hydraulic properties if the DEM quality was compromised. NED-based hydrodynamic modeling resulted in a high overestimation of the simulated flood stage, but the SRTM-based model was unable to produce any reasonable result prior to DEM correction. Nevertheless, after DEM correction, both models became stable and produced less error. Error in simulated flood consequence (i.e., total structures affected and total loss in dollars) also dropped accordingly, following the DEM correction. Therefore, application of this conveyance-based correction technique is reasonably effective on both moderate-resolution regional and global DEMs. The effectiveness of the technique on moderate resolution global DEM underscores the potential for users of remote and data-poor areas.
topic DEM
FIA
flood risk
SRTM
NED
slope
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/7/4/132
work_keys_str_mv AT mdnmbhuyian evaluatingconveyancebaseddemcorrectiontechniqueonnedandsrtmdemsforfloodimpactassessmentofthe2010cumberlandriverflood
AT alfredkalyanapu evaluatingconveyancebaseddemcorrectiontechniqueonnedandsrtmdemsforfloodimpactassessmentofthe2010cumberlandriverflood
AT faisalhossain evaluatingconveyancebaseddemcorrectiontechniqueonnedandsrtmdemsforfloodimpactassessmentofthe2010cumberlandriverflood
_version_ 1716745568538066944