International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation

Background Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luciana K. Tanno, Razvigor Darlenski, Silvia Sánchez-Garcia, Matteo Bonini, Andrea Vereda, Pavel Kolkhir, Dario Antolin-Amerigo, Vesselin Dimov, Claudia Gallego-Corella, Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra, Alexander Diaz, Virginia Bellido Linares, Leonor Villa, Lanny J. Rosenwasser, Mario Sanchez-Borges, Ignacio Ansotegui, Ruby Pawankar, Thomas Bieber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-01-01
Series:World Allergy Organization Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119301644
id doaj-3b7280ce77664b87b9de32ddcb0bcd55
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luciana K. Tanno
Razvigor Darlenski
Silvia Sánchez-Garcia
Matteo Bonini
Andrea Vereda
Pavel Kolkhir
Dario Antolin-Amerigo
Vesselin Dimov
Claudia Gallego-Corella
Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra
Alexander Diaz
Virginia Bellido Linares
Leonor Villa
Lanny J. Rosenwasser
Mario Sanchez-Borges
Ignacio Ansotegui
Ruby Pawankar
Thomas Bieber
spellingShingle Luciana K. Tanno
Razvigor Darlenski
Silvia Sánchez-Garcia
Matteo Bonini
Andrea Vereda
Pavel Kolkhir
Dario Antolin-Amerigo
Vesselin Dimov
Claudia Gallego-Corella
Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra
Alexander Diaz
Virginia Bellido Linares
Leonor Villa
Lanny J. Rosenwasser
Mario Sanchez-Borges
Ignacio Ansotegui
Ruby Pawankar
Thomas Bieber
International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
World Allergy Organization Journal
author_facet Luciana K. Tanno
Razvigor Darlenski
Silvia Sánchez-Garcia
Matteo Bonini
Andrea Vereda
Pavel Kolkhir
Dario Antolin-Amerigo
Vesselin Dimov
Claudia Gallego-Corella
Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra
Alexander Diaz
Virginia Bellido Linares
Leonor Villa
Lanny J. Rosenwasser
Mario Sanchez-Borges
Ignacio Ansotegui
Ruby Pawankar
Thomas Bieber
author_sort Luciana K. Tanno
title International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
title_short International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
title_full International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
title_fullStr International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
title_full_unstemmed International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
title_sort international survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
publisher Elsevier
series World Allergy Organization Journal
issn 1939-4551
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of the application, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) that have been used for testing, the appropriate interpretation of the skin reactions or the evaluation of the patient’s benefit.Methods We performed an Internet –based survey with 38 questions covering the educational background of respondents, patch test methods and interpretation. The questionnaire was distributed among all representatives of national member societies of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), and the WAO Junior Members Group.Results One hundred sixty-nine completed surveys were received from 47 countries. The majority of participants had more than 5 years of clinical practice (61 %) and routinely carried out patch tests (70 %). Both allergists and dermatologists were responsible for carrying out the patch tests. We could observe the use of many different guidelines regardless the geographical distribution. The use of home-made preparations was indicated by 47 % of participants and 73 % of the respondents performed 2 or 3 readings. Most of the responders indicated having patients with adverse reactions, including erythroderma (12 %); however, only 30 % of members completed a consent form before conducting the patch test.Discussion The heterogeneity of patch test practices may be influenced by the level of awareness of clinical guidelines, different training backgrounds, accessibility to various types of devices, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) used for testing, type of clinical practice (public or private practice, clinical or research-based institution), infrastructure availability, financial/commercial implications and regulations among others.Conclusion There is a lack of a worldwide homogeneity of patch test procedures, and this raises concerns about the need for standardization and harmonization of this important diagnostic procedure. Keywords: Allergy, Contact dermatitis, Sensitization, Skin patch test, Survey
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119301644
work_keys_str_mv AT lucianaktanno internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT razvigordarlenski internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT silviasanchezgarcia internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT matteobonini internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT andreavereda internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT pavelkolkhir internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT darioantolinamerigo internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT vesselindimov internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT claudiagallegocorella internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT juancarlosaldavebecerra internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT alexanderdiaz internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT virginiabellidolinares internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT leonorvilla internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT lannyjrosenwasser internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT mariosanchezborges internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT ignacioansotegui internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT rubypawankar internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
AT thomasbieber internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation
_version_ 1724850506647470080
spelling doaj-3b7280ce77664b87b9de32ddcb0bcd552020-11-25T02:25:44ZengElsevierWorld Allergy Organization Journal1939-45512016-01-019International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretationLuciana K. Tanno0Razvigor Darlenski1Silvia Sánchez-Garcia2Matteo Bonini3Andrea Vereda4Pavel Kolkhir5Dario Antolin-Amerigo6Vesselin Dimov7Claudia Gallego-Corella8Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra9Alexander Diaz10Virginia Bellido Linares11Leonor Villa12Lanny J. Rosenwasser13Mario Sanchez-Borges14Ignacio Ansotegui15Ruby Pawankar16Thomas Bieber17Hospital Sírio Libanês and Post-graduation Program in Health Sciences of IAMSPE, Rua Prof Arthur Ramos, 183, cj 21 01454-011, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Correspondence:Department of Dermatolgy and Venereology, Tokuda Hospital Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaAllergy Department. Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, ItalyAllergy Clinic, Paris 75015, FranceDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RussiaImmune System Diseases and Oncology Service-Allergy Unit. Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Medicine and Medical Specialities Department, Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd Weston, Florida, FL 33331, USAMedicine Faculty, Xochicalco University, Tijuana, MexicoAllergy and Immunology Division, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, PeruDepartment of Allergy, Medical Center, Guira de Melena, Havana, CubaIntercenter Allergy Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, SpainSanatorio Privado San Roque, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, ArgentinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology Research, Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics, Kansas City MO 64108, USAAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Medico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, VenezuelaDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quirón Bizkaia, Bizkaia, SpainDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, GermanyBackground Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of the application, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) that have been used for testing, the appropriate interpretation of the skin reactions or the evaluation of the patient’s benefit.Methods We performed an Internet –based survey with 38 questions covering the educational background of respondents, patch test methods and interpretation. The questionnaire was distributed among all representatives of national member societies of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), and the WAO Junior Members Group.Results One hundred sixty-nine completed surveys were received from 47 countries. The majority of participants had more than 5 years of clinical practice (61 %) and routinely carried out patch tests (70 %). Both allergists and dermatologists were responsible for carrying out the patch tests. We could observe the use of many different guidelines regardless the geographical distribution. The use of home-made preparations was indicated by 47 % of participants and 73 % of the respondents performed 2 or 3 readings. Most of the responders indicated having patients with adverse reactions, including erythroderma (12 %); however, only 30 % of members completed a consent form before conducting the patch test.Discussion The heterogeneity of patch test practices may be influenced by the level of awareness of clinical guidelines, different training backgrounds, accessibility to various types of devices, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) used for testing, type of clinical practice (public or private practice, clinical or research-based institution), infrastructure availability, financial/commercial implications and regulations among others.Conclusion There is a lack of a worldwide homogeneity of patch test procedures, and this raises concerns about the need for standardization and harmonization of this important diagnostic procedure. Keywords: Allergy, Contact dermatitis, Sensitization, Skin patch test, Surveyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119301644