Integrating User-Centered Design and Behavioral Science to Design a Mobile Intervention for Obesity and Binge Eating: Mixed Methods Analysis

BackgroundAccounting for how end users engage with technologies is imperative for designing an efficacious mobile behavioral intervention. ObjectiveThis mixed methods analysis examined the translational potential of user-centered design and basic behavioral scienc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Graham, Andrea K, Munson, Sean A, Reddy, Madhu, Neubert, Sarah W, Green, Emilie A, Chang, Angela, Spring, Bonnie, Mohr, David C, Wildes, Jennifer E
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-05-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2021/5/e23809
Description
Summary:BackgroundAccounting for how end users engage with technologies is imperative for designing an efficacious mobile behavioral intervention. ObjectiveThis mixed methods analysis examined the translational potential of user-centered design and basic behavioral science to inform the design of a new mobile intervention for obesity and binge eating. MethodsA total of 22 adults (7/22, 32% non-Hispanic White; 8/22, 36% male) with self-reported obesity and recurrent binge eating (≥12 episodes in 3 months) who were interested in losing weight and reducing binge eating completed a prototyping design activity over 1 week. Leveraging evidence from behavioral economics on choice architecture, participants chose treatment strategies from 20 options (aligned with treatment targets composing a theoretical model of the relation between binge eating and weight) to demonstrate which strategies and treatment targets are relevant to end users. The process by which participants selected and implemented strategies and their change in outcomes were analyzed. ResultsAlthough prompted to select one strategy, participants selected between 1 and 3 strategies, citing perceived achievability, helpfulness, or relevance as selection reasons. Over the week, all practiced a strategy at least once; 82% (18/22) struggled with implementation, and 23% (5/22) added a new strategy. Several themes emerged on successes and challenges with implementation, yielding design implications for supporting users in behavior change. In postexperiment reflections, 82% (18/22) indicated the strategy was helpful, and 86% (19/22) planned to continue use. One-week average within-subject changes in weight (–2.2 [SD –5.0] pounds) and binge eating (–1.6 [SD –1.8] episodes) indicated small clinical improvement. ConclusionsApplying user-centered design and basic behavioral science yielded design insights to incorporate personalization through user choice with guidance, which may enhance engagement with and potential efficacy of digital health interventions.
ISSN:2561-326X