Comparative Effectiveness of Pediatric Integrative Medicine: A Pragmatic Cluster-Controlled Trial

• Main Authors: Sunita Vohra, Salima Punja, Hsing Jou, Michael Schlegelmilch, Beverly Wilson, Maria Spavor, Paul Grundy, Andrew S. Mackie, Jennifer Conway, Dawn Hartfield
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
• Series: Children
• Subjects: pediatrics; integrative medicine; complementary therapies
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/4/311

Symptoms of pain, nausea/vomiting, and anxiety (PNVA) are highly prevalent in pediatric inpatients. Poorly managed symptoms can lead to decreased compliance with care, and prolonged recovery times. Pharmacotherapy used to manage PNVA symptoms is of variable effectiveness and carries safety risks. Complementary therapies to manage these symptoms are gaining popularity due to their perceived benefits and low risk of harm. Pediatric integrative medicine (PIM) is the combination of complementary therapies with conventional medicine in pediatric populations. A two-arm, cluster-controlled, pragmatic clinical trial was carried out to compare the effectiveness of a PIM service in conjunction with usual care, versus usual care only to treat PNVA symptoms in hospitalized pediatric patients. The primary outcome was the improvement of PNVA symptom severity using a 10-point numerical rating scale. Participant enrollment occurred between January 2013 and January 2016. A total of 872 participants (usual care <i>n</i> = 497; PIM <i>n</i> = 375) were enrolled. The PIM therapies significantly reduced PNVA symptom severity (<i>p</i> < 0.001). This study found that a hospital-based PIM service is both safe and effective for alleviating PNVA symptoms. Future research should carry out this work in other pediatric inpatient divisions, and in other sites to determine the reproducibility of findings.