International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation
Background Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-01-01
|
Series: | World Allergy Organization Journal |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119301644 |
id |
doaj-3b7280ce77664b87b9de32ddcb0bcd55 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luciana K. Tanno Razvigor Darlenski Silvia Sánchez-Garcia Matteo Bonini Andrea Vereda Pavel Kolkhir Dario Antolin-Amerigo Vesselin Dimov Claudia Gallego-Corella Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra Alexander Diaz Virginia Bellido Linares Leonor Villa Lanny J. Rosenwasser Mario Sanchez-Borges Ignacio Ansotegui Ruby Pawankar Thomas Bieber |
spellingShingle |
Luciana K. Tanno Razvigor Darlenski Silvia Sánchez-Garcia Matteo Bonini Andrea Vereda Pavel Kolkhir Dario Antolin-Amerigo Vesselin Dimov Claudia Gallego-Corella Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra Alexander Diaz Virginia Bellido Linares Leonor Villa Lanny J. Rosenwasser Mario Sanchez-Borges Ignacio Ansotegui Ruby Pawankar Thomas Bieber International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation World Allergy Organization Journal |
author_facet |
Luciana K. Tanno Razvigor Darlenski Silvia Sánchez-Garcia Matteo Bonini Andrea Vereda Pavel Kolkhir Dario Antolin-Amerigo Vesselin Dimov Claudia Gallego-Corella Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra Alexander Diaz Virginia Bellido Linares Leonor Villa Lanny J. Rosenwasser Mario Sanchez-Borges Ignacio Ansotegui Ruby Pawankar Thomas Bieber |
author_sort |
Luciana K. Tanno |
title |
International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation |
title_short |
International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation |
title_full |
International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation |
title_fullStr |
International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed |
International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation |
title_sort |
international survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
World Allergy Organization Journal |
issn |
1939-4551 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Background Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of the application, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) that have been used for testing, the appropriate interpretation of the skin reactions or the evaluation of the patient’s benefit.Methods We performed an Internet –based survey with 38 questions covering the educational background of respondents, patch test methods and interpretation. The questionnaire was distributed among all representatives of national member societies of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), and the WAO Junior Members Group.Results One hundred sixty-nine completed surveys were received from 47 countries. The majority of participants had more than 5 years of clinical practice (61 %) and routinely carried out patch tests (70 %). Both allergists and dermatologists were responsible for carrying out the patch tests. We could observe the use of many different guidelines regardless the geographical distribution. The use of home-made preparations was indicated by 47 % of participants and 73 % of the respondents performed 2 or 3 readings. Most of the responders indicated having patients with adverse reactions, including erythroderma (12 %); however, only 30 % of members completed a consent form before conducting the patch test.Discussion The heterogeneity of patch test practices may be influenced by the level of awareness of clinical guidelines, different training backgrounds, accessibility to various types of devices, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) used for testing, type of clinical practice (public or private practice, clinical or research-based institution), infrastructure availability, financial/commercial implications and regulations among others.Conclusion There is a lack of a worldwide homogeneity of patch test procedures, and this raises concerns about the need for standardization and harmonization of this important diagnostic procedure. Keywords: Allergy, Contact dermatitis, Sensitization, Skin patch test, Survey |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119301644 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lucianaktanno internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT razvigordarlenski internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT silviasanchezgarcia internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT matteobonini internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT andreavereda internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT pavelkolkhir internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT darioantolinamerigo internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT vesselindimov internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT claudiagallegocorella internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT juancarlosaldavebecerra internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT alexanderdiaz internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT virginiabellidolinares internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT leonorvilla internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT lannyjrosenwasser internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT mariosanchezborges internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT ignacioansotegui internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT rubypawankar internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation AT thomasbieber internationalsurveyonskinpatchtestproceduresattitudesandinterpretation |
_version_ |
1724850506647470080 |
spelling |
doaj-3b7280ce77664b87b9de32ddcb0bcd552020-11-25T02:25:44ZengElsevierWorld Allergy Organization Journal1939-45512016-01-019International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretationLuciana K. Tanno0Razvigor Darlenski1Silvia Sánchez-Garcia2Matteo Bonini3Andrea Vereda4Pavel Kolkhir5Dario Antolin-Amerigo6Vesselin Dimov7Claudia Gallego-Corella8Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra9Alexander Diaz10Virginia Bellido Linares11Leonor Villa12Lanny J. Rosenwasser13Mario Sanchez-Borges14Ignacio Ansotegui15Ruby Pawankar16Thomas Bieber17Hospital Sírio Libanês and Post-graduation Program in Health Sciences of IAMSPE, Rua Prof Arthur Ramos, 183, cj 21 01454-011, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Correspondence:Department of Dermatolgy and Venereology, Tokuda Hospital Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaAllergy Department. Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, ItalyAllergy Clinic, Paris 75015, FranceDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RussiaImmune System Diseases and Oncology Service-Allergy Unit. Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Medicine and Medical Specialities Department, Universidad de Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd Weston, Florida, FL 33331, USAMedicine Faculty, Xochicalco University, Tijuana, MexicoAllergy and Immunology Division, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, PeruDepartment of Allergy, Medical Center, Guira de Melena, Havana, CubaIntercenter Allergy Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, SpainSanatorio Privado San Roque, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, ArgentinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology Research, Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics, Kansas City MO 64108, USAAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Medico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, VenezuelaDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quirón Bizkaia, Bizkaia, SpainDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, GermanyBackground Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of the application, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) that have been used for testing, the appropriate interpretation of the skin reactions or the evaluation of the patient’s benefit.Methods We performed an Internet –based survey with 38 questions covering the educational background of respondents, patch test methods and interpretation. The questionnaire was distributed among all representatives of national member societies of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), and the WAO Junior Members Group.Results One hundred sixty-nine completed surveys were received from 47 countries. The majority of participants had more than 5 years of clinical practice (61 %) and routinely carried out patch tests (70 %). Both allergists and dermatologists were responsible for carrying out the patch tests. We could observe the use of many different guidelines regardless the geographical distribution. The use of home-made preparations was indicated by 47 % of participants and 73 % of the respondents performed 2 or 3 readings. Most of the responders indicated having patients with adverse reactions, including erythroderma (12 %); however, only 30 % of members completed a consent form before conducting the patch test.Discussion The heterogeneity of patch test practices may be influenced by the level of awareness of clinical guidelines, different training backgrounds, accessibility to various types of devices, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) used for testing, type of clinical practice (public or private practice, clinical or research-based institution), infrastructure availability, financial/commercial implications and regulations among others.Conclusion There is a lack of a worldwide homogeneity of patch test procedures, and this raises concerns about the need for standardization and harmonization of this important diagnostic procedure. Keywords: Allergy, Contact dermatitis, Sensitization, Skin patch test, Surveyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455119301644 |